Connect with us

Middle East

Prevalence of religious hypocrisy

Published

on

After the return of the Taliban, hundreds of thousands of Afghan citizens went to European countries and the US, where they started a new life in the shadow of a different society and culture. In the meantime, one of the frequent scenes was the conflict of behavior of these citizens in Afghanistan and now in the West.

When a famous lady lived inside the country, she considered herself bound to wear the usual clothes in Afghanistan and was even careful not to publish her photo on social media outlets, but the same person as soon as she set foot in Europe, America or Australia, her way of dressing changed drastically and one of the first changes that appeared was to wear a mini dress and bare his head and neck.

Also, in the case of men, some of whom could not hear even a single word from their language in criticizing the current situation or the need to revise popular religious views, but these same people, after leaving the country and feeling immune from possible punishments, relentlessly attacked religious beliefs. They started and ridiculed the popular opinions in the country and also acted as revolutionary in criticizing the ruling policy and prominent politicians.

Another example, There were a large number of people who had jobs in the republic and had become wealthy, which they are thankful to the blessing of that system and were comfortable in their lives and did not show any kind of dissatisfaction with the existing situation. However, these people as soon as the republic system collapsed, they became first-class critics and suddenly opened their throats in praise of the “Emirate” system and even tried to build an image that they were already with the Taliban even during the Republic system.

What are the reasons for this behavior-conflict and what factors are involved?

Unfortunately, hypocrisy and pretense are one of the chronic and long-lasting diseases in our society, and the experts and academicians in the past have already spoken about this and proposed solutions. Despite this, the fact is that until the aggravating factors of this disease are removed from society, it should not be expected that hypocrisy will not become a second habit of citizens.

It seems that people use pretense and hypocrisy as a shield to protect themselves from possible calamities and disasters, and consider this method necessary to survive in unstable and chaotic conditions.

Although experts have tried to criticize pretense and hypocrisy for a long time, but the criticism of this phenomenon is not fruitful without doing something to provide a dignified life for humans. Until the root of this problem is not dealt with, there is no hope to improve the situation.

Religious governments are one of those governments that promote hypocrisy and hypocrisy

The Taliban government, is unfortunately, currently one of the worst examples of religious government in the world. This government gives itself the right to interfere in the smallest issues of the daily lives of the people and even impose rules for citizens on the type of clothing, beard and hair.

In the shadow of such governments that impose a certain way of life on people, the people are forced to turn to hypocrisy and pretense and choose a special way of dressing and a special way of life in order to be safe from any punishment of the government.

As soon as these people get out of the realm of totalitarian governments, they completely change their faces and reveal their inner selves. These days, if you walk the streets of the big cities of Afghanistan, such as Kabul, Balkh, and Herat, you will see the absolute majority of people with the same clothes and appearance, and fewer people are willing to take risks and, for example, shave their beards or grow their hair in a different way. This shows the intensity of citizens’ fear of the Taliban.

The society is blame for such messy rules

Although the Taliban regime is currently trying to establish an iron rule and impose a certain lifestyle on the citizens, if we do not ignore the truth, the Afghan society is also to blame for this situation. The citizens of Afghanistan often take the same layer and appearance from religion and do not have access to its depth and meaning.

It is that religious appearanceism is very common in the society, and of course, what has happened recently is that the political government is also in harmony and compatible with the majority of people in the appearanceism and giving priority to religious rites and rituals and disregarding the essence of religion.

If you want to gain the respect of the citizens and achieve a desirable social status and benefit from the facilities, you have to adhere to religious appearances and attend congregational prayers, let your beard grow long, carry a rosary in your hand, and chant religious slogans. Talk about piety, purity and fear of God. In such a situation, the majority of people act according to instinct and pretend to be religious and pious, but deep down they do not believe in these words at all.

Oppressive systems turn people into worthless and dishonorable creatures

In a society where bigotry is rampant, hypocrisy becomes common, and efforts are made to hide one’s opinion, because exposing one’s political or religious opinion threatens one’s life, property, and reputation. The higher the concentration of prejudice, the more hypocrisy spreads and becomes the rule of life. In such a society, reasoning and logic do not achieve the desired position and people see their interest in being with power and force.

In these societies, the protection of property and life is prioritized and opinion loses its importance. The members of such a society always hide themselves behind masks.

To build a good society, freedom should be considered before anything else. In a society where there is no freedom, people’s lives suffer from all kinds of plagues, including the disease of hypocrisy and pretense. Hypocrisy and pretense should not be considered only as a mental illness, but it should be considered as a phenomenon that spreads humiliation and slander and brings society to ruin and endangers social integration.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey