Connect with us

ASIA

Four organizations suspend operations in Afghanistan after Taliban bar female staff

Published

on

At least four major foreign aid groups have said they are temporarily suspending their operations in Afghanistan in response to the Taliban’s decision to bar female employees of local and international NGOs from coming to work.

Norwegian Refugee Council, Save the Children, Care Organization and International Rescue Committee are those international organizations that have suspended their operations. In a joint statement they said; “We cannot effectively reach children, women and men in desperate need in Afghanistan without our female staff.”

“Whilst we gain clarity on this announcement, we are suspending our programs, demanding that men and women can equally continue our lifesaving assistance in Afghanistan,” Save the Children said.

Care International Organization in Afghanistan while expressing deep concern about Taliban’s decision to ban women from working in NGOs said that “without women aid workers, NGOs may not be able to reach women, girls, and families, cutting access to aid for half of a population already suffering from a hunger crisis.”

NGOs can’t work without female staff

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) in Afghanistan said that their ability to deliver services rely on the female staff at all levels of our organization. “If we are not allowed to employ women, we are not able to deliver to those in need. Therefore, the IRC is currently suspending our services in Afghanistan,” the IRC added.

Islamic Relief, UNICEF, and MSF Afghanistan also said they can’t work without their female staff.

Meanwhile, Germany’s Development Minister, Svenja Schulze spoke about aid providing to Afghanistan and said “without female employees, organizations cannot continue their work in many areas for half the population.”

Schulze said that since women are not able to work, she is in favor of suspending the current support Germany provides with others for the time being.

Taliban bans women from working?

In a surprise move, the Taliban ordered all national and international non-government organizations to suspend their female staff members until further notice. The announcement faced widespread reactions at national and international levels.

The decision came just days after the Taliban banned women from universities that also drew nationwide-protests and international condmention. The male students abandoned their classes until their female classmates were not attending and also warned to write any exams.

The regressive ban comes as an extension of a similar decision imposed on girls studying in primary schools. When the Taliban returned to power last year, they allowed only primary education for girls. But now they are also banned from going to school. Taliban also told female teachers to stay at home until further announcement.

“We are three educated sisters. I am a teacher, my sister is a doctor and my younger sister is working in a NGO, but now we are jobless,” an Afghan woman Nadia told Harici.

Nadia said that when the ban on women working in all sectors was announced, they started to cry. “We cried a lot that night. We are only the breadwinner. I have an old father, he is also suffering from heart problems,” Nadia lamented.

What we should do now, Nadia questioned, asking the Taliban to reverse the decision otherwise several families will face hunger and poverty.

35 private universities at the brink of collapse

After the announcement of suspension of women from attending universities, at least 35 private universities are now at risk of collapse due to lack of students.

Media officer at the union of private universities, Mohammad Karim Nasiri said at least 35 higher education institutions would be closed due to economic challenges if female students were not allowed to attend the classes.

Founder of Mura educational center, Azizullah Amir said his university had only female students, but now the campus is empty. “Our goal was to provide higher education to the Afghan women, and now when they are not allowed to come, we have to close it,” Amir lamented.

Enayatullah Khalil Hadaf, the Deputy of Dawat University said that they are considering closing the university and will resume activity once all universities reopen.

Ziaullah Hashimi, a spokesman for the Ministry of Higher Education said that they are working to resolve the university problem, but refrained from providing more information.

There are currently 140 private universities active in Afghanistan.

Destructive policies against women

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk has called on the Taliban to revoke immediately a raft of policies that target the rights of women and girls. “No country can develop – indeed survive – socially and economically with half its population excluded. These unfathomable restrictions placed on women and girls will not only increase the suffering of all Afghans but, I fear, pose a risk beyond Afghanistan’s borders,” Turk said.

Turk urged Taliban to “ensure the respect and protection of the rights of all women and girls – to be seen, to be heard and to participate in and contribute to all aspects of the social, political and economic life of the country, in line with Afghanistan’s international obligations.”

In the wake of fragile economic conditions, the decision would have terrible consequences for women and for all Afghan people. Banning women from working in NGOS will deprive them and their families of their incomes at a time when over half of the population of estimated 35 million are already under poverty. The ban also stops the women of their right to contribute positively to the development of their country and to the well-being of their fellow citizens.

NGOs provide critical life-saving services

NGOs and humanitarian organizations provide critical life-saving services for many people and distribution could not be possible sans women employees.

Providing food, water, shelter and healthcare, and some critical programs, such pre- and post-natal and infant care, are only provided by women.

These women are also having leadership roles in these NGOs which are very important in delivering humanitarian aids in Afghanistan.

The ban will significantly impair, if not destroy, the capacity of these NGOs especially during winter when these aid group’s work is more critical. Afghans need humanitarian support at their greatest in general, but during winter in particular.

The Taliban must return women and girls of their inherent rights, and any attempt to relegate them to silence and invisibility will not succeed. There were already protests in favor of women rights, and even some Taliban high-members are against the ban of women’s education and work.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey