Connect with us

MIDDLE EAST

Syria after Assad; A look at the future and possible scenarios

Published

on

The rapid fall of Bashar al-Assad’s government by the rebels and its opponents in less than two weeks surprised the region and all Middle East experts. Before the fall of Aleppo, few people imagined that Bashar Assad’s government would fall apart so soon and his opposition forces would take power. Despite the large presence of Iran and Russia, Assad felt minimal security and did not imagine that the foundations of his power would collapse so soon.

But if we look at his rule after 2011 and put the pieces of the puzzle together, the signs of the fall of his rule are evident since the beginning of the civil war.

During the 14 years of civil war and the conflict with ISIS, the Syrian army and the economy of this country were very worn out and they did not have the spirit to continue the war. On the other hand, there were numerous reports that the salaries of the Syrian forces were severely inadequate and sometimes their salaries were not paid on time.

The Syrian economy was torn apart due to the war and double international sanctions, and the living conditions of its citizens were not suitable either. One of the reasons why the people did not show resistance against the successive victories of the rebel forces and sometimes welcomed it was the way of Assad’s governance and the widespread corruption in his government.

On the other hand, the domino fall of the Syrian provinces, the loss of the narrative of the war, widespread corruption, the lack of spirit to continue the war and finally the escape of the president, have many similarities with the fall of Kabul and the Afghan government.

But what can be imagined about the upcoming scenarios?

Regarding the scenarios facing Syria, three futures or scenarios can be imagined. Since the fall of Syria is very similar to the fall of Afghanistan in 2021, and on the other hand, insurgent forces have been able to take over the government twice in Afghanistan, the example of Afghanistan can be used to better outline the future scenarios of Syria.

A.—Afghanistan after 2021

One of the scenarios is that the Syrian Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), with a history of being close to al-Qaeda and a limited period of contact with ISIS, will seize all power in Syria and establish a highly repressive and religious government, similar to the Taliban in Afghanistan.

This scenario seems probable due to the intellectual similarities between the writing staff of HTS and the Taliban. Just as the Taliban had a close relationship with al-Qaeda, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham was also initially part of the al-Qaeda network in Syria, which at that time was known as the Nusrat Front. The group was even considered part of ISIS at one point, until it publicly announced that it had severed ties with al-Qaeda and no longer wanted to pursue the cause of global jihad.

In fact, the reconstruction of the identity and brand of this group started from that point. They changed their name from Jabhat Nusrat to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and tried to present a more moderate image. Their goal was to show the international community, especially Western countries, that they face no threat from this group.

This approach may help HTS to play a central role in the Syrian power structure in the near future, similar to the role the Taliban assumed in Afghanistan after 2021.

The possible scenarios

What makes this scenario possible and drives it forward is the history and ideology of the HTS. Ideologically, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is not much different from al-Qaeda and ISIS. As mentioned earlier, this group is a joint product of ISIS and al-Qaeda.

The experience of governing this group in Idlib in recent years also strengthens this assumption. Numerous reports have been published about human rights violations under the rule of this group, which have raised serious concerns of many international observers.

These factors, along with the history of the close association of the HTS with extremist jihadi groups and their repressive behavior, increase the possibility that if this group comes to power, it will create a repressive and extremist government structure in Syria.

Blockers

Several factors can block the realization of this scenario or reduce its probability:

1- The presence of nationalist forces

The Syrian Liberation Army, as one of the main forces that played a role in overthrowing the Assad regime, can be a serious obstacle against the complete domination of the HTS. These forces have nationalist tendencies.

2- International supervision

Although international supervision has had limited effectiveness in recent years, it can still play a deterrent role. Interference and diplomatic and economic pressures from global and regional powers can challenge the process of gaining power of an extremist government.

3- Resistance of Syrian citizens

A large part of Syrian citizens does not have a good middle ground with absolute theocracy. This issue became evident during the presence of ISIS in the region, when many people directly or indirectly resisted the presence and ideology of this group. This public attitude can make the writing staff of Sham face a challenge in creating a government similar to the Taliban or ISIS.

These factors can change the balance of power in favor of more moderate forces and prevent the formation of an extremist government in Syria.

– Afghanistan in the 1980s: Civil war between the victorious forces

The presence of several forces that contributed to the fall of the Assad regime strengthens the hypothesis that the Syrian civil war is not over yet and may enter a new phase. It is likely that the battle for control of power will take place between the conquering forces this time.

This scenario has already been observed in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Jihadi forces that overthrew the government of Dr. Najibullah, after the victory, engaged in internal disputes and started a new war to seize power. These conflicts entered Afghanistan into a long period of instability and violence.

In Syria as well, the ideological diversity and political differences between the victorious forces could be the basis for a new civil war, this time between different groups to dominate the government and strategic areas.

The possible scenarios

Several factors can enhance this scenario and increase its probability of occurrence:

1- The presence of regional powers and their conflicting interests

– Turkey: Considering Turkey’s military presence and its policies towards the border areas, it seems that its role will be decisive in shaping the future of Syria.

– Iran and Russia: These two countries, which have invested a lot on the Assad regime and the political structure of Syria, are unlikely to give up their interests in this country easily.

– Qatar and Saudi Arabia: Arab countries, especially Qatar and Saudi Arabia, will try to play a role in the future of Syria, considering their ideological conflict and political interests.

2- Lack of ideological unity among the conquering groups

The diversity of thinking and deep ideological differences between the victorious forces, including the Syrian Democratic Army, the Syrian Democratic Army, and the Kurdish groups, can be the basis for new internal conflicts. The history of past conflicts between these groups, especially between the Kurds and the Syrian opposition, increases the possibility of a new civil war.

3- History of confrontation between victorious groups

Historical rivalries and current tensions between different forces, such as the Syrian Democratic Army and the Syrian Democratic Army, show that the lack of convergence between the conquering groups can lead to new conflicts. This situation, similar to the experience of Afghanistan in the 1980s, strengthens the possibility of conflict between the victorious forces.

These drivers show that the regional competition and lack of internal cohesion between the conquering groups can bring Syria into a new stage of civil war.

The possible scenarios

Several factors can prevent a new civil war between the conquering forces in Syria:

1- Abu Mohammad Jolani’s actions to create unity

The leader of the HTS, Abu Mohammad Jolani, has recently started efforts to forge an alliance between the conquering forces and prevent chaos in Syria. These measures can be a serious obstacle against the occurrence of internal conflicts between different groups and increase the possibility of cooperation and coordination between these forces.

2- Kurds’ readiness to cooperate

Kurdish forces have also announced that they are ready to cooperate with other groups. This process, if properly managed, can prevent the escalation of disputes and internal conflicts and help create a stable political structure.

3- The potential for a common political process

If these efforts for unity and cooperation between different groups go well, we can hope that instead of entering a new war, Syria will enter a stage of political and social reconstruction.

These deterrent factors indicate that, if managed intelligently, the repetition of the Afghanistan scenario of the 1980s in Syria can be avoided.

The last: General elections

The third scenario, which is known as the ideal scenario, is to move towards holding general and democratic elections. In Afghanistan, such a process never took place, and powerful groups, by seizing power, prevented the holding of real elections.

Currently, many Syrian citizens wish for elections to be held so that they can vote for the people of their choice and have a voice in political decisions.

However, implementing this option will not be easy, especially considering the current situation in Syria. Several challenges, including humanitarian crises, internal tensions and lack of cohesion between different groups can prevent this scenario from being realized.

Strong and effective international monitoring can be a driving factor for holding democratic elections. This monitoring can help provide the necessary conditions for holding a transparent and fair election and rebuild the trust of Syrian citizens in the political process.

If this scenario is realized, it can be considered as a turning point in the history of Syria and an opportunity to build a better future for this country. According to the mentioned scenarios, it is possible to form other scenarios and future developments will determine which direction Syria will go.

On the other hand, there are concerns that ISIS will take advantage of the resulting chaos and power vacuum. ISIS cells are still present in some areas of Syria, such as Deir ez-Zor and Al-Bukamal, and the possibility of the re-emergence of this group cannot be ruled out.

Another issue is the possibility of forming a new self-governing region in the Middle East. The existing power vacuum gives the Syrian Kurds the opportunity to form an independent region similar to the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. The Kurds currently rule the northern and northeastern parts of Syria, and they do not want to lose control of their areas in any way.

Turkey does not seem to support this scenario and has particular security concerns about the PKK’s military wing. For this reason, Turkey will probably be one of the barriers to this scenario because he currently considers itself the main winner in the Syrian arena.

Finally, the future of Syria will depend on the complex interactions between these factors and groups, and future developments can shape the future of this country.

MIDDLE EAST

Israeli cabinet to approve Gaza ceasefire and prisoner swap deal

Published

on

The Israeli cabinet is expected to meet today to approve a ceasefire and prisoner swap agreement in Gaza. Palestinian sources indicate that the agreement could be signed on or before Friday, 17 January.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is working to ensure the government remains stable, as Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich opposes the deal, according to official Israeli state television KAN.

“If things move quickly, it is likely that the cabinet will meet this afternoon, followed by a government meeting where the deal will be approved,” Israeli officials told KAN.

Israeli Channel 12 television, citing Israeli sources, reported that the details of the prisoner release deal have been agreed upon, and a final response from Hamas is awaited. The news also highlighted that most government members support the agreement.

Reports noted that 18 ministers from the Likud party, led by Netanyahu, six from the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Shas Party, two from the United Torah Judaism party led by Moshe Gafni, and two from the National Right party support the agreement.

On the other hand, three ministers from the Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) party, led by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, and three ministers from the Religious Zionism party, led by far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, oppose the agreement.

KAN reported that Netanyahu met with Smotrich the previous day in an attempt to persuade him to support the deal.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Qatar presents draft agreement to Israel and Hamas for ending Gaza war

Published

on

Negotiations between Israel and Hamas to end the war in Gaza have reportedly made significant progress. An official told Reuters that Qatar presented the parties with a draft final agreement today. The preceding meetings in Doha were attended by the heads of Israel’s Mossad and Shin Bet organizations, the head of Egyptian intelligence, the Prime Minister of Qatar, and Steve Witkoff, special envoy to US President-elect Donald Trump.

Critical 24 hours

The official stated that talks continued until early this morning and emphasized that the next 24 hours would be critical to reaching an agreement. Israel’s Kan radio reported that the parties had received the draft and that the Israeli delegation had briefed its leaders. However, neither Israel nor Hamas has confirmed a final agreement on the draft.

It is understood that the draft includes a ceasefire and the release of hostages. A senior Israeli official noted that if Hamas responds positively to the proposal, an agreement could be reached within a few days. A Palestinian official described the information from Doha as promising, adding that the differences between the parties were diminishing.

Pressure from Trump and Biden

Before taking office, Donald Trump announced that he would impose harsh sanctions if Hamas did not release the hostages. President Joe Biden, in the final days of his term, made intense efforts to reach an agreement before leaving office. In a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Sunday, Biden emphasized the need for a ceasefire and increased humanitarian aid.

Since the start of hostilities in Gaza in October 2023, Palestinian health officials report that more than 46,000 people have been killed, settlements have been largely destroyed, and the humanitarian crisis has deepened. While the parties have largely agreed on the mutual release of hostages and prisoners, disagreements remain over the terms of the agreement to end the war. Hamas demands Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza, while Israel insists the war will end only with the elimination of Hamas.

Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s hardline nationalist Finance Minister, criticized the proposed deal, calling it a “capitulation” and “a disaster for national security.”

The outcome of the talks is expected to be finalized in the coming days.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Lebanon elects Joseph Aoun as president, ending two-year crisis

Published

on

The Lebanese parliament elected Chief of Staff Joseph Aoun as president yesterday, marking a significant step in overcoming more than two years of political crisis. This election follows weeks after a fragile ceasefire agreement ended 14 months of conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, occurring at a time when Lebanese leaders are seeking international assistance for reconstruction. Joseph Aoun was the preferred candidate of the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, two countries whose support Lebanon will rely on during the reconstruction process.

Hezbollah had initially supported Suleiman Frangieh, the leader of the Marada Movement and an ally of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. However, Frangieh withdrew from the race on Wednesday and announced his support for Aoun, clearing the way for the latter’s election.

Randa Slim, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Middle East Institute, told the Associated Press that international pressure, combined with Hezbollah’s weakening due to its war with Israel and the diminished influence of its Syrian ally Assad, were key factors leading to yesterday’s outcome.

In the first round of voting, Hezbollah and the Amal Movement cast blank ballots, signaling that “he cannot be elected president without our approval.” Aoun was subsequently elected in the second round. Mohamed Raad, the head of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc, stated, “We postponed the vote to send a message that we are the guardians of Lebanon’s sovereignty and national reconciliation.”

One of Hezbollah and Amal Movement’s key demands during the election process was maintaining control over the finance ministry. An agreement addressing this demand was reportedly reached, particularly in negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Despite international pressure and its diminished military and political strength, Hezbollah demonstrated its decisive influence in the presidential election.

In his victory speech, Aoun proclaimed, “Today begins a new era in Lebanon’s history.” He committed to implementing the ceasefire agreement with Israel, which requires the withdrawal of both Hezbollah and Israeli forces from southern Lebanon. Aoun also pledged to work towards a national security strategy that aims to “dismantle the Israeli occupation and repel its aggression.” He emphasized the need for the Lebanese state to hold a monopoly on the right to bear arms, an apparent reference to Hezbollah’s weapons.

Sami Atallah, founding director of the Beirut-based think tank The Policy Initiative, told the Financial Times: “I don’t think [Hezbollah] could afford to torpedo the process, especially after the war and its consequences for reconstruction and challenges facing the Shia community. They felt compelled to compromise and accept a candidate.”

Joseph Aoun, 60, was educated in the U.S. and has established strong ties with Washington, which funds and trains the Lebanese army. This has earned him the moniker “America’s man.” However, some MPs criticized foreign influence in Lebanon’s internal affairs, with some even combining his name on ballots with those of the U.S. and Saudi ambassadors: “Joseph Amos bin Farhan.”

While Aoun’s election addresses the prolonged presidential vacuum, the next challenge lies in appointing a prime minister and forming a cabinet. The president’s powers are limited in Lebanon, but filling this role was essential before government formation could proceed.

The incoming government faces the daunting task of enforcing the ceasefire agreement, managing reconstruction after the Israel-Hezbollah conflict, and addressing Lebanon’s severe economic crisis. Now in its sixth year, the crisis has devastated the national currency, wiped out savings, and reduced state-owned electricity supply to a few hours daily. In 2022, Lebanese leaders secured a preliminary bailout agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), but progress on the reforms required to finalize the deal has been limited.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey