Connect with us

Asia

Pakistan’s political soap opera: Politico-judicial crisis touching its peak

Published

on

Government and the military establishment as well utterly failed in bringing its choice constitutional amendment, enabling sitting Chief Justice of Pakistan to remain in office for another term and blocking ways for pro-Imran Khan judge namely Syed Mansoor Ali Shah. The government failed as it didn’t mustered support of some smaller groups having very thin but effective representation in the parliament-both Upper and Lower houses.

So far chief of his faction Maulana Fazal Ur Rahman has refused to support the proposed 26-A amendment in the Constitution of 1973. And second is nationalist Awami National Party. JUI(F) has representation of five MNA’s and two Senators whereas the ANP has a strength of three in Upper House (Senate). Besides these two parties, Mutahida Quami Movement, Baluchistan National Party and other smaller groups having certain reservations over the proposed amendment draft.

In fact, the government didn’t made public or unveiled the proposed draft, therefore, it caused some suspicious and confusion. Earlier the government claimed that through proposed 26-A, they wants to repeal some parts of 19th constitutional amendments, which has granted maximum powers to Chief Justice of Pakistan in appointment of judges. But later the proposed drafts included some parts making mandatory involvement of military establishment in appointment of judges, banning of political parties and arrests of people on the charges of anti-state activities etc. On such grounds, now after JUI(F) and ANP, certain other political parties are also opposing the proposed draft.

Almost all top judiciary judges having a soft corner towards Imran Khan

The case of Pakistan Tehrik Insaf is very different as its almost leaders are using its effective strength in both upper and lower houses to force the powerful military establishment for a deal. Almost PTI top leaders are playing role of ROBOTS and they are following dictations of their jailed leader. No doubt that almost top judiciary judges are known for having a soft corner towards Imran Khan and his party men but IK and co are still ahead with dozen of cases registered against them in different charges. Most of these cases are pertained to misuse of offices, corruption and criminals.

The JUI(F) of Maulana Fazal Ur Rahman, ANP and BNP are unanimously demanding establishment of a Constitutional court for hearing and disposing off of cases pertained to constitutional matters. Earlier the nationalists and progressive minded political parties and politicians had demanded a a Federal Court for settling issues amongst the federating units ( provinces, and between provinces and the federal government. But now when the superior courts are consuming maximum time in settling, hearing and disposing off of constitutional matters, therefore, JUI(f), ANP and others realized importance’s of a Constitutional Court.

Future of Pakistan is at stake due to alarming economic crisis and deteriorating of security situation

No doubt to mention that the matter couldn’t be settled with giving or getting back powers of judiciary. The real issue is rest with the military establishment – which eyeing on further strengthening its influence over almost civil-politico matters. Since inception of the country in 1947, the military establishment-considered true and lawful legacy of British Colonial system in the region (Asia) didn’t misused any chance of making crippled and destablised the civil-politico system in Pakistan. Most recent move was patronization of PTI against two top political parties like PPP and PML(n) in Center and Nationalist ANP in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Destablisation of nationalist ANP in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was and is aimed at continuation of its efforts for having influence over internal and external policies of Afghanistan. Such aims are still workable but the aims of destablisation of PML(N) and PPP at central level utterly failed and now the PTI’s artificial popularity become a serious threat to no other than powerful military establishment.

Amidst  alarming economic and final crises and deteriorating security situation, the growing politico-judicial crises is putting future of the country at stake. Internally, the highly educated but jobless  youngsters are lacking confidence in better future of the country whereas externally almost members of the international community are unhappy due to ‘patronisation of hard line religious groups and factions.’ At this crucial stage, maximum responsibility rests with no other than military establishment to review its own acts and actions and let the political leadership to put house in order. Only political leadership is capable of pulling the country out of these crises like of 1969 and 1972.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey