Asia
The truth on Haqqani assassination; Sacrificed in the game of throne

Khalil al-Rahman Haqqani, the Taliban Minister of Refugees and a senior member of the Haqqani network, was killed in a suicide attack in the Ministry’s building in Afghanistan’s capital city, Kabul. He was the only armed Taliban minister who attended all official and unofficial meetings with a gun. Some senior officials of the former government have described the killing of Haqqani in a suicide attack as “martyrdom”, but a large number of citizens criticized these officials for expressing sympathy on his death. The citizens said that a large number of innocent Afghans were killed by the Haqqani network suicide squad which was under observation of the Khalil Haqqani in the past 20 years before they take power in 2021. They said that the families of the victims were a “little consoled” by the death of Haqqani.
At the same time, the Taliban’s Ministry of Information and Culture ordered media operating inside the country to use the word “martyrdom” in their reports instead of death. This order caused a number of media outlets to edit their already published news. A number of citizens of the country have attributed the killing Khalil Haqqani to the differences between Hibatullah Akhundzada the supreme leader of the Taliban and Sirajuddin Haqqani, the interior minister and head of Haqqani Network, referring to the “Amir and Khalifa” game of thrones.
In the past 20 years, the Haqqani network has taken responsibility for numerous suicide attacks in Kabul and some other provinces, as a result of which hundreds of people, including women and children, have been killed and injured.
After taking control of Afghanistan, this network has proudly praised its suicide fighters many times and given land and government facilities to their families. In the latest case, a senior member of this network and the uncle of Sirajuddin Haqqani, known as the “head of suicide bombers”, was killed in a suicide attack.
Khalil Haqqani was killed in a suicide attack at his ministry’s headquarters and the attack took place while he was constantly armed at the most official meetings and it was said that he did not trust his bodyguards either. Hours after the attack, the Taliban group published a photo attributed to the suicide bomber on social media and said that the attacker was holding a metal rod and had told the security guards that his hand had undergone surgery. He then detonated his explosive materials during the official meeting.
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that Khalil Haqqani was killed in a “barbaric” ISIS attack. He called Haqqani’s death a “big loss” for the Taliban and emphasized that this event cannot weaken the strength of the Taliban government. Sirajuddin Haqqani and a number of other members of the Taliban leadership praised him. Later, ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack.
It came as shock that Khalil Haqqnai killed by a suicide bomber
Apparently, it was not expected that someone like Khalil al-Rahman Haqqani, a famous and senior member of the Haqqani network, would become a victim of a suicide attack. Perhaps, after Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban’s interior minister, he was the second prominent figure in the Haqqani network. Khalil Haqqani has played an effective and unique role in the provision of Haqqani’s financial resources.
It is said that he provided financial aid to the Haqqani network through Pakistan and some countries in the south of the Persian Gulf. Now that he has been removed from the field, the Haqqanis may be in some trouble. The US had set a bounty of five million dollars for revealing his whereabouts and he was also in the blacklist of the United Nations.
While it is still early, it is also difficult to talk about the visible and hidden sides of the Haqqani assassination despite the Daesh group having already claimed responsibility for this. Considering the way the Taliban have been ruling for more than three years, the internal differences of their regime, the claim of enmity of this group with ISIS, etc., the following points can be raised:
First:
The Haqqanis are known as the main planners and agents of suicide attacks in Afghanistan. Siraj Haqqani has frequently appreciated and consoled the survivors of the suicide bombers and distributed a huge amount of money to them. His consolation went beyond this and ordered that a “memorial minaret” be built in the Garde Siri district of Paktia province for the person who blew himself up in front of the US soldiers, something that is confusing to understand.
Just a few days ago, he went to Gilan district of Ghazni and during his speech, he once again praised the suicide bombers and called the freedom of Afghanistan the result of their sacrifice. Meanwhile, the rest of the important figures of the Taliban apparently do not speak widely about the suicide bombers. Now that one of the famous Haqqanis has been the victim of a suicide attack, it is not known whether Siraj Haqqani will continue to spread the culture of suicide.
Second:
Considering the status and credibility that Khalil Haqqani had in the Taliban regime and the Haqqani network, his loss is a big psychological blow to the Haqqanis, in a situation where (according to some claims) they are trying to stand against Mullah Hebatullah, the leader of the Taliban. Since the Taliban came back to power, no one from the Haqqani family had been killed like Khalil Haqqani. Mullah Hebatullah’’ block has lost a key member – Dawood Mozmal, the former governor of Balkh.
Khalil Haqqani showed himself to be so influential that he even carried weapons during official meetings with foreign officials (both Western and non-Western) and his bodyguards protected him with unique looks. Something that maybe even Hebatullah will not do. Therefore, it is difficult and time-consuming to fill Khalil Haqqani’s vacancy in the Haqqani network.
Third:
When we think about the perpetrator of the attack, several options come to mind: ISIS which has already claimed responsibility, but we should not forget about internal disputes, family quarrels, foreign intervention, opposition forces, etc. The prevailing suspicion is based on the involvement of ISIS; A group that is skilled in suicide and perhaps learned from the Taliban. Daoud Muzamel was also assassinated by ISIS. The Taliban also attributed the attack to ISIS, but this group has not claimed responsibility so far.
Some consider the internal conflicts of the Taliban to be the cause of terror, and in this context, Sirajuddin Haqqani’s statements against Hebatullah are cited. It is also mentioned in the references of western newspapers and institutions that “Sirajuddin and Hebatuallah” seem to be at odds with each other. Of course, in recent days, the Sirajuddin criticized Hebatullah more than ever before.
Since the Haqqani network is a complex and secretive organization, it is possible that those inside this organization may have provided a platform for assassination. The role of foreign intelligence also comes to mind, but it does not seem justified. It cannot be attributed to the opposing forces of the Taliban either because while they don’t have the ability, they also avoid doing it.
Fourth:
The Taliban’s claim about providing national security in Afghanistan has once again turned into a hoax. The Taliban have repeatedly claimed that the war is over, that national security is ensured, and that the migrants should return to Afghanistan and continue their lives. Of course, by making this claim, they have also received concessions from the world. Now, the assassination of a Taliban minister, even with high security arrangements, revealed that this group is not even able to provide security for someone who was carrying an American M4 weapon in an official meeting with foreign women. Of course, this is not the first time that the Taliban’s claims are wrong.
Fifth:
The assassination series is likely to continue. It is not known whether the next victim is from the Haqqani bloc or Hebatullah. Whatever and whoever it is, the result is the deepening of the Taliban’s internal discord and the world’s disbelief in what this group calls the provision of national security.
Of course, repression and suffocation will intensify more than in the past, because they suspect more citizens. It is possible that the Taliban officials will end their demonstration meetings with the people and refrain from traveling to the provinces. Anyway, the truth of Haqqani’s assassination and its consequences will be revealed more in the following weeks and months.
Asia
OECD forecasts slower Chinese economic growth due to trade war

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) announced that the Chinese economy will grow by 4.3% next year, lowering its previous forecast by 0.1 percentage points in light of ongoing global trade conflicts.
The Paris-based group stated that “significant trade barriers” and “diminished confidence and increased policy uncertainty” are exerting downward pressure on global economic growth rates this year and next. It noted that the global slowdown trend will be most pronounced in China, Canada, Mexico, and the US.
The 38-member OECD’s outlook report this week follows US President Donald Trump’s imposition of double-digit tariff increases on imports from many countries this year. Most of the targeted countries are in Asia, with the largest increases aimed at China.
The OECD’s outlook report stated that China’s exports “will be constrained by newly implemented tariffs,” while imports will fall as production becomes increasingly localized. The report said, “Tariffs will disproportionately affect private companies, including foreign firms that are major exporters.” The US absorbed 13.5% of China’s direct merchandise exports last year.
The OECD added that China’s consumption is negatively impacted by “still-high precautionary savings due to the trauma created by the pandemic and the correction in the real estate sector,” despite support from this year’s durable goods trade-in program.
The report noted that China’s infrastructure investment is “stable,” while consumer price inflation is “low” and producer prices are trending downwards. The OECD did not change its economic growth forecast for China for this year, keeping it at 4.7%. Authorities in Beijing are targeting economic growth of “around 5%.”
Trump’s highest tariff increases, including those targeting China, have been suspended pending the conclusion of US negotiations with individual countries. However, other tariff increases, which the US leader said were implemented to address unfairness in America’s foreign trade balance, have already taken effect.
The OECD report warned that further “fragmentation” of trade, including new tariff increases and retaliatory measures, could exacerbate the growth slowdown and disrupt cross-border supply chains in large parts of the world.
OECD Secretary-General Mathias Cormann said, “The global economy has entered a more uncertain path from a period of resilient growth and falling inflation.” Inflation is expected to persist, especially where “trade costs are significantly high” or labor markets are tight.
The report projects the US economy will grow by 1.6% this year and 1.5% next year. These figures are below the 2.4% forecast for this year made in December and the 2.1% projection for 2026. According to OECD estimates, the global economy will grow by 2.9% this year and next. This is below the 3.3% forecast for both years made in December.
Song Seng Wun, an economic advisor at Singapore-based financial services company CGS, said, “On the surface, the OECD’s forecast is a reasonable one that takes into account the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory measures that could affect business confidence. This situation can affect your employment and investment decisions.”
The OECD projected that India will be the only major economy in the G20 group to record growth above 6% this year and next. Indonesia, one of the G20’s top-performing countries, is expected to grow by 4.7% this year and 4.8% next year.
Asia
Lee Jae-myung inaugurated as South Korea’s new president, vows unity and economic revival

South Korea’s new President Lee Jae-myung pledged to “build a new country of hope” as he was sworn into office at the National Assembly on Wednesday, following his victory in the elections.
Lee, from the Democratic Party (DP), addressed the South Korean people in his inaugural speech in Seoul, saying, “Regardless of whom you supported in this election, I will be a president who embraces everyone and serves all citizens.”
Before the ceremony, Lee Jae-myung visited the Seoul National Cemetery to pay tribute to Korean soldiers who died in wars.
Lee, who officially began his five-year term, acknowledged that Asia’s fourth-largest economy faces an “intertwined network of crises in diplomacy, national security, and democracy.”
He promised to fundamentally change the outdated economic development model, which he blamed for fueling inequality and hindering growth. He said he would address the urgent economic problems facing the country by focusing on cost-of-living issues affecting middle- and low-income families and the struggles of small business owners.
He emphasized that they would revive growth by adopting a pragmatic and market-oriented approach to the economy and strengthen advanced technologies.
South Korea’s economy is under pressure due to Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies and intense competition from Chinese exporters. It is also approaching the July deadline set by the White House for negotiations on import tariffs, which Washington cites as the cause of the large trade imbalance between the two countries.
Message of dialogue with North Korea
In foreign policy, Lee Jae-myung reiterated his pre-election promise to communicate with North Korea, saying, “We will keep communication channels open with the North and achieve peace on the Korean peninsula through dialogue and cooperation.”
“It is better to win without fighting than to win through conflict, and the most reliable security is peace that makes war unnecessary,” he added. However, he also pledged to respond to possible “nuclear and military provocations.”
Lee reaffirmed South Korea’s commitment to its alliance with the US, stating they would enhance trilateral cooperation involving Japan and pursue a practical and national interest-based approach in relations with neighboring countries. Lee described his conservative predecessor’s foreign policy towards China and Russia as “unnecessarily hostile.”
White House concerned
Lee is expected to pursue “pragmatic diplomacy” with Beijing while negotiating an agreement on tariffs with the US president, at a time of intensified competition between the US and China.
US Senator Marco Rubio congratulated Lee on his election victory and said the two countries “share an unwavering commitment to an alliance based on a mutual defense treaty, shared values, and deep economic ties.” He also stated that the two countries are “modernizing the alliance to meet the demands of today’s strategic environment and address new economic challenges.”
The White House stated that Lee’s election was “free and fair” but that the US is concerned about and opposes China’s interference and influence in democracies worldwide.
Early election
The country is navigating a prolonged political crisis triggered in December by then-President Yoon Suk Yeol’s brief declaration of martial law. An early election was called after Yoon was impeached by a court decision.
The National Election Commission announced this morning, following its meeting, that Lee won yesterday’s presidential election. According to official results, Lee won 49.42% of the votes, while Kim Moon-soo, the candidate of the ruling People Power Party (PPP), received 41.15%. Voter turnout reached 79.4%, the highest level in 20 years.
Lee’s victory has shifted both the presidency and control of the National Assembly from conservatives to liberal parties after several years of divided government.
The Bank of Korea last week lowered its growth forecast for this year from 1.5% to 0.8%, following a slight contraction in the economy in the first quarter due to a sharp slowdown in exports. South Korea’s benchmark Kospi stock index rose over 2.4% in morning trading. Investors anticipate that Lee will introduce governance reforms to increase the power of minority shareholders and reduce the influence of families controlling the country’s largest industrial groups.
From mayor to president
Lee, a 61-year-old former human rights lawyer, described Tuesday’s election as a “judgment day” against Yoon’s martial law and the People Power Party’s failure to stop this unfortunate move.
Lee began his political career in 2010 when he was elected Mayor of Seongnam, where he gained attention for his social welfare projects. He served as Governor of Gyeonggi Province from 2018 to 2021 and was noted for his effective measures against the COVID-19 pandemic. He narrowly lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon Suk Yeol.
In 2024, he survived an assassination attempt and, in the same year, played an active role in the resistance against Yoon’s declaration of martial law.
Lee has also faced past accusations of making false statements during his election campaign, and legal proceedings on this matter are ongoing. However, according to the South Korean constitution, a sitting president cannot be prosecuted, so the cases have been postponed.
Lee Jae-myung’s presidency could herald significant changes for South Korea in both domestic and foreign policy.
Asia
China accuses US of severely violating trade truce

China has accused the US of “severely violating” the trade truce and vowed to take strong measures to protect its interests as tensions between the two powers reignite.
In early May, China and the US reached an agreement during talks in Geneva to temporarily reduce mutual tariffs, which had climbed as high as 145%.
US officials have grown increasingly concerned about the slowdown in China’s rare earth exports since the May 12 agreement, while President Donald Trump claimed on Friday that China had “completely violated” the deal.
However, on Monday, China’s Ministry of Commerce stated that Washington had implemented “a series of discriminatory and restrictive measures” in recent weeks. These actions, according to the ministry, undermined the Geneva consensus and harmed “China’s legitimate rights and interests.”
The ministry declared, “If the US insists on its own path and continues to harm China’s interests, China will continue to take strong and decisive measures to protect its legitimate rights.”
Among the US measures cited in the statement are warnings against the global use of Huawei chips, the suspension of chip design software sales to Chinese firms, and the cancellation of visas for Chinese students.
US officials had anticipated that the agreement reached on May 12 would lead China to lift its export restrictions on rare earth elements, which were announced in early April. However, China did not alter its export regime and continued to slow shipments to the US.
These critical minerals are extensively used in American automotive, electronics, and defense supply chains. The slowdown in exports to the US elevates the threat of work stoppages within the US manufacturing sector.
China’s Ministry of Commerce asserted, “The US has unilaterally initiated new trade frictions.” The ministry further added, “Instead of questioning its own actions, it accused China of violating the consensus.”
Trump informed reporters on Friday that he hoped to resolve the dispute in a phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump has yet to act on this idea, which he has mentioned several times in recent months.
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Schiller Institute conference calls for new global paradigm amid turbulence
-
Europe2 weeks ago
US boosts military presence in Northern Europe amid Russia tensions
-
Middle East7 days ago
Lindsey Graham issues threat to Greta Thunberg and Gaza Freedom Flotilla
-
Interview2 weeks ago
Former European Parliament Türkiye Rapporteur Kati Piri spoke to Harici: EU doesn’t have a coherent strategy on Türkiye
-
Europe2 weeks ago
UK eyes Kosovo for processing asylum seekers arriving by small boats
-
Europe2 weeks ago
The bank blocked the account of ex-Chancellor Schroeder due to fears of sanctions
-
Europe2 weeks ago
‘National-conservative’ CPAC convenes in Budapest
-
Europe2 weeks ago
Greenland warns EU and US: Invest in mining or China will