Connect with us

ASIA

Women’s rights situation in Afghanistan

Published

on

All human beings are born free and equal in terms of dignity and basic rights, and they deserve these rights because they are humans. However, in Afghanistan, the people are going through hardship in its history of human rights, especially women rights since the return of the Taliban on August 15 2021.

Today, the Afghan people have been deprived of their most basic and fundamental human rights, and Afghan women, making half of the society, have been completely excluded from political, social and economic life.

While the world insists on the equality of men and women in all human rights, the women in Afghanistan have been deprived of their most natural and basic rights such as rights to education, work, political participation, freedom, organizing gatherings, and protests, and etc….

In return, the Taliban’s response to women’s protests and lawsuit against these deprivations was nothing but intimidation and threats, severe repression, arbitrary arrests and imprisonment, murder and torture.

Rights to education

The right to education is one of the fundamental human rights. These have been also mentioned in Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 28 and 29 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Article 10 of the Convention on the Elimination of Any Discrimination Against Women and other general international human rights documents. Humanity and women’s rights have been emphasized in these articles repeatedly.

Based on these rights, all people across the globe must have equal access to education. But Afghanistan, the only country in the world, has denied women of their right to education. The Taliban has banned women from school, university and education.

Rights to freedom

The Taliban also restricted women’s right to freedom in every level of society. Based on orders, all the women are required to wear long black dresses. Putting any other color in official places is punishable. The women must also cover their faces with a black mask. With these restrictions, the Taliban, in addition to removing the identity of women, are seeking to remove their face from society.

Moreover, the Taliban also restricted one of the most basic and natural rights of women, the rights to freedom of movement in the society.

Through a series of restrictions, the Taliban prevented adult women without a male partner from traveling abroad or even within the country to other provinces.

Sadly, women cannot go to government offices and hospitals and health centers without a male partner even in emergency cases. The restrictions come despite the fact that many women have lost their husbands and fathers in wars and explosions and have no male partner in their families.

Women have been deprived of all social and health services in the wake of these restrictions.

These restrictions also deprive many women from the opportunity of scholarships abroad or necessary trips for treatment.

Following a sequence of restrictions, the Taliban also banned women from going to parks, recreation centers, restaurants and women public baths.

This open discrimination is actually a violation of Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes freedom of movement. Such laws do not exist in the laws of any country, even in Islamic states.

The Taliban want to remove women from society and remove their identities and physical appearance through these discriminatory actions. With these decisions, the Taliban violated important principles of human dignity, freedom and equality, which are at the top of all human rights and freedoms.

Right to work

Men and women are born free and are equal in terms of dignity and social rights, according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as the most important human rights document agreed and accepted by all governments.

Taking note of this, all women have the right to enjoy the desired economic life, and have a free hand to choose a job to elevate themselves from poverty.

Moreover, based on these human rights declaration, women should not be subjected to torture or cruel punishment, and contrary to humanity and human affairs. They should also not be forced to accept a job and rather they must choose any occupation on their own.

Meanwhile, according to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, member states must recognize the right of women to work and provide them the opportunity to freely choose any job that would help support the family.

The Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women also emphasized on the fact that equality between men and women in employment leads to the realization of their rights, and also declares: Discrimination in any way against women’s employment rights violates the principle of equality and respect. It is human character and must not be violated.

With the return of Taliban into power, the Afghan women have been widely deprived of the right to work and ordered to stay at home.  The Taliban dismissed female employees working in ministries, government offices, judicial courts and those who were serving in police rank.

Businesswomen, artists, athletes, audio and visual media employees, female journalists and employees of private companies have already lost their jobs as per Taliban order.

The Taliban in a recent decree banned women from all jobs, including those working in foreign institutions and relief organizations. This comes despite the fact that many of these women are the breadwinners of their families, who are now unemployed and struggling with poverty.

In many cases, these women started to beg at the streets or sell their children due to extreme poverty and destitution.

Such exclusion and restriction on women’s jobs, in addition to paralyzing the country’s economic and development cycle, leads to the spread of poverty and misery in the society.

The Taliban have deprived women from working under the pretext that their works are against Islamic standards.

These restrictions come despite the fact that there is no prohibition on women’s work and economic activity in Islamic laws.

If you look at other Islamic countries, women are equal to men in various jobs and play an active role in the development and prosperity of their country’s economy.

By banning women from workplaces, the Taliban have clearly violated one of its most basic human rights, which is mentioned in the most important international documents above.

Right to the politics

The right of political participation of women, equal to men, is clearly stated in the most important international documents.

Among other things, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights deals with the right of political participation of all members of the society, including women, on equal terms with men.

Moreover, Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights emphasized the right of women to political participation in a society without discrimination.

Also, the Convention on the Political Rights of Women approved in 1952 explicitly and specifically deals with the implementation of the principle of equal rights of women and men in the enjoyment and exercise of political rights in accordance with the Charter and Covenant.

In addition, articles seven and eight of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, had also referred to women’s political participation and the right to vote in all elections and referendums, and the right to be elected and participate in determining government policy. It also touched upon appointing women to government positions and conducting government affairs in all levels are emphasized in equal terms with men.

Afghanistan is a member of all these conventions and human rights documents, but however, women’s right to political participation was completely violated, and no women are seen in the cabinet and high government positions. It won’t be a lie to say that women have been completely excluded from the country’s political scene.

Right to hold peaceful protests

Freedom of assembly and protest is one of the fundamental human rights, which is emphasized in Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21 of the Convention on Civil-Political Rights, Conventions No. 87 and 98 of the International Labor Organization and other international and regional human rights documents.

All citizens and socio-political forces in a society have the right to make their voices heard by those in power through peaceful civil gatherings and demonstrations. These marches or gatherings come to make these politicians accountable for their policies, plans, actions and behavior.

However, the Taliban has so far tried to suppress the voice of protesters and went to beat, arrest, imprison and torture them. The women, who protest to defend their rights, face severe repressions that even put their lives and their families in serious danger.

Translated from etilaatroz 

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey