Connect with us

EUROPE

The German economy: Is Europe’s economic flagship falling apart?

Published

on

Germany’s Green Economy Minister Robert Habeck issued an unusual warning last month. If Ukraine’s gas transit agreement with Russia was not extended after it expires at the end of next year, Germany would be forced to reduce or even shut down its industrial capacity.

Also deputy chancellor, Habeck delivered the stark warning at an economic conference in eastern Germany. The venue was significant: The Alternative for Germany (AfD) seemed to be in the lead among eastern voters, and one of the main things that attracted voters to the party was the fact that the ‘German economic miracle’ had not really worked there. According to Habeck, policymakers should avoid ‘making the same mistake again’ by assuming that the economy would not be affected without measures to secure energy supplies.

Growth data: Alarm bells ring in the manufacturing sector

It is widely accepted that Germany, Europe’s number one economically, is in a difficult situation due to the war in Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, the energy crisis and ‘protectionist’ policies in the US.

For example, the German economy has technically been in recession for two quarters consecutively. According to data released today (July 24), the German Composite PMI Manufacturing Index declined for the third consecutive month, falling to 48.3 from 50.6 in June. The index entered the contraction zone below 50 for the first time since January. Manufacturing production levels fell at the fastest pace since May 2020 as demand for goods fell sharply.

The service sector also lost momentum, with growth hitting a five-month low. Across the sector, new business declined again, leading to the sharpest drop in total new business inflows in more than three years. Customer hesitancy, destocking, high inflation and rising interest rates are cited as factors contributing to the decline in demand for both goods and services.

The pace of job growth across the private sector in Germany slowed significantly in July and the overall rate of job creation was the weakest in almost two and a half years. Hiring slowed in the service sector, while payrolls in the manufacturing sector fell marginally.

The unemployment rate is likely to continue to rise as manufacturing employment declined and the service sector reduced hiring. Moreover, the service sector experienced an increase in input and output prices in July, postponing hopes for a rapid slowdown in inflation until next spring. The manufacturing sector, on the other hand, saw a moderation in the increase in input costs.

Industry lobby pessimistic

It is clear that German industrialists are making the most noise in the debate on ‘deindustrialization’ in Germany.

The Federation of German Industries (BDI), for example, says that not only large companies but also SMEs are planning to move some of their operations outside Germany.

“Many businesses headquartered in Germany are doing well globally, but they are struggling with operations at home,” BDI President Siegfried Russwurm told CNBC, citing “bureaucracy and slow management” as additional pressures companies face in the current climate. Russwurm said that the German economy will also be flat in 2023, with his country ‘lagging behind’ if global GDP grows by 2.3 percent.

Automotive sector shrinks

Things are not going well in the automotive sector, perhaps Germany’s most important industry.

The sector has shrunk significantly compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. According to data cited by Handelsblatt, Volkswagen, Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz alone produced half a million fewer passenger cars on their continent between January and May 2023 compared to the same period in 2019. This corresponds to a decline of almost 20 percent.

COVID-19 lockdowns and a shortage of semiconductors and wiring harnesses had slowed car production between 2020 and 2022. At that time, demand exceeded supply, and manufacturers were able to charge high prices and compensate for production losses with the help of short-term pandemic allowances.

After the pandemic, supply chains were now considered to be largely intact. The industry therefore expected a strong rebound in production for 2023. However, the latest data suggests that this expectation was too optimistic.

Chinese competition throws Germans off balance

The rapid entry of China, the new player in the automotive sector, into the European market is also worrying Germany. Last October, a deal made by the German car rental company Sixt worried the Germans: Sixt signed a deal not with a European or German company, but with the Chinese carmaker BYD to buy 100,000 electric cars in the coming years.

News that Chinese carmakers such as BYD and NIO have started selling their vehicles in European markets has raised questions about the future of German manufacturers. Last May, for example, Germany’s largest tabloid, BILD, headlined “Chinese cars flood Europe,” referring to the rapidly growing market shares of the new suppliers.

There are no German companies among the top 10 companies dominating the electric car market in China. The share of German companies in the world’s largest automotive market is still 19 percent, but when it comes to electric vehicles, it is around 5 percent.

In fact, a survey conducted by the Association of German Engineers (VDI) and published on May 25 revealed that 55% of Germans do not think that “the best cars will still come out of Germany in 10 or 15 years”.

Only 12% said they thought this was definitely the case, while 33% said they believed it was likely but not certain.

The gap between inward and outward investment is widening

A decline in manufacturing, slowing consumer spending and weak export growth, combined with high inflation and rising borrowing costs, have caused the German economy to shrink in the last two quarters.

Added to this are investment problems. Citing OECD data, the Cologne-based German Economic Institute said the gap between German companies’ outward investment and inward business investment in 2022 will be the largest on record.

Germany’s ability to attract business investment fell sharply last year. More than 135 billion euros in foreign direct investment (FDI) went abroad, while only 10.5 billion euros came into the country.

The institute’s report says that 70 percent of German companies’ outward investments went to other European countries, making “the collapse of investment in European neighbors particularly worrying. According to the Institute, many of Germany’s problems are related to its own internal failures: high corporate taxes, excessive bureaucracy and poor infrastructure. We note for the moment that these findings are perfectly in line with the criticisms coming from Europe’s ‘libertarian’ right-wing movements.

US ‘declaration of war’

The warnings of a politician belonging to the Greens, one of the most prominent defenders of American interests in Germany, may seem strange, but Habeck’s warnings did not stop with his words at the beginning of this article.

“[Americans] want to own semiconductors, they want the solar industry, they want the hydrogen industry, they want electrolyzers,” he told a conference in June, and said of the government subsidies the Biden administration has introduced under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), “It’s like a declaration of war.”

If the Financial Times (FT) is to be believed, calls for retaliation against the US are growing in Germany. A senior German official told the FT, “People came to the WTO. So I said: we are in the middle of a war. Now is not the time to fight with our biggest ally,” he told the FT.

‘Deindustrialization’ or ‘recalibration’?

When it comes to ‘green transformation’ and ‘independence from China and Russia’, it is inevitable that the Euro-Atlantic world, led by the US, will make a political move.

There is a major restructuring going hand in hand with monopolization: The unity of state-economy is being reinforced and the lines between capital and the state are blurring.

German Green Minister Habeck made this point very clearly at the BDI Industry Day conference: “In my view, Germany is an attractive location for both new and existing companies. Of course, the materials industries are under pressure as a result of high energy prices, but there are political decisions to be made.”

At this point in the world capitalist system, we are once again entering a period of intensified ‘political economy’. Statements by US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde have signaled that a global economic policy dependent on ‘geopolitical’ goals is on the horizon.

Germany is part of this world and the implementer of a series of political decisions ranging from ‘green transformation’ to ‘de-risking’. Indeed, initial anger at the US IRA has given way to ‘keeping up’. The EU, Japan and South Korea have introduced subsidies for the technology and clean energy sectors to attract new investment or prevent more companies from moving to the US. “If we don’t keep up, they will have [key sectors] and we won’t,” Habeck said. That’s the bitter truth,” Habeck said, suggesting that even an acceptance is accompanied by ambition. Both German monopolies and foreign companies with manufacturing investments in Germany are warning Berlin and Brussels to create an alternative to the IRA. The new stage of monopoly-state integration does not necessarily entail ‘deindustrialization’: ‘traditional’ industries are declining, while ‘new-green’ industries are growing with state subsidies. Gunter Erfurt, CEO of Meyer Burger, a Swiss solar technology company with three factories in eastern Germany, praised the IRA and its subsidies for clean technology companies, saying: “Unlike us Europeans, Americans have realized that solar technology is not just a commodity that you can buy from a random supplier at the best price, it risks becoming a plaything of geopolitics. Everyone needs it for the energy transition.”

Indeed, in May, Swedish battery maker Northvolt committed to building its next factory in Germany after Berlin pledged to pour hundreds of millions of euros into the project. The US and the IRA almost won this race. But Berlin managed to hold on to the Swedish giant with the Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework (TCTF), which turned out to be not so temporary after all. The TCTF framework is now also being used to help solar companies. At the end of June, Habeck’s ministry asked for declarations of intent for a new subsidy program for companies planning to manufacture solar modules or components or process the critical raw materials needed to make them.

Also in May, the German government announced plans to set aside about 4 billion euros ($4.4 billion) each year to subsidize electricity prices for energy-intensive industries in an effort to protect some businesses from high costs. Habeck says they want to keep industry in Germany, and the electricity subsidies are aimed at that.

German companies can profit from ‘green transformation’

German central bank governor Joachim Nagel also said on April 13 that Germany’s energy crisis was ‘more or less solved’ and that the country had the ‘inner strength’ to recover from the double shock of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine.

“German industry has a good capacity to deal with the situation … and I believe they will overcome it and get back to the levels we saw before the pandemic,” Nagel said.

What’s more, Europe’s ‘green tech’ exports, while still behind China, are still ahead of the US. Germany, too, appears to be on its way to catching up with the US (its global export market share of ‘low carbon technologies’ is around 12 percent, compared to around 14 percent in the US). It should also be noted that German companies entering the US market stand to gain.

We should especially note the comfort of machine builders and equipment manufacturers. New factories are being built all over the US thanks to IRA subsidies. It is very difficult to build a factory in North America without European equipment and especially German machinery.

One of the beneficiaries is ebm-papst, a manufacturer of motors and ventilation systems based in Mulfingen in southwest Germany. The IRA has boosted demand for the company’s cooling fans for electric vehicle chargers and megapack battery storage systems.

“The IRA is an opportunity for everyone,” says Mark Shiring, CEO of the Americas for ebm-papst’s Air Technology Division. His company is poised to benefit from the planned rollout of high-speed electric vehicle chargers across the US.

German financial power ready for incentives

Germany and Europe are lagging behind the United States in this regard, but the expansion of subsidy schemes and the loosening of bureaucracy are likely, especially in a country as financially strong and export-dependent as Germany. US chip giant Intel has announced plans to invest 17 billion euros in two new factories in the eastern German city of Magdeburg. The German government had promised to subsidize the project to the tune of €6.8 billion. Intel then asked for more, citing high energy costs. And it got what it asked for: The government agreed to increase the subsidy level to 9.9 billion euros, and Intel announced that it was increasing its investment volume from 17 billion euros to 30 billion euros.

Before the 2000s, Germany was already being called the ‘sick man of Europe’ because of low growth rates and high unemployment. It is clear that part of the clamor for ‘deindustrialization’ or ‘economic decline’ comes from the ‘left-behind’ sectors of capital. Moreover, with the war in Ukraine, the German defense sector has received a significant infusion of blood. Both arms companies and their related industries have been enjoying unprecedented share rallies since February 2022. The EU’s efforts to reorganize its economy according to the war will also accelerate the integration of some monopolies into the state and show that for them ‘deindustrialization’ is not a reality at all.

Those who can be dismissed

For example, Ingeborg Neumann, President of the German Textile Industry Association, said in his speech at the BDI event, “Energy costs, labor shortages, bureaucracy; it is no longer attractive for us to produce in Germany.” First, the share of textiles in the German economy has been declining since 1998. While the sector is still an important source of employment, it could be discarded or outsourced to other nearby countries, for example in Central and Eastern Europe. Second, the problems listed by the sector representative can somehow be solved or mitigated: Re-establishing ties with Russia; attracting migrant labor; restructuring the state to make it easier for capital; new incentives for export markets… Moreover, the fact that export-oriented manufacturers are struggling should not prevent us from seeing the bigger picture: while the German economy has struggled recently, the Dax index, the country’s 40 largest listed companies, has risen by 20% in the past year to an all-time high. The German economy is still dominated by the services sector and this divergence between services and manufacturing is expected to continue.

Chemical conglomerates like BASF are making losses and scaling back their German operations, that’s true. But the divergence itself does not necessarily mean that ‘the economy is doing badly’. For example, Maria Ferraro, Chief Financial Officer at Siemens Energy, said, “We are now seeing a revival in the market with real momentum. We have an overflowing order book,” she said. Spending on R&D is fourth in the world, behind the US, China and Japan. According to the World Patent Office, about a third of all European patents come from Germany. Much of the innovation power is embedded in large companies such as Siemens and Volkswagen and focused on well-established industries. The following sectors stand out in patent applications respectively: Transportation; Electrical machinery, equipment, energy; measurement; mechanical components; computer technology. Compared to other G7 partners, Germany is still a country where the manufacturing industry plays an important role. Bloomberg also points this out in an analysis and points out that the giant German banks still ‘dwarf’ those on Wall Street. The combined market capitalization of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank is less than a tenth of that of JPMorgan!

The German problem and the AfD

Almost 20 years ago, Germany overcame its reputation as the ‘sick man of Europe’ with an ambitious package of ‘labor market reforms’ that ushered in a period of sustained prosperity, driven by strong demand for its machinery and automobiles, especially from China. Germany exported far more than it bought. Now, the ‘divergence’ from Russia and China signals a new situation. The rise of the AfD can also be explained by the difficulty of ‘exporting Germany’ in adapting to the new world. From the creation of new economic zones within the EU to the ‘controlled dismantling’ of the EU, there are a number of policy proposals to overcome the difficulties on the establishment front. SMEs, the Mittelstand, an important component of the German economy, are the biggest bearers of the cry of ‘deindustrialization’. We will analyze the AfD phenomenon from this perspective in the next article.

EUROPE

European Investment Bank to lend to defence projects

Published

on

The EU’s lending arm, the European Investment Bank (EIB), announced on Wednesday (8 May) that it was changing its long-standing policy of not investing in military products by lifting restrictions on dual-use investments.

In a statement, the EIB’s board of directors said it had approved “the updated definition of dual-use goods and infrastructure eligible for financing by the EIB Group”, removing the minimum threshold of expected revenues from civilian applications or the share of civilian users in a defence-related investment.

Previously, the dual-use lending criteria limited the Bank’s investment in defence-related projects to civilian applications that denied their military use.

EU finance ministers, who act as the EIB’s directors, agreed to “facilitate financing” by paving the way for “private intermediary financing” for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) active in security and defence.

They also added projects and infrastructure used by the military or police that also serve civilian needs to the bank’s list of “appropriate targeted investments”.

The move will expand the bank’s ability to invest in products and technologies used only by the armed forces, including cybersecurity, radar, satellite technology, infrastructure and equipment, as long as they “do not pose a lethal risk”.

“The changes are expected to accelerate investment and improve access to EIB Group financing for the European security and defence sector,” the EIB said in a statement.

The EIB had already committed EUR 6 billion under the Strategic European Security Initiative (SESI) and the European Investment Fund’s (EIF) Defence Capital Facility.

While the European defence industry and defence ministries have long been asking the EIB to increase its contribution to the EU’s growing defence effort, this request was only put on the table of finance ministers in February, and EIB President Nadia Calviño launched a two-month consultation process with the European Commission.

According to several sources with knowledge of the negotiations, one of the key conditions for the EIB to move beyond its traditional lending mandate is its ability to maintain its environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings as well as its top credit rating.

In particular, the triple-A core credit rating allows the lender to obtain very favourable borrowing conditions on the market. As Euractiv has previously reported, this is a key priority for the bank’s shareholders (i.e. the bloc’s 27 member states), which neither the bank nor national governments want to jeopardise.

Last week, US credit rating giant Moody’s became the first rating agency to confirm that not only the EIB’s ESG score but also its overall credit rating would be put under review if significant changes were made to the dual-use policy.

Continue Reading

EUROPE

Denmark and Sweden agree on joint Baltic defence cooperation

Published

on

The Danish and Swedish Defence Ministers, Troels Lund Poulsen and Pål Jonson, signed a Memorandum of Understanding on Tuesday in which the two countries agreed to strengthen their defence cooperation, including joint procurement of military equipment and cooperation in the Baltic Sea region.

The closer defence cooperation was agreed in a memorandum of understanding during an official visit to Stockholm on Tuesday.

The document states that the cooperation agreement ‘will remain within the framework of NATO, the EU and the Nordic Defence Cooperation, NORDEFCO, and will be supported by regular bilateral consultations’.

Under the agreement, Copenhagen and Stockholm will ‘explore’ the joint procurement of military vehicles used by both armies, such as CV90 infantry fighting vehicles.

Specifically, Denmark and Sweden will coordinate the purchase of equipment whenever possible,’ the Danish Ministry of Defence said in a press release. This cooperation could possibly include the purchase of CV90 infantry fighting vehicles (IKK), which are used by both Sweden and Denmark,’ the Danish Ministry of Defence said in a press release.

Sweden and Denmark have agreed to donate CV90 vehicles to Ukraine in 2023, while both armies need to replenish their own stocks.

Both Sweden and Denmark have donated Stridsfordon 90 (CV 90) vehicles to Ukraine, and we share the view that continued support for Ukraine is vital,” the Swedish defence minister said.

According to the Danish Defence Minister, this cooperation became even more natural when Sweden joined NATO and both countries pledged to work together for the security of the Baltic region.

For example, Sweden and Denmark will expand air policing cooperation in the Baltic Sea region, based on agreements on access to each other’s airspace and bases for the benefit of NATO allies, including the security of the Danish island of Bornholm and the strategic Swedish island of Gotland.

In addition, as Sweden is currently considering sending a battalion to Latvia, the document proposes that both countries contribute a battalion or battle group to the Canadian-led presence in Ādaži, Latvia, on a rotational basis after the Swedish parliament votes on the issue.

“In this way, Denmark and Sweden will be able to work together on a rotational basis, starting from Denmark’s Camp Valdemar in Ādaži,” the Danish Ministry of Defence said in a press release.

Continue Reading

EUROPE

Pro-Palestine protests spread to European campuses: police attacked in Amsterdam and Berlin

Published

on

Students across the UK, including in Cambridge and Oxford, have launched protests in solidarity with the Palestinian people and their fellow students around the world.

Similar to protests in the US, Canada and France, camps have been set up on campuses calling for a boycott of Israel and the withdrawal of investment from the country.

Students have set up camps at London University’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) and the universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Liverpool and Edinburgh.

In a joint statement, the organisers of Oxford Action for Palestine and Cambridge for Palestine said: ‘Over 100 universities around the world have decided to take bold and urgent action on behalf of Palestine. As members of these organisations, we reject our universities’ complicity in Israel’s war crimes against the Palestinian people and refuse to stand by while Israel legitimises its campaign of mass murder, starvation and displacement.

Protesters in Oxford and Cambridge arrived on Monday morning with supplies, sleeping bags and banners. The banners read ‘No more universities in Gaza’ and ‘Stop the genocide’.

A large banner reading ‘Welcome to the People’s University for Palestine’ was hung outside the camp outside Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford.

Oxford lecturers support protests

They also demanded that Oxford and Cambridge universities divest from all companies linked to Israeli genocide and occupation, support the rebuilding of Gaza’s education system, end institutional links with Israeli universities, and protect the safety of students and staff involved in pro-Palestinian actions.

Over 170 Oxford faculty and staff signed a letter in support of the camp and its aims.

Set up on King’s Parade in central Cambridge, the camp’s activities included ‘de-escalation’ training for protesters, a rally and a dinner funded by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. The Guardian reports that a crowdfunding campaign has raised nearly £6,000 for vital supplies needed to make the camp long lasting, permanent and effective.

Other universities involved so far include University College London, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield, Leeds, Warwick, Swansea, Goldsmiths and Bristol in the UK, as well as Sciences Po in France, Trinity College Dublin in Ireland, the University of Lausanne in Switzerland and the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.

Police disperse camp in Berlin

On Tuesday, German police broke up a protest by hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists who had occupied the courtyard of Berlin’s Free University earlier in the day.

The demonstrators had set up around 20 tents and formed a human chain around them.

Police used loudspeakers to call on students to leave the campus.Police were also seen carrying some students away, and there were scuffles between police and demonstrators.

Police used pepper spray against some of the protesters. The school administration said in a statement that the protesters refused to engage in dialogue and that the police were called to evacuate the campus.

125 arrested in Amsterdam

On Tuesday, Dutch police arrested around 125 activists while breaking up a similar pro-Palestinian encampment at the University of Amsterdam.

In a statement on social media platform X, Amsterdam police claimed their actions were ‘necessary to maintain order’ after the protests turned violent.

Footage aired by national broadcaster NOS showed police using a mechanical digger to break down barricades and police with batons and shields moving in, beating some protesters and uprooting tents. According to NOS, the protesters had erected barricades made of wooden pallets and bicycles.

Demonstrators had occupied a small island at the university on Monday, calling for a break in academic relations with Israel over the war in Gaza.

Police ended the protest in Amsterdam early Tuesday afternoon by cordoning off the area with metal fences.

A statement from the school said police had ended the demonstration on the Roeterseiland campus on Tuesday evening ‘due to public order and security concerns’.

The war between Israel and Hamas is having a huge impact on students and staff. We share the anger and confusion about the war and understand that there are protests about it. We stress that dialogue on this issue within the university is the only solution,’ the statement said.

Protests also held in Finland and Denmark

In Finland, dozens of protesters from the solidarity group Students for Palestine camped outside the main building of the University of Helsinki and said they would remain there until Finland’s largest academic institution severed academic ties with Israeli universities.

In Denmark, students set up a pro-Palestinian camp at the University of Copenhagen, pitching some 45 tents outside the campus of the Faculty of Social Sciences.

The university said students were allowed to protest, but urged them to respect campus rules.

The statement argued that the administration ‘cannot and should not express opinions on behalf of university staff and students on political issues, including the ongoing conflict in Israel and the Palestinian territories’.

Demonstrations in Bologna, Rome and Naples

In Italy, students at the University of Bologna, one of the oldest universities in the world, set up a tent camp over the weekend to demand an end to the war in Gaza, as Israel prepared for an offensive in Rafah.

Student groups organised similar, largely peaceful protests in Rome and Naples.

More than a dozen tents were set up in a square named after a university student who fought against fascist rule during the Second World War. Some of the tents were decorated with Palestinian flags and banners reading ‘Student Intifada’.

Protest at Macron’s university

Student groups in Paris have called for a rally in solidarity with the Palestinians on Tuesday.

On Friday, French police ‘peacefully’ removed dozens of students who had gathered in support of the Palestinians at the Paris Institute of Political Studies, known as Sciences Po.

On Tuesday, students from the prestigious institute, whose alumni include French Prime Minister Gabriel Attal and President Emmanuel Macron, were seen entering the campus freely to take exams as police waited at the entrances.

Protests were also held at several other universities in France last week, including in Lille and Lyon. Macron’s office said police had been asked to remove students from 23 areas on French campuses.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey