Connect with us

ASIA

Afghanistan is not a terrorism staging ground: Taliban

Published

on

The Pentagon has reported that Afghanistan has become a significant coordination site for the Islamic State (IS), also known as the Daesh terrorist group as the group has plans to carry out attacks across European countries and Asia with aspiration to reach the US.

According to a leaked Pentagon assessment report seen by The Washington Post, the IS has been developing a “cost-effective” model for external operations that relies on resources from outside Afghanistan, operatives in target countries, and extensive facilitation networks.

The Post says that at least there have been at least nine specific plots coordinated by IS leaders in Afghanistan, with the FIFA World Cup in Qatar – held last December – as well as embassies, places of worship and business centers.

The number plots, the documents reveal, rose to 15 in February. The documents reveal that the IS has been persistent in its efforts to obtain expertise in creating chemical weapons and acquire and operate drones.

The report also said that IS has taken advantage of Afghanistan’s weakened security under the Taliban to expand its network and operations in the country.

Taliban denies Washington Post’s report on Daesh

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has strongly denied Washington Post’s report, saying that Daesh has no place inside Afghanistan.

Taliban’s head of Qatar-based Political Office, Suhail Shaheen said that Daesh has been suppressed in Afghanistan and the operation continues to further eliminate them.

The report Washington Post’s claimed to have obtained, is not according to the ground reality in Afghanistan and the report has content based on their “personal wish”, he added.

Shaheen said that in fact there is no physical presence of Daesh in Afghanistan compared to the past years during the invasion.

Daesh has been suppressed

A local political analyst, Ajmal Jamalzada said that Taliban are new and the age of Islamic Emirate is around 21 months. “If we see, and the Taliban rule since August 2021, we can easily get an idea that Daesh is not posing any serious threat to the regional countries,” Jamalzada told Harici.

He said that Daesh has been suppressed and it no longer poses threat to Afghanistan as well to the regional countries and behind.

The Taliban has time and again assured the neighboring countries that they will not let anyone use Afghanistan’s soil against them.

“We want to have a good relationship with everyone. We understand their concern. Terrorism is a big issue, but we are firm in the fight against them,” a Taliban official said.

Daesh is not posing a major threat internally and externally, the official told Harici. Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said that a high-level meeting had just been concluded among the top security and defense officials where they agreed to carry out a comprehensive operation nationwide to tame the Daesh rebels.

Taliban doubts Washington Post’s report impartial

The news leaked by the Washington Post is nothing but mere propaganda to show the world that the Taliban is not capable of dealing with Daesh, the official said.

“The US government under Biden rule is not happy with the Taliban despite the fact that we took practical measures in the fight against terrorism. Biden also seized our money,” he said, calling on the US to stop spreading propaganda against the Taliban.

There were tens of thousands of foreign troops before their collapse in August 2021, but yet they weren’t able to eliminate Daesh, he questioned and added that Taliban are not playing double games and will perish the Daesh.

Daesh appeared in 2014 under the very nose of US and its allied forces and the then Afghan government claimed they defeated Daesh, especially in eastern Nangarhar and Kunar provinces.

What we have come to know is that Daesh has now become a new game for the US, the official said. “I call upon our people first to report about Daesh and suspicious activities in their community if there is any. The nascent government of Taliban must stand ready to deal with Daesh before the US play any new game,” he added.

There is now doubt that Daesh is not a big threat as they are being portrayed by the Western media outlets, he said.

He said that the Taliban security officials are not turning a blind eye over the Daesh threat, but the group is not as strong as they are being painted by the media.

The region and the world must not forget that the Taliban had conducted several operations against Daesh in various parts of the country, where key Daesh members were killed and several others were wounded – many more, including foreigners were detained. Women and kids are among the Daesh detainees.

Taliban forces since August 2021 have been conducting raids on Daesh hideouts and assured to continue counter-terrorism operations.

“Unless the world leaders, we don’t discuss and talk rather we took action to perish Daesh,” the Taliban official said.

Kabul wants good ties with world

Taliban Spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said that Taliban want to have a positive engagement with the world, but the International Community is making excuses to recognize their government.

We are now the government and the world as well as Afghanistan will benefit once we are recognized, Mujahid said, accusing the world of coming up with more excuses all the time to escape recognition of the Taliban government.

“We have good ties with everyone. Our relations have been improved with our neighbors, regional and world countries,” he added.

The world did not recognize the Taliban in the last two years and called on the Taliban to honor the rights of women, and girls and let them go to schools and workplaces if they want to be recognized.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey