Connect with us

Europe

German government faces first major crisis over judicial nominee

Published

on

The German ruling coalition has entered its first major crisis after conservative members of parliament rebelled against a high court candidate supported by the Social Democrats.

Friedrich Merz’s coalition was forced to postpone a vote on the appointment of three judges on Friday after it became clear that the candidates would not receive the necessary two-thirds majority in the Bundestag due to opposition from within the Chancellor’s CDU/CSU bloc.

The crisis also reveals how problematic discontent within the conservative party base can be, as Merz seeks to take on hundreds of billions of euros in public debt to finance defense and infrastructure spending to revive the German economy.

On Friday, the CDU/CSU bloc informed its coalition partner, the SPD, that it would not support the candidacy of law professor Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf. The official reason for the last-minute decision was the need to investigate potential plagiarism allegations that emerged overnight.

The source of the allegations, a blogger and self-described “plagiarism hunter,” suggested on Thursday that there were similarities between the footnotes of the theses of Brosius-Gersdorf and her husband.

Brosius-Gersdorf’s candidacy was controversial even before the allegations surfaced. Some Christian Democrats found her views, particularly on abortion, to be too “left-wing.”

“This attempt to politicize the nomination of Supreme Court judges is an unprecedented event in Germany,” said Andrea Römmele, a political scientist at the Hertie School, speaking to the Financial Times (FT).

The SPD described it as a “smear campaign.” SPD member of parliament Dirk Wiese stated in parliament, “I never would have imagined that we would have debates reminiscent of the appointment of US Supreme Court justices. In recent days, a smear campaign has been waged against a highly respected civil law professor and lawyer whose professional qualifications are beyond doubt.”

Greens deputy group leader Britta Haßelmann said, “Today is a disastrous day for parliament.”

Tensions have also recently arisen within the coalition over the decision to postpone electricity tax cuts for consumers. CSU leader Markus Söder criticized SPD leader Lars Klingbeil for not implementing the cuts, which were also supported by Merz and would have an annual cost of approximately €5.4 billion, in his first budget.

Europe

EIB to unveil 15 billion euro tech initiative to scale European startups

Published

on

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will announce a €15 billion initiative today, in collaboration with EU capitals and private investors, aimed at supporting the growth of European technology companies.

For decades, startups on the continent have struggled to raise the large-scale funding rounds necessary to scale on this side of the Atlantic, frequently turning to US investors or relocating abroad as they expand.

“We are catching up. Now we need to accelerate,” EIB President Nadia Calviño said.

Under the existing European Tech Champions Initiative, the EIB had already pooled resources with six EU governments to establish funds that invest in high-growth companies across the EU.

Calviño described the initiative as “very successful,” noting that it has supported 12 European “unicorn” companies valued at over $1 billion, including the German artificial intelligence translation firm DeepL.

The bank is now expanding the program with a new phase nearly four times the size of the original.

Twenty-five EU governments, alongside private investors such as Santander and Danske Bank, are expected to participate in the program.

This initial €15 billion aims to mobilize up to €80 billion in total investment. Calviño stated that this estimate is based on the multiplier effects achieved under previous programs.

As part of these efforts, the EIB also aims to attract European pension funds, which manage immense pools of capital but have historically allocated fewer resources to technology investments compared to their US counterparts.

In addition to the new funding, Calviño noted that the EIB will create a platform providing a single point of access for existing European scale-up initiatives, including the European Commission’s Scaleup Europe Fund, France’s Tibi initiative, and Germany’s Win initiative.

Continue Reading

Europe

Germany to purchase US Tomahawk missiles to build own long-range strike capability

Published

on

Germany will purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles from the United States and deploy them on German territory, Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Thursday.

The move marks a shift away from planned US deployments and toward Germany establishing its own long-range strike capability.

Merz told lawmakers that he finalized the agreement with the US government during the NATO summit in Ankara, adding that the talks held on Tuesday and Wednesday had exceeded his expectations.

“While we close a critical strategic gap in our defense, we are also working to develop our own European systems and deploy them in Europe,” the Chancellor said.

According to German government sources, Washington committed in a letter of intent signed on Tuesday to approve Germany’s acquisition of Tomahawk missiles and their land-based Typhon launchers in August.

The number of missiles and launchers Germany plans to purchase was not disclosed because the information is classified.

The planned acquisition appears aligned with US President Donald Trump’s pressure on European allies to cover their own security costs, such as by purchasing US weapons.

The fate of the Tomahawk procurement had become uncertain after Trump announced in May that he would reduce the US military presence in Germany.

That development was seen as a cancellation of a plan made under the previous administration to deploy a US battalion equipped with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany.

That original plan was designed as a temporary solution to serve as a strong deterrent against Russia while Europeans developed their own versions of such weapons.

Germany produces its own cruise missile, the Taurus, but its range of approximately 311 miles is three to five times shorter than that of the Tomahawk missiles.

Continue Reading

Europe

Apple loses EU court appeal over Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation

Published

on

The General Court of the European Union has rejected Apple’s challenges against its “gatekeeper” status designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

With this ruling, the company’s designated status for the App Store and iOS remains valid, while its applications regarding iMessage were also rejected.

Apple had argued that the five separate App Stores it operates for the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, and Apple TV should be evaluated as distinct, individual services.

The court rejected this argument, ruling that these stores serve a common purpose of connecting developers and users, regardless of the specific device.

The court also dismissed Apple’s defense that the DMA’s interoperability obligations violate its fundamental rights.

However, it did not conduct a substantive assessment on the legality of this obligation, stating that a direct legal link could not be established between the regulation in question and the determination of “gatekeeper” status.

Following the ruling, Apple argued that the obligations under the DMA “exceed the boundaries of legality and proportionality.” The company asserted that the new rules jeopardize the work it has carried out for years to ensure user privacy and security.

Apple retains the right to appeal the decision, though a company spokesperson did not comment on whether there are plans to do so.

Apple previously declared that DMA rules prevented the launch of the updated version of Siri in Europe, resulting in European users being unable to benefit from the service.

In force in the European Union since 2024, the DMA covers a total of 22 services and products belonging to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft.

The regulation obliges these companies to share certain data with competitors, provide access to user-generated data, and offer verification tools to advertising partners.

Additionally, it prohibits platforms from engaging in anti-competitive practices that favor their own products. Companies failing to comply with the rules face fines of up to 10% of their global turnover, which can rise to 20% in cases of repeated violations.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey