Connect with us

ASIA

IMF’s help is not a long-term solution for Pakistan’s fragile economy: Experts

Published

on

Pakistan has finally secured the approval of $3 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), unlocking the long-awaited lending that could help stabilize the delicate economy of the country, thought in a temporary period. The approval could help ease the nation’s dire need for cash and somehow give a new start for the country to help rescue its economy.

The Executive Board of the (IMF) approved a 9-month Stand-By Arrangement (SBA) for Pakistan for an amount of $3 billion, or “111 percent of quota” to support the authorities’ economic stabilization program, IMF said in a statement.

Indeed, the approval comes at a challenging economic juncture for Pakistan. A difficult external environment, devastating floods, and policy missteps have led to large fiscal and external deficits, rising inflation, and eroded reserve buffers in the fiscal year.

IMF expects the new approval to lead to Pakistan’s economic reform aims to support immediate efforts to stabilize the economy and guard against shocks while creating the space for social and development spending to help the people of Pakistan.

“Steadfast policy implementation will be critical for Pakistan and the success of the program, which requires greater fiscal discipline, a market-determined exchange rate to absorb external pressures, and further progress on reforms related to the energy sector, climate resilience, and the business climate,” the statement added.

Nearly 230 million nations facing acute balance of payment crisis

But experts say that this approval is not a long-time solution for the country where its 230 million nations are facing an acute balance of payments crisis.

The bailout had been frozen since December and the IMF refused to release $1.1 billion of the loan and blamed Pakistani authorities for not complying with the 2019 agreement signed between the IMF and the then Prime Minister Imran Khan.

The hold on the funds was a big headache for the incumbent government and had created fears that the country would default, giving no hope for the country’s economy.

After months of discussion and struggle, finally the ballot has been approved, a Pakistani expert said, but is skeptical the money could solve the longer solution of an economy-starved nation.

In long-term the agreement would fuel further economic crises

“For the time being it may be a relief but in the long-term it would fuel further economic crises in Pakistan,” Shamim Shahid, a Pakistan political expert told Harici.

Inflation in Pakistan touches all time high.

He furthered that “Pakistan’s Non Development and Defense” expenditures are badly affecting its budgetary allocations, developmental and economic sectors.

“Pakistan, if it really wants to end its economic and financial crises, must slash its non development and defense expenditures. With slashing defense expenditures almost all economic crises could be combated and IMF debts may be reimbursed,” Shahid added.

Analysts say that Pakistan needs at least $20 billion in the next two years to pay its foreign loans. The money is included with interest. Meanwhile, the currency value of Pakistan against dollars has dropped significantly.

The currency and inflation is almost out of control, and now all eyes are on the new agreement to at least stabilize the currency and inflation.

Remaining $1.8 billion will be released in two installments

An Islamabad-based writer and expert, Naveed Aman Khan told Harici that at the stage when Pakistan was at the verge of economic collapse the IMF had released $1.2 billion and it is a good sign.

“Remaining $1.8 billion will be released in two installments. By this year Pakistan will have to bear $ 136 billion burden on its shoulders. Last year external loans were $123.57 billion which may reach $152.136 billion by 2027-28,” Khan added.

Khan furthered that foreign reserves are still far beneath country’s level. “China, Saudi Arabia and UAE have extended their cooperation to avoid economic collapse,” he added, calling it a great achievement for the government.

The positive thing is that Pakistan has gone through a number of reforms to meet the demand of the IMF since its mission arrived in the country in February. These changes include revising its 2023-24 budgets. The IMF also demanded the central bank of Pakistan to remain proactive to reduce inflation.

At the same time, reforms in the energy sector which has accumulated $12.58 billion in debt have been a key agenda of the talks between IMF and the Pakistani authorities.

Pakistan’s PM reaction to the agreement

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has welcomed the IMF agreement and said it will help the country improve its economy.

“The approval of the Stand-by Agreement of $3 billion by the IMF’s Executive Board is a major step forward in the government’s efforts to stabilize the economy and achieve macroeconomic stability,” Shehbaz added.

Pakistan primer furthered: “It (agreement) bolsters Pakistan’s economic position to overcome immediate- to medium-term economic challenges, giving the next government the fiscal space to chart the way forward. This milestone, which was achieved against the heaviest of odds and against a seemingly impossible deadline, could not have been possible without excellent team effort,” he added.

Analysts say that the approval of the IMF bailout will also encourage other countries and international financial institutions to help start funding Islamabad to overcome economic challenges.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey