Diplomacy
Schiller Institute conference calls for new global paradigm amid turbulence
The Schiller Institute International Conference, held on May 24-25, 2025, convened a diverse group of international speakers to discuss “A Beautiful Vision for Humanity in Times of Great Turbulence.” Moderated by Dennis Speed of The Schiller Institute, the event aimed to catalyze intense discussion and reevaluation among global citizens, proposing a new security and development architecture to navigate the current tumultuous geopolitical landscape.
The conference began with a musical prelude, followed by an excerpt from a 1982 speech by the late Lyndon LaRouche, co-founder of The Schiller Institute. LaRouche’s historical analysis emphasized the foundational principles of the American republic and its intended role in fostering global progress, a theme that resonated throughout the subsequent discussions.
‘There is no problem human creativity can’t solve’
Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of The Schiller Institute, delivered the keynote address, asserting her optimistic view of human potential. “We are the creative species,” she stated, emphasizing that “our creative reason is capable of always finding a solution to any problem on a higher plane.” Zepp-LaRouche called for a new paradigm in international relations, moving beyond geopolitical confrontations.
She critiqued the current global disarray, highlighting the regression into barbarism evident in conflicts like Gaza and the war in Ukraine. Zepp-LaRouche pointed to the self-inflicted economic crises in Europe, stemming from sanctions against Russia and “green ideology,” contrasting this with Germany’s post-World War II reconstruction. “Everything that was built up in Germany out of the rubber fields from the end of the Second World War is now being dismantled,” she lamented.
Zepp-LaRouche traced current tensions back to the post-Cold War era, arguing that the “historic chance of German unification was sabotaged through the geopolitical maneuvers of the neocons.” She cited broken promises regarding NATO expansion, referencing declassified documents and former German Foreign Minister Genscher’s “Tutzing formula,” which assured Gorbachev NATO would not extend eastward. “This was the original sin of the post-Cold War order,” she declared, quoting George Kennan’s 1997 critique of NATO expansion as a “tragic mistake.”
She contrasted the West’s approach with China’s economic success and the Belt and Road Initiative, which has lifted millions out of poverty. “If the US and EU declare China to be a systemic rival, the collective west has lost that race already,” Zepp-LaRouche asserted. She urged a shift from geopolitical confrontation to cooperation, invoking Nicholas of Cusa’s concept of harmonious development where each nation’s interest includes the development of all others. “Let us mobilize, therefore, and issue a passionate appeal for the peaceful transformation to a new epoch in human history,” she concluded, outlining a vision of future progress through fusion energy, space exploration, and global development initiatives like the World Land Bridge and the Oasis Plan.
‘The world is today at a precipice’
H.E. Naledi Pandor, former Minister of International Relations and Cooperation for South Africa, described the current “toxic geopolitical environment” negatively affecting human advancement. She highlighted the rise of right-wing populism and chauvinistic nationalism, stating, “These reversals threaten our four decades of broadly peaceful coexistence.” Pandor called for progressive organizations to unite and restore multipolarity, focusing on global challenges like poverty, underdevelopment, and climate change. She praised South Africa’s efforts in bringing the case of Palestine before the International Court of Justice. “It is tragic that we’ve allowed over 18 months of slaughter of the people of Palestine,” she said, urging robust action to restore sanity and create a safer world. Pandor emphasized the growing importance of BRICS countries in changing the world order and focusing on humanity.
‘This multipolar world order is still to come’
Professor Zhang Weiwei from Fudan University, China, observed that while the world is already multipolar in terms of GDP (with BRICS surpassing G7), the “multipolar world order is still to come.” He characterized Russia as a “revolutionary” force seeking to undermine the unipolar order, China as a “reformer” aiming to improve the existing system, and the US under Trump as an “abandoner” looking backward. Professor Zhang presented three positive case studies from Asia: the “win-win” development model of China and ASEAN, China’s Belt and Road Initiative based on “discussing together, building together, benefiting together,” and China’s successful Green Deal, including the Taklamakan Desert Project, which offers a model for initiatives like the Oasis Plan.
‘The interests of the global humanity of the whole is more important than any country’s national interest’
H.E. Donald Ramotar, Former President of Guyana, condemned the “inhumanity of the international socioeconomic system,” particularly evident in the Gaza conflict, which he termed a “genocide.” He argued that the root of global crises is the attempt by imperialist states to maintain dominance and exploitation. Ramotar highlighted the crippling debt burden on Global South nations and the exploitative practices of transnational corporations. He pointed to BRICS as an alternative path, promoting mutually beneficial international relations. He called for a renewed campaign for nuclear abolition and greater organization among democratic, peace-loving forces.
Ambassador Jack Matlock, former US Ambassador to the Soviet Union, reflected on the end of the Cold War, emphasizing it was achieved through negotiation, not victory. He criticized the subsequent expansion of NATO, driven by Eastern European requests but ultimately transforming a defensive alliance into a potential offensive one. “It was not so much the expansion of NATO… What was really sensitive was putting foreign military bases in these countries,” Matlock stated. He described the war in Ukraine as a “tragedy” that “did not have to happen,” noting that stability requires a Ukrainian government willing to live in peace with Russia without threatening foreign bases.
‘Peace is the restrained tolerance of a post-war status quo’
Ambassador Chas Freeman, former US Assistant Secretary of Defense, critiqued the West’s “forever wars” and “fantasy foreign policy.” He argued that the Ukraine war has devastated Ukraine without weakening Russia and that the West lacks a viable peace plan. “An enemy that is unbowed will predictably insist on terms that serve its interests,” Freeman noted, urging the West to address Russia’s long-standing security concerns to achieve peace in Europe.
Scott Ritter, former USMC Intelligence officer and UN Weapons Inspector, delivered a passionate call for dialogue. “Dialogue was the solution,” he asserted, recounting his experiences with arms control and inspections. Regarding Gaza, Ritter provocatively stated, “We who applaud what Hamas did are as responsible for the genocide as those who provide the bombs, because we facilitate it.” He urged finding common cause even with adversaries to save lives, emphasizing, “The answer is dialogue.”
Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, invoked Bishop Desmond Tutu: “To remain neutral is to be on the side of the oppressor.” He condemned the genocide in Gaza and urged action, referencing German theologian Albrecht Haushofer’s poignant self-reproach for not speaking out sooner against evil.
Ambassador Dmitry Chumakov, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN, expressed happiness at hearing “people with common sense.” He highlighted the economic turbulence and the refusal of rich countries to help poorer nations, calling for a multipolar world and an end to “wild capitalism.” He noted that BRICS countries now represent 37% of world GDP, surpassing the G7’s 29%.
The conference also featured a video address from Ju Juti, Associate Research Fellow from the Academy of Contemporary China and World Studies, who outlined four major strategic challenges: the peace deficit, development deficit, security deficit, and governance deficit, calling for multilateralism and reform of global governance.
The panel concluded with Helga Zepp-LaRouche reiterating the need for a new global security and development architecture, emphasizing concrete projects like the World Land Bridge and the creation of 3 billion new productive jobs in developing nations as pathways to peace and stability.
Diplomacy
CSTO strips Armenia of voting rights over two-year budget debt
Members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) have stripped Armenia of its voting rights and its ability to appoint representatives to official positions due to a two-year debt to the organization’s budget.
Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, “This decision was taken based on the organization’s charter due to Armenia’s failure to fulfil its obligations for several years.”
Prior to the CSTO leaders’ summit in Moscow, Peskov had stated that member states would “react” to the Caucasus country’s non-participation in the organization’s activities.
Ahead of the Moscow summit, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said his country’s “interest has run out” regarding the CSTO. Through his press spokesperson, he announced that he would travel to Türkiye on 11 November to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) instead of going to Russia.
The CSTO leaders’ meeting was held with the participation of Russian President Vladimir Putin alongside the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.
The leaders jointly took the decision to revoke Armenia’s voting rights.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the participants also signed a joint declaration.
The declaration stated: “We confirm our unconditional commitment to the goals set out in the CSTO treaty and charter towards creating favourable and stable conditions for the comprehensive development of member states.”
Pashinyan had frozen Yerevan’s de facto participation in the CSTO in February 2024, citing the organization’s failure to aid the Armenian side during the armed clashes in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023.
Having referred to the CSTO as a “soap-bubble alliance” since that time, Pashinyan accused the organization’s members of “planning war” together with Baku. He stated that Armenia would not return to active work within the alliance at least “over the next five years”, adding that he would welcome it if the country were expelled from membership.
Relations between Armenia and Russia grew tense once again in the spring of 2026, after Yerevan moved closer to the European Union (EU) and the Kremlin responded with a trade war.
In May, Pashinyan refused to travel to Moscow to attend the Victory Day parade and declared that he did not support Russia on the Ukraine issue.
In response, Putin called on Yerevan to determine its foreign policy course through a referendum, advising Armenian authorities not to forget the fate of Ukraine.
Diplomacy
US urges Russia to draft proposals for new European security pact
The US administration has reportedly called on Russia to submit proposals for a prospective security treaty with Europe that would include measures to ease tensions between European nations and Moscow.
According to a report by news site Axios citing sources familiar with the matter, the US side conveyed the request during trilateral negotiations held in Abu Dhabi.
During the talks, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that the Russian delegation prepare a fresh proposal outlining its security concerns and demands.
The US delegation reportedly asked that this proposal clarify what kind of “symmetrical steps” Moscow is prepared to take to de-escalate tensions and “provide non-aggression guarantees to Europe”.
Another source familiar with the White House’s approach said the Trump administration aims to run the processes for a new European security architecture and a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine simultaneously.
Under this plan, the actual implementation of the security understandings would take effect only after the signing of an accord ending the conflict in Ukraine.
Assessing the approach to the process, the source said: “[Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy will not agree to any compromise without knowing what will happen next regarding security guarantees. Putin also wants to see the exact same picture clearly. This is precisely why the security portfolio is so decisive.”
The same official noted that the US will not reach a security agreement with Russia without the support of Europe and Ukraine, adding that Washington will not grant Moscow veto power over European security decisions.
Vladimir Medinsky, aide to the Russian president and head of the delegation in the Ukraine negotiations, previously stated that the fundamental objective was building a comprehensive new security system in Europe.
Medinsky noted that the structure in question must take on the character of “a fair, new, modern Yalta and Potsdam that carries the spirit of Helsinki 1975 and responds to contemporary realities”.
The Russian official argued that if such a system were established, peace lasting for decades, or even centuries, could be secured in Europe.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also announced that Moscow possesses its own position paper on how a new security architecture in Eurasia should take shape.
Lavrov stated that Russia hopes the Washington administration will “maintain its determination to pursue dialogue aimed at achieving an honest balance of interests where nobody’s security is impaired”.
Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the country has no intention of attacking Europe.
Pointing out that they have no reason to fight NATO countries, Russian President Vladimir Putin previously said: “We have no interest whatsoever, neither geopolitical nor economic, political nor military.”
In a statement in October, Putin said Russia has no plans to attack anyone “in 2029, in 2030, or in the year 2050”.
On the other hand, Putin claimed that “all NATO countries are fighting Russia” and stated that the Russian military is currently the most combat-ready armed force in the world.
Following the contacts in Abu Dhabi, Kushner announced that he and Witkoff would travel to Moscow.
Explaining that they plan to meet Putin during the visit to discuss European participation in negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict, Kushner argued that the parties could make “far greater progress” if the Russian leader consents to such involvement.
Yury Ushakov, aide to the Russian president, stated that the US special envoys will arrive in Moscow on 12 November, with the planned meeting with the Russian president scheduled for the first half of the day.
Diplomacy
Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks
US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.
According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.
This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.
US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.
Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”
According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.
White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.
Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.
Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.
In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.
Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.
Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.
Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.
Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.
On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.
Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.
On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”
The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”
Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.
On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.
According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”
Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSecular dress code dispute exposes deeper Türkiye-Azerbaijan strains
-
Europe7 days agoEU urges citizens to prepare 72-hour survival kits for crises
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina expands Africa arms sales, displacing France and Western rivals
-
America2 weeks agoBolsonaro reportedly leaves Brazil on jet linked to scandal-hit firm
-
Diplomacy1 week agoProtesters storm Kyiv site holding soldiers over torture allegations
-
Russia2 weeks agoPutin proposes Arctic energy cooperation to US to ease gas sanctions
-
Europe1 week agoPro-Ukraine Republicans in US Congress dwindle after departures
-
Europe1 week agoLow EU gas stocks risk stoking global prices, IEA report warns
