America
Bolivia in crisis as workers and indigenous groups lay siege to La Paz
A two-week campaign of road closures and blockades led by the Bolivian Workers’ Center (COB), peasant unions, and miners has plunged the administration of President Rodrigo Paz into a deepening crisis, leaving the political capital effectively under siege.
Less than six months after taking office, Paz faces an escalating emergency as widespread protests and barricades paralyze the country’s seat of government. The unrest has emptied markets in La Paz and exhausted critical oxygen supplies in local hospitals.
On Monday, supporters of former President Evo Morales clashed with police in the capital. Protesters are demanding the president’s resignation and the immediate withdrawal of “reforms” they claim represent a neoliberal restructuring of the state.
Despite the blockades expanding to cover nearly the entire country, Paz issued a stern warning on Friday. “Those who attempt to destroy democracy will be imprisoned,” he declared.
The COB initiated the mobilization to demand wage increases, while peasant unions are calling for a regular supply of gasoline. Miners are engaged in separate negotiations for access to additional mining sites, and state school teachers are conducting independent talks regarding salary improvements.
Presidential spokesperson José Luis Gálvez, referring to Morales, stated that while demands are being addressed within economic realities, “there are dark forces attempting to destabilize our democracy.”
Demonstrators’ unified demand: Resignation of President Paz
In addition to the COB, the Tupac Catari United Workers Federation has established barricades across the country. Mining cooperatives dispatched demonstrators carrying dynamite, who attempted to force their way into Plaza Murillo on May 14.
Peasant organizations, which initially mobilized against Law 1720—an agrarian reform measure the government later repealed under pressure—have remained on the streets. They maintain that the concession was insufficient and are now demanding Paz’s resignation.
The “Evistas,” supporters of Morales organized in the tropical Chapare region, launched a six-day march toward La Paz on May 18 to join the ongoing demonstrations.
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference has called for a humanitarian pause and dialogue, reporting that 67 blockades have caused severe shortages of food, medicine, and oxygen in hospitals. The conference attributed three deaths directly to the obstructions.
Paz government remains divided
President Paz continues to assert that he inherited a “bankrupt state.” However, critics condemn his slow response to the worst crisis in 40 years, characterized by chronic fuel shortages and an inflation rate hovering around 20%.
Business organizations estimate that the ongoing protests and road closures are costing the Bolivian economy more than $50 million per day, with approximately 5,000 vehicles currently stranded on national highways.
The Movement Toward Socialism (MAS), which governed Bolivia for two decades under Morales and subsequently Luis Arce, suffered a historic defeat in last year’s elections following a bitter internal feud between the two former leaders.
Morales recently addressed the situation on the X platform, stating: “The government and the right claim I am a political corpse and cannot mobilize anyone, yet they continue to blame me. The uprising cannot be suppressed as long as structural demands regarding fuel, food, and inflation remain unresolved.”
The end of the MAS era has left Bolivia’s political landscape deeply fractured, with no single party emerging as a dominant force. While Paz achieved a surprise electoral victory, the Christian Democratic Party that brought him to power quickly splintered in the legislature. Furthermore, the president remains in an open confrontation with his vice president, former police officer Edman Lara.
Although Paz has secured various investment and loan commitments from international powers, most of these funds have yet to materialize. In an initial policy move, he eliminated fuel subsidies; while this did not immediately trigger protests from a public already weary of shortages, the government’s subsequent import of low-quality gasoline led to an outcry from transport workers over vehicle damage.
The “bad gasoline” scandal has triggered a wave of strikes and protests within the transport sector and led to the resignations of two high-ranking officials at the state oil company.
US support for the Paz administration
The ongoing protests and barricades in Bolivia have caused concern across the region. Eight Latin American governments, ranging from Chile to Costa Rica, recently issued a joint statement rejecting “any action aimed at disrupting the democratic order.”
Neighboring Argentina announced it would launch a week-long humanitarian airlift to address shortages within Bolivia.
The US, seeking to rebuild ties with Bolivia, has expressed support for Paz’s efforts to “restore order for the peace, security, and stability of the Bolivian people.”
On Tuesday, US Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Landau confirmed on X that he had met with Paz to reaffirm US support for the legitimate government. Landau condemned the organizers of the barricades and uprisings, alleging without providing evidence that they receive support from organized crime and drug traffickers.
Calling specifically on Brazil and Colombia to back Rodrigo Paz, Landau guaranteed that President Donald Trump and his administration are working to ensure that “anti-government and anti-order forces” do not prevail.
“I would deeply regret it if the promising new beginning in Bolivia were to fail. It would be detrimental for all countries in the Americas to witness such uncivilized behavior,” Landau stated. A deputy to Senator Marco Rubio also praised Argentina’s support for the Paz administration, noting that the “entire burden” should not fall on the US.
Right-wing Paz government alliance with Trump develops
In April, Bolivia and the US signed a memorandum of understanding on critical minerals, including lithium, establishing a framework for information sharing and exploration of cooperation.
Washington has publicly declared its interest in securing supply chains. The Paz administration presented the agreement as the first step toward a technological partnership that would finally bring Bolivian lithium to international markets.
The Paz government also confirmed that in February 2026, it would allow the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to establish a permanent operational presence in La Paz. This decision reverses Morales’s 2008 move to expel the agency.
Morales’s original decision was based on allegations that DEA activities constituted political surveillance and interference against the MAS government rather than genuine counter-narcotics efforts. The expulsion became a defining symbol of Bolivia’s sovereign independence from Washington’s security apparatus.
The Paz administration has framed the return of the DEA as a “professional law enforcement arrangement.” Foreign Minister Aramayo stated that negotiations are ongoing to define the agency’s areas of cooperation and operational limits.
Colombia warns of potential massacre against Bolivian people
Colombian President Gustavo Petro has sided with the demonstrators, warning that if repression intensifies, it could lead to the “crushing of the Bolivian people” and a “massacre.”
Meanwhile, the Argentine government faces allegations of shipping riot control supplies to Bolivia. Opposition lawmakers in Buenos Aires are demanding an explanation regarding “Hercules C-130” cargo planes traveling to Bolivia.
Rolando Pacheco, a lawmaker from the leftist Alianza Popular (AP) party, suggested the aircraft are not carrying humanitarian aid as the Javier Milei administration claims, but rather equipment for police and military operations to suppress demonstrations.
Digital platforms in Argentina have seen a rise in campaigns inciting hatred against indigenous populations. Simultaneously, Morales noted that Erik Prince, founder of the US private military firm Academi (formerly Blackwater) and an ally of Trump, has called for intervention against “insurgent grassroots movements.”
Threat of a new ‘Operation Condor’
Concerns are mounting that the Bolivian government and the country’s economic elite will move to forcibly suppress the worker-peasant uprising in coordination with right-wing regional governments and the US.
Morales has referred to “Plan Condor 2026,” a purported new version of the 1970s “Operation Condor.” Under that original code name, South American military dictatorships, guided by US intelligence agencies, killed, disappeared, or tortured thousands of dissidents.
In parallel, Bolivia’s economic elites are mobilizing against the protesters. In Santa Cruz, the far-right “Pro Santa Cruz Civic Committee” called for a “March for Democracy” on Thursday, May 21.
In Cochabamba and La Paz, residents of affluent neighborhoods known as “Pititas” have held counter-demonstrations against the barricades, blaming Evo Morales as the primary organizer of the unrest.
Morales has warned that the Paz administration may intensify repression in collaboration with the US and regional right-wing governments, targeting indigenous people and trade unions.
On May 15, Morales claimed on X that the US had ordered the Paz government to conduct a military operation—supported by the DEA and US Southern Command—to detain or kill him.
Morales identified specific military units, including the Army’s Ninth Division in the tropical Chapare region under the command of Colonel Franz Andrade Loza. He alleged Loza was promised a promotion to general and appointment as commander of the armed forces upon the operation’s completion.
He further named an F-10 unit under Lieutenant Colonel Carlos Giménez Ortuño, a former deputy to the defense minister under Jeanine Áñez.
Among the civilians accused by Morales was Carlos Sánchez Berzaín, the former interior minister under Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada, who fled to Miami following the 2003 “Black October” massacre in which security forces killed over 60 protesters. Morales also named Deputy Minister of Social Defense Ernesto Justiniano, who is reportedly in Washington.
The documents supporting these claims were allegedly leaked by police officers opposed to the operation.
America
Pentagon breach exposes personal records of three million people
A cyberattack targeting the US Department of War’s personnel database has resulted in the leak of personal information belonging to approximately 3 million people.
Speaking to ABC News, a Pentagon official stated that the system accessed by unauthorised individuals contained the records of 2,760,000 living persons and 294,000 deceased individuals.
The Military Times portal, which first broke the news, had reported the number of affected individuals as approximately 4 million based on two sources. The Pentagon official subsequently conveyed different figures to ABC News.
The leak encompasses Social Security numbers and duty information belonging to military personnel and civilian employees. According to an official notification examined by Military Times, the compromised records may also include names, dates of birth, contact information, sex, race, and military occupational specialties.
The unauthorised access to the information system of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) lasted for approximately nine months, between October 2025 and 16 July 2026.
ABC News reported that the access in question was obtained by a small number of third-party users. The vulnerability was closed after it was identified.
The DMDC is considered one of the Pentagon’s primary personnel records centres. More than 60 million records belonging to active-duty personnel, reservists, civilian staff, contractors, retirees, veterans, and military family members are stored at the centre.
The Pentagon has not detected any evidence that the leaked data has been misused. Military Times reported that affected individuals were offered identity restoration and credit history monitoring services.
A similar data breach previously occurred on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) recruitment website, FBIJobs.gov. According to information obtained by ABC News from internal communications and sources, the FBI is considering the possibility that data belonging to its entire staff may have been stolen.
The New York Times (NYT) examined a portion of the stolen FBI records. Home addresses, telephone numbers, official email addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, hiring dates, and emergency contact details for relatives were identified within these documents.
The database also contained unit designations, duty roles, and information regarding the supervisors of personnel. Some records revealed assignments within counterintelligence and counternarcotics units, as well as departments examining threats originating from Russia, China, and Iran.
Ciaran Martin, the former head of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, noted that this type of breach could directly affect the FBI’s operational capabilities.
The hacker group known as ShinyHunters had announced that it had seized medical data and security clearance records alongside files belonging to tens of thousands of active and former FBI employees.
Experts evaluating the matter for the NYT warned that this information could be used to track agents, threaten their families, or compile dossiers by foreign intelligence services.
The ShinyHunters group initially threatened to release the data unless the bureau withdrew an advisory it had published concerning the group’s attack methods.
The group later asserted that it had never intended to leak the information and characterised its action as an advertising campaign.
In a report published in May, Reuters noted that the personal data of US military personnel had been used in surveillance and attack preparations.
According to the agency, Washington’s adversaries gained the ability to pinpoint areas where troops were concentrated by exploiting commercially available location data. US lawmakers at the time criticised the Pentagon for failing to adequately protect the personal data of military personnel.
America
Canada diversifies oil and gas exports away from US
US President Donald Trump’s trade policy and the Washington administration’s push to increase Venezuelan oil imports are prompting Canada to diversify its energy exports.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, recent developments are accelerating Canada’s development of new oil and natural gas projects.
Steps taken by the Ottawa administration, which aspires to become an energy superpower, are seen as potentially strengthening the country’s position in global markets.
In Canada, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer and fifth-largest natural gas producer, the energy sector accounts for approximately one-fifth of total exports.
Almost all of the country’s natural gas exports and approximately 90% of its oil exports go to the US.
The newspaper writes that the trade war with Washington and the atmosphere of confrontation entered into with Iran have heightened Canada’s desire to turn to alternative markets outside the US.
Officials plan to increase shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European and Asian markets.
Accelerating infrastructure investments in line with this target, Canada is also shortening approval processes. The government is prioritising the construction of an oil pipeline extending specifically to the west coast.
According to the newspaper’s estimate, if major pipeline projects are implemented, Canada’s daily oil transport capacity could rise to 6.8 million barrels by 2034.
Routes heading to the west coast will make up approximately 30% of this capacity.
The Canadian administration is simultaneously advancing LNG export projects. According to the report, these investments could allow approximately 55% of Canadian natural gas exports to be directed to markets outside the US by the early or mid-2030s.
While the government expands tax incentives for the oil and natural gas sector, the province of Alberta also plans to overhaul its royalty system.
However, the newspaper notes that implementing the new projects requires heavy investment, and the process depends on the final decisions taken by producers as well as the completion of regulatory approval processes.
The expansion of pipeline and LNG infrastructure could gradually reduce Canada’s dependence on the US market while raising its share in the global energy market.
The Canadian Prime Minister’s demand to reduce reliance on the US market had also come to the fore in July.
According to Carney’s statement, the province of Alberta submitted a plan for a pipeline spanning more than 1,000 kilometres to the west coast of British Columbia.
Targeted for completion by September 2027, the line will reach the Pacific coast by following an existing corridor through the mountainous terrain.
This shift in energy comes at a time of strained relations with the US. Donald Trump said that if Canada obtains associate member status in the European Union, he could halt trade with Europe in certain sectors and impose high tariffs.
As reported by the Associated Press, Trump characterised such a rapprochement as a “potentially hostile act”.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had proposed opening the path for Canada to become the EU’s first associate member. The terms of this associate membership status, which is not defined in EU treaties, are not yet clear and require the approval of member states to enter into force.
Canada, which does not seek full membership, aims for maximum rapprochement with the EU.
Following Trump’s return to the White House, relations between Washington and Ottawa deteriorated. The Trump administration, which repeatedly called on Canada to become the “51st state” of the US, introduced additional tariffs.
In July, the US began imposing 50% tariffs on certain Canadian-origin goods.
America
US economic growth outpaces G7 peers amid artificial intelligence boom
The US economy is projected to grow much faster than all other major advanced economies this year, as its domestic policies trigger difficulties across much of the globe.
According to Axios, the global economy has proved surprisingly resilient in the face of successive shocks.
The US stands out within this broader picture. A boom in artificial intelligence investment is helping the country expand far more rapidly than peer economies.
Yet this exceptional performance carries a price: more persistent inflation and interest rates that may need to stay at elevated levels for longer to rein it in.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) projects that the US economy will expand by 2.2% this year.
That rate is roughly double the pace forecast for the eurozone, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Growth is expected to be even weaker in Japan (0.8%) and Canada (0.9%).
This growth gap is expected to persist next year. In 2027, US growth is projected to reach 2.1%, while growth across most other major advanced economies in the rest of the world is forecast to hover around 1%.
The OECD has grown more optimistic regarding the US since June, raising its growth forecast by 0.2 percentage points for 2026 and by 0.3 percentage points for 2027.
This trend contrasts with downward revisions to next year’s growth projections for the global economy overall, the eurozone, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
OECD Chief Economist Stefano Scarpetta told reporters this morning:
“The biggest risk remains the course of the conflict in the Middle East and its impact on the energy market. But there are a number of other risks, some of which appear to have become somewhat more pronounced compared to the June forecasts.”
Scarpetta highlighted rising government bond yields, the risks accompanying the AI investment boom, and the likelihood of extreme weather pushing up food prices.
According to the OECD, the boom in artificial intelligence (AI) has provided the US economy with a powerful shock absorber absent in most other economies.
Rapid growth in AI investment and manufacturing “partially offset” the economic blow dealt by the conflict in the Middle East.
Data centre and technology spending directly bolstered US growth.
The inflation outlook, meanwhile, is proving more stubborn than it appeared several months ago.
The OECD expects headline inflation in the US to fall from 3.6% this year to 2.6% next year.
However, this forecast for 2027 is half a percentage point higher than the figure projected in June.
Core inflation in the US is projected to stand at 3.3% this year, among the highest rates across leading advanced economies, before easing to 2.5% next year.
This stubborn path explains why the OECD expects the Federal Reserve to deliver one more interest-rate increase this year and anticipates rates will remain in the 4% to 4.25% range through the end of 2027.
On the other hand, the AI boom accelerating US growth is beginning to bring its own macroeconomic headwinds.
According to the OECD, long-term borrowing costs in most of these major economies are at their highest levels in at least 15 years.
The organisation argues that heavy borrowing by AI firms has contributed to pushing yields higher, which could elevate costs across the broader economy and leave markets vulnerable if AI profits fail to meet expectations.
America has contributed to making the global economic climate more challenging.
Even though its own economy has so far performed better than nearly all other countries, this resilience comes accompanied by an inflation problem that remains difficult to eliminate.
-
Europe2 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy2 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Europe5 days agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Diplomacy6 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
