Europe
Merz pushes for 200 billion euro military fund before new parliament convenes
Friedrich Merz, leader of the CDU and likely next Chancellor, is pushing for a special fund of 200 billion euros for the Bundeswehr before the new Bundestag is formed.
The details are said to have already been discussed in talks with the current Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz and the SPD leader and future parliamentary group leader Lars Klingbeil.
CDU and SPD officials want to discuss on Tuesday “ways to overcome strict restrictions on Germany’s public debt and fund the country’s struggling military,” people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg ahead of the meeting.
The source, who asked not to be named, added that Merz wanted “a vote in the Bundestag on the new package, which would be twice as high as the one approved three years ago.”
Jens Spahn, deputy chairman of the CDU parliamentary group, also confirmed that a defence spending package was being discussed. Spahn said on German television, “Friedrich Merz has indicated that he will hold talks, including with the FDP and the Greens. We will see in the coming weeks what kind of decisions we will take and whether we will take them at all.”
The vote must now take place because the AfD and the Left Party (Die Linke) have a blocking minority in the new parliament.
Outgoing SPD parliamentary group leader Rolf Mützenich believes that a reform of the debt brake or the creation of a new special fund is still possible in the old Bundestag.
Mützenich told a meeting of current and new SPD deputies in Berlin on Tuesday that he was ready to do anything, but he also made it clear that such an approach was politically controversial and blamed CDU leader Friedrich Merz for this.
In terms of political and democratic legitimacy, Mützenich described such fiscal policy decisions by the former Bundestag as “walking a tightrope.” Speaking of an approach “based on tactical considerations” that people cannot understand, the SPD leader accused Merz of “throwing his previous position overboard” within “only a few hours” after the election and said that he did not expect anything good “if this is the style of the new government.”
Merz’s style is highly controversial. Despite a new election, the Bundestag has so far met only once with the old composition: In October 1998 a majority voted in favour of NATO’s war of aggression against the former Yugoslavia, which violated international law.
The Left Party, whose votes in the newly elected Bundestag are likely to cause Merz’s plan to fail, criticised the approach.
“The Left Party has always opposed the debt brake and of course we continue to campaign for its abolition or at least a far-reaching reform, but under no circumstances will we accept a deceptive package designed only to enable further armaments,” parliamentary group leader Heidi Reichinnek told the Berliner Zeitung.
Instead, Reichinnek added, there should be extensive investment in education, infrastructure and the transformation of industry.
Katharina Dröge, parliamentary group leader of the Greens, signalled her approval of the armament plans but criticised the CDU’s approach. Dröge said it was a pity that Merz had rejected a reform of the debt brake with a two-thirds majority of CDU/CSU, SPD and Greens for party tactical reasons in the run-up to the general election, because it was urgently needed in view of the difficult situation in security policy.
However, Dröge added that the Greens also believe in more climate protection, improved infrastructure and investment in the economy. In her view, it would be wiser to reform the debt brake than to create a special fund for defence and then another fund for the economy and infrastructure.
Budget expert Jens Südekum pointed out that an amendment to the Constitution in the former Bundestag would risk being overturned by the Federal Constitutional Court.
Instead Merz should present a concrete package of reforms that can win the necessary two-thirds majority, Südekum said.
Even if Germany only wants to meet NATO’s 2% target, the new federal government will have to spend 30 billion euros more on defence each year from 2028 onwards, after the 100 billion special fund for the Bundeswehr expires.
Europe
US plans to withdraw one-third of its fighter jets from Europe under NATO footprint reduction
The United States plans to significantly cut the military forces and capabilities it allocates to NATO operations in Europe, according to reports.
According to a report by The New York Times, which cited two European officials and an official document sent to allies in early June, the prepared plan involves a serious reduction in military presence.
Under the plan, the Washington administration aims to reduce the number of F-16 and F-15E fighter jets it keeps ready for NATO operations in Europe from approximately 150 to 100.
In addition, the plan entails reducing the number of maritime patrol and intelligence aircraft in the region from 26 to 15, and completely withdrawing all eight tanker aircraft previously assigned to the European theater.
The military reduction plan is not limited to aerial assets. The US also reportedly aims to redeploy an aircraft carrier, a missile-equipped nuclear submarine, and their accompanying support ships and air assets from the region to another theater.
Furthermore, the relocation of one of the two strategic bomber groups dedicated to Europe’s defense is envisioned.
According to the newspaper, these decisions, which are expected to take effect soon, will directly impact the alliance’s capabilities in intelligence gathering, tracking Russian submarines, and conducting long-range strikes.
While the US Department of Defense (Pentagon) avoided commenting on specific figures regarding the matter, it limited its response to referencing a recent statement by the US European Command (EUCOM) regarding its intention to review the volume of American commitments in the region.
The New York Times noted that this decision is linked to US President Donald Trump’s administration’s policy of reducing the military presence in Europe and shifting a portion of resources to the Indo-Pacific region.
However, the report also emphasized that despite the planned reductions, the US will continue to maintain one of the largest NATO military footprints on the European continent.
The German magazine Der Spiegel had also reported in late May, citing its own sources, that the US planned to reduce the military forces and capabilities it provides to the alliance.
According to Spiegel’s report, Washington wishes to decrease its participation under NATO’s “Force Model,” which was agreed upon in 2022.
In this process, it is reported that while the US will maintain its participation in Europe’s nuclear deterrence system, European allies are expected to assume the primary responsibility for the continent’s conventional defense.
The report also noted that Washington is increasing pressure on its European partners to develop their own military capabilities more rapidly and reduce their dependence on American support.
An earlier analysis in the British magazine The Economist reported that alternative military command mechanisms were being discussed in Europe in preparation for a potential decrease in the US role within the alliance or the possibility of Washington blocking decisions.
The magazine pointed out that a rapid reduction of the US military contribution could complicate plans by European nations to gradually replace American capabilities in areas such as intelligence, communications, and missile defense.
Europe
European defense stocks slide as investors question long-term military funding
European defense sector shares have begun to decline following a multi-year upward trend, marking a shift for the continent’s major arms manufacturers.
According to a report by the Financial Times, investors are increasingly concerned that European nations will struggle to secure rapid funding to finance their projected large-scale increases in military spending.
Since the beginning of the year, the Stoxx Europe Targeted Defence index, which tracks Europe’s largest defense companies, has fallen by more than 15%. During this period, shares of prominent firms such as BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Thales, Leonardo, and Rheinmetall have remained under pressure.
Following the start of the military campaign in Ukraine, defense industry shares rose rapidly on expectations that governments would actively purchase weapons and expand their defense budgets. However, investors have now grown skeptical about whether these plans can be fully implemented.
Indeed, several states have already encountered difficulties in executing their defense programs. Germany decided to withdraw from a joint fighter jet project with France valued at approximately €100 billion, while Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis indicated that his country might not even be able to reach the current NATO defense spending target of 2%.
Analysts note that investors now want to see concrete contracts, orders, and profit growth from companies, rather than relying solely on promises of budget increases.
Another factor driving the decline in share prices is the shifting nature of warfare. Investors are increasingly pivoting away from manufacturers of tanks and other heavy military vehicles toward companies that produce unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), missiles, and advanced military technology.
As a result of this trend, shares of French drone manufacturer Parrot have gained approximately 36% since the start of the year, while shares of Swedish military IT firm MilDef have risen by approximately 60%.
Previous declines in defense stocks
The drop in European defense shares is not without precedent. In August last year, shares experienced a sharp decline following a meeting at the White House between US, Ukrainian, and EU leaders.
In November, shares fell to their lowest level since late August after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy indicated readiness to work on a US-proposed plan to end the conflict.
During that period, the aerospace and defense sector index recorded a 3.3% decline, underperforming the broader Stoxx index, which lost 1%, with German companies experiencing the most significant losses.
Another sharp decline occurred in April this year following US-led strikes against Iran. Despite ongoing conflicts, production delays and uncertainties surrounding military budgets have continued to unnerve investors.
European Commission prepares to increase defense budget
Conversely, in April, the European Commission announced that it would invest €1.07 billion in 57 defense projects designed to support Europe’s core defense capabilities.
Of this funding, €675 million was allocated to 32 initiatives aimed at developing defense capabilities, while €332 million was designated for 25 research projects.
The European Commission stated that these investments will support the goals outlined in the EU’s defense readiness roadmap through 2030 and provide critical funding for four key flagship initiatives.
During the same period, it was reported that the European Commission plans to increase defense spending to at least €131 billion in the new seven-year budget covering the years 2028 to 2034.
Andrius Kubilius, the EU Commissioner for Defense and Space, noted that this figure represents an unalterable “absolute minimum.”
Europe
Berlin and Israel Aerospace Industries partner to launch defense technology innovation hub
The State of Berlin and Israeli defense group Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) plan to establish an innovation center in the German capital focusing on aerospace, defense, security, and dual-use technologies.
The agreement was signed this week on the sidelines of the ILA Berlin Air Show by Berlin Mayor Kai Wegner and IAI President and CEO Boaz Levy.
Wegner said in a statement:
“Berlin is the most suitable location for an aerospace and defense innovation center. Given the global crises we face, establishing such a center in our capital, thereby supporting aerospace investments and strengthening ties between established companies and entrepreneurs, is of great importance. The agreement we signed with IAI will bring world-class aerospace and defense expertise to our ecosystem. Our goal is to make Berlin the number-one city for innovation.”
Levy said the memorandum reflects their “long-term relationship and commitment to Germany, as well as their vision to build deep and strategic partnerships that bring together innovation, industry, and operational expertise.”
The IAI CEO pointed out that by integrating the group’s technological capabilities into Berlin’s “dynamic innovation ecosystem,” they are creating a platform that “combines groundbreaking technologies with real-world operational needs and global market opportunities.”
“At the same time, this cooperation represents another important step toward expanding IAI’s industrial footprint in Germany through local capabilities, skilled employment, and long-term technological growth,” Levy said.
IAI was the prime contractor for the Arrow-3 missile defense system delivered to Germany at the end of last year.
Berlin views this system as the cornerstone of its goal to play a leading role in the European Sky Shield Initiative.
IAI also supplies Heron TP unmanned aerial vehicles to the German Air Force.
Under the agreement, the planned center will support startups operating in the fields of aerospace, defense, security, and dual-use technologies through accelerator programs, partnerships, pilot projects, and proof-of-concept projects.
The program will foster cooperation with local and international initiatives, support the development of industrial applications, strengthen collaboration among industry, policymakers, researchers, and investors, and advance local industrial development by increasing manufacturing capacity, creating jobs, and driving long-term technological growth.
The memorandum of understanding represents a significant milestone in IAI’s expansion in Germany and Europe.
Berlin and IAI will work closely to further increase the company’s industrial presence in Berlin, including developing local production capacities and creating highly skilled jobs.
By expanding its presence in Berlin, IAI aims to support technological innovation, develop industrial expertise, and contribute to sustainable economic growth for the local economy.
IAI has successfully launched and run international accelerator programs worldwide, including Catalyst in the US, NeuSPHERE in India, and ASTRA in Israel.
-
Europe2 weeks agoUkraine reburies OUN leader Melnyk as Poland and Israel condemn honoring of wartime nationalist figures
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina launches patrols east of Taiwan after Japan and Philippines open maritime boundary talks
-
America2 weeks agoUS Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoUN faces insolvency risk as US and China delay membership payments
-
Europe1 week agoHungary’s new PM Magyar vows absolute ban on illegal migration, challenging Brussels over fines
-
Middle East2 weeks agoReport challenges official assessments of damage from Iranian attacks on US military assets
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoZelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
-
Opinion2 weeks agoChinese diplomacy ascendant under Xi: All roads lead to Beijing
