Connect with us

Asia

Taliban has an enemy to fight – ISIS

Published

on

The US has entered Afghanistan after 9/11 incident in the pretext of fight against terrorism. In that time Afghanistan was home to the Taliban, current Afghanistan ruler, and al-Qaeda terrorist group. The US blamed notorious al-Qaeda for the deadly incident and vowed revenge and was able to kill Osama bin Laden, the founder and first leader of al-Qaeda in Pakistan in 2011 and his successor Ayman al-Zawahiri in a drone strike in Afghanistan just recently.

But the point is that when US entered Afghanistan there were the Taliban government and the presence of only al-Qaeda terrorist group, but how many terrorist groups are operating in Afghanistan now after US ended its 20 years of military presence in August 2021.

So reasonably, only al-Qaeda should have remained. Actually the number is much higher. There are over 20 terrorist groups, including the brutal Islamic State (IS), aka ISIS emerged under the very nose of US presence and the Afghan intelligence backed by the western countries. The group first appeared in 2014, and was taken lightly and even their presence was strongly denied until it carried out several deadly attacks, targeting mosques, shrines, hospitals, mortality clinics, wedding halls, passenger buses, Sikh temple and Hindu Gurdwara and etc… With the scope of these attacks, ISIS has been apparently pursuing an ideology of sectarian war, after failing to do so in Iraq and Syria.

It’s not the stop point, ISIS for years approached Taliban commanders, al-Qaeda fighters, Uzbekistan Islamic Movement and East Turkestan Islamic Movement with full preparations to further cement ties and find a strong foothold inside Afghanistan with their support.

Abdulrauf Hadim, one of the famous Taliban commanders joined ISIS and some members also pledged loyalty to the group after the death of Mullah Omar, the founder and leader of Taliban in Pakistan in 2013, but it was announced publicly in 2015.

Taliban is determined to fight against ISIS

But the Taliban has never shown any mercy to the ISIS, and never accepted it. Taliban has a strong resolve to fight ISIS terrorists and eliminate them from Afghanistan.

Taliban arrested over 670 ISIS militants in the last three months of their ruling starting from August 15, and also 25 hideouts of the group were destroyed in capital city Kabul, and eastern Nangarhar province during the span of time. Taliban also accused the former government of Ashraf Ghani for strengthening ISIS in order to use them against the Taliban during the war.

But still ISIS is posing a great threat to Afghanistan and also as a matter of worry for countries in the neighborhood and beyond. ISIS continues spilling blood in Afghanistan and intensified its attacks in the past several months and Taliban is seemingly are scrambling to quell the curtail terrorism waged by the terrorist group. In last several months, the terror group was particularly gruesome with its deadly attacks in Balkh, Kunduz, Kabul in which at least 100 people were killed and 200 more were wounded.

Russia, China and Iran can help

ISIS is following a revisionist policy by dividing the world into two – Darul Islamd and Darul Kufr, and a zero-tolerance or acceptance of the nation-state. This is the core reason which Russia, China and Iran among other regional countries described the presence of ISIS in Afghanistan as a big threat to their territorial integrity as well as peace and security of the region.

A senior Taliban official speaking to Harici said that ISIS is being used against the Taliban by the foreign powers as a pressure tool to terrify the current government and also to undermine the capability of the intelligence department.

“We will stop this deadly conspiracy against our innocent people. We started working day and night to neutralize ISIS terrorists,” the official told Harici, wishing to remain anonymous.

Without mentioning the name of any country, the official said some western countries are not happy with the Taliban ruling and shifted to support the ISIS to force the Taliban to accept their demands. “We fought for independence, we never accept any illogical demands of the foreign countries,” he said, and assured the Afghan citizens that Taliban security forces will ensure peace and security of the Afghans.

It poses a threat to the entire region

“ISIS is a phenomenon which is not only posing a threat to Afghanistan but to the region and beyond,” an Afghan expert Dr. Hikmat told Harici.

Concerns relating to ISIS have several dimensions and aspects, and according to Hikmat, it’s a project being run by the regional and world powers against the current Afghan government under Taliban leadership.

It’s a crystal fact that ISIS is fighting the current government, but the positive point is that Taliban has a clear standpoint against this brutal group, and they have already arrested dozens of them.

“But still there is a huge concern. If the interests of regional countries and beyond are dispirited in Afghanistan, they may turn to use ISIS against each other and abuse the Afghan soil,” Mr. Hikmat said.

In such a scenario, Hikmat said that China, Russia, Iran and Central Asian countries have their own concerns, and they support any efforts against ISIS for the sake of peace in the region.

There is a need for formation of a regional coalition against ISIS, otherwise, the fire will soon erupt to other countries and dealing with a bigger wild snake would be highly costly.

At the same time other extremist groups who have inactive presence could soon turn into active. “Extremist groups are not acceptable for the Afghan people, and the killing of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri adds more salt to the wounds of Afghans,” the expert added.

The Taliban, indeed, is fighting against ISIS with a strong commitment and honesty, but at somehow they could not able to control ISIS’s influence and rescue the Afghan people from its scourge of terrorist activities.

Discussions over Pakistan

However, all the blame is attributed to the controversial neighbor Pakistan and has been accused of implementing and taking such projects from “west and east.”

“The Army and intelligence of Pakistan (ISI) working with US and UK to maintain their interests in Afghanistan and unfortunately the wrong policy of Pakistan lead to the influence of terrorist groups into the region,” the war pundit believes.

Optimistic and pessimistic scenarios

Meanwhile, Taliban can benefit from growing regional perceptions of ISIS as a grave threat, repeatedly like Russia, China and Iran could help Taliban to fight this group. It also raises a chance for the Taliban to receive support from other countries for counter-terrorism purposes.

In an optimistic circumstance, ISIS would not have a significant impact on Afghan society nor find a concert response from the Afghans due its foreign origin but to carry more deadly attacks. Over 30 worshippers were killed and dozens more wounded in Wednesday evening’s blast inside a mosque in Afghan capital Kabul.

In a pessimistic view, ISIS will approach to recruit the criminals released from jails in line with the general amnesty declared by the Taliban soon after regaining power in August. Also poverty is the main reason where ISIS sees it as an opportunity to strengthen its rank. During winter time, when many Afghans were scrambling with food, ISIS focused on recruiting personnel but switched to deadly attacks soon at the beginning of summer.

They use poverty to persuade people

ISIS can’t use Islamic rules and regulation as the core reason for its war, but definitely use joblessness and poverty as a propaganda tool in a country where its people are facing a severe humanitarian crisis. It’s not a big decision for improvised Afghans to join ISIS in return for salaries in dollars.

“Afghanistan would never become a ISIS stronghold and we promise this to our citizens,” the senior Taliban official said.

The Afghans have suffered miserably in the last 43 years due to the war, the official assured to work for an Afghanistan to live in peace with itself, neighbors and world far away from extremist groups.

Asia

Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says

Published

on

The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.

According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.

The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.

The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.

The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.

The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.

According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.

Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House

The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.

In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.

In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.

According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.

Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.

Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.

Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.

Continue Reading

Asia

Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices

Published

on

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.

Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.

The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.

According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”

Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).

Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.

During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.

Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.

Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.

The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.

“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.

Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.

Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers

Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.

In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.

Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.

The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.

Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.

Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks

Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.

A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”

The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.

At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.

According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.

Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.

A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.

Continue Reading

Asia

South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants

Published

on

South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.

The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.

Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.

Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”

“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.

Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.

The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.

Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.

Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.

According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.

South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.

South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.

The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.

Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.

After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey