America
US used pro-Israel Canary Mission website for deportation efforts, records show
The US government has reportedly used the pro-Israel Canary Mission website in its deportation activities.
It has been revealed that the US administration relied heavily on a pro-Israel website named Canary Mission to identify pro-Palestinian academics for deportation.
According to records, to support Donald Trump’s deportation initiative, the Department of Homeland Security established a “tiger team” of intelligence analysts who compiled files on approximately 100 foreign students and academics involved in pro-Palestinian activities.
Deposition records released this week in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s targeting of pro-Palestinian academics show that more than 75 of these individuals were identified by Canary Mission, a mysterious website.
The federal judge currently overseeing the case has publicly released the deposition transcripts, which contain hundreds of pages of sworn testimony from administration officials regarding the efforts to deport individuals from campuses.
Some details from the transcripts emerged in open court on Wednesday as administration officials began to be called to the witness stand.
In response to a query from POLITICO, Canary Mission claimed it has had “no contact with this administration or the previous one.”
Immigration lawyers and pro-Palestinian activists had already suspected that immigration officials were taking names of academics from the Canary Mission site and attempting to revoke their visas with very little independent investigation. However, the deposition transcripts reveal for the first time the extensive degree to which Trump officials relied on this site. Peter Hatch, a Department of Homeland Security official who testified in court on Wednesday, acknowledged the site’s importance to the Trump administration’s efforts but stated that all information taken from the site was independently verified.
Canary Mission states that its purpose is to expose “anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sentiments” on university campuses. It publishes photos and social media profiles of pro-Palestinian academics and documents their protest activities.
Critics allege that the group employs McCarthy-like tactics by labeling pro-Palestinian activists as anti-Semitic based on weak or irrelevant evidence. Canary Mission does not disclose its funders or details about who manages it.
The group stated, “We document individuals and groups that promote hatred of the US, Israel, and Jews. We investigate hate crimes across the entire political spectrum, including far-right, far-left, and anti-Israel activists.”
The released court records also reveal for the first time the deep involvement of the Trump administration, particularly Trump’s senior advisor Stephen Miller, in efforts to cancel the visas of pro-Palestinian academics studying and teaching at American universities.
John Armstrong, the acting head of the State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs, testified that he had “at least a dozen” meetings with White House officials about the student deportation campaign and that Miller participated in inter-agency conference calls on the subject “at least once a week.”
According to Armstrong, the conference calls with Miller lasted between approximately 15 minutes and an hour and included other officials from the National Security Council, the State Department, and the Department of Homeland Security.
The extent to which the White House was involved in selecting specific students remains unclear, as the White House has invoked executive privilege to conceal the details of Miller’s conversations with agency officials.
Detailed testimonies regarding the administration’s attempt to deport pro-Palestinian academics emerged in over 1,000 pages of documents and deposition transcripts released to the public this week as a lawsuit against this policy began in a Boston federal court.
US District Judge William Young is presiding over the case and will decide whether the Trump administration violated the First Amendment of the Constitution by targeting academics for their speech and political views.
The foreign academics were legally living and studying at American universities on student visas or green cards. However, the administration sought to revoke their legal status and force them to leave the country. Courts have so far intervened to prevent the immediate deportation of Khalil, Ozturk, and others.
Hatch provided new information regarding the role of external groups in targeting academics.
Called as a witness in the ongoing trial on Wednesday, Hatch confirmed that Canary Mission played a key role in intelligence work related to deportations.
Hatch said, “Most, if not almost all, of the names came from that website, but we were also getting names and tips from many different websites. We received information about the same protesters from many sources, but Canary Mission provided the most comprehensive information. The lists were coming from all directions.”
Hatch added that he believed his team was told to review the Canary Mission website and was verbally informed that it contained reports on more than 5,000 people.
The Department of Homeland Security official claimed, “This shows why we needed a tiger team. A normal unit, department, or group of analysts working within a regular organizational structure could not handle this workload.”
Hatch said that analysts assigned to the “counter-terrorism intelligence” unit, among others, were reassigned to the “tiger team.”
Hatch also emphasized that all information his analysts obtained from the Canary Mission site had to be verified before being included in official reports.
The official claimed, “Canary Mission is not part of the US government. This is not information that we would consider a reliable source. We do not work with the people who created this website. I do not know who created the website.”
In his testimony, Hatch stated that he believed “more than 75%” of the names in the reports prepared by the “tiger team” came from Canary Mission, and the others came from a group called Betar US, which uses the slogan “Jews stand up” and publishes profiles of pro-Palestinian activists on its website.
In February, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) added Betar to its list of extremist groups, alleging that the organization “openly embraces Islamophobia and harasses Muslims online and in person.”
Betar did not respond to a request for comment. However, a few days after Trump’s return to the White House in January, Betar announced in comments on X and to news organizations that it had provided a “deportation list” to Trump administration officials.
Administration officials called to give sworn testimony before the trial struggled to provide precise definitions of what type of advocacy or activism would be considered antisemitism or support for Hamas, which the US designates as a terrorist organization.
Both justifications were primary reasons for the deportation campaign and the efforts to deny visas to foreigners wishing to study or continue their education in the US.
In his testimony, Armstrong said that the slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” frequently chanted at pro-Palestinian rallies, could lead to the denial of a US visa because it calls for the destruction of Israel.
The State Department official said, “I think it could, because by definition, that means the elimination of Israel and the Israeli people.”
Armstrong added that calls for corporate divestment from Israel, an arms embargo on Israel, or an end to military aid to Israel could also be problematic, and that describing the country as an “apartheid state” would “probably” be considered anti-Israel activity.
On the other hand, Armstrong said that calling for a ceasefire in Gaza would not be considered a negative factor in a visa application.
“The President has called for a ceasefire. So no,” said Armstrong, who is scheduled to testify in court on Friday.
When asked what types of “anti-Americanisms” could lead to a visa denial under Trump’s new policy, Armstrong replied, “It would be a general condemnation: All Americans are fat and evil. It wouldn’t be saying, ‘I hate hot dogs.'”
America
Musk appointed co-director of Pentagon future warfare initiative
The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has assumed the co-directorship of a Pentagon initiative focused on the future of warfare, known as “Project Meridian”.
Musk’s new role was announced by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.
Musk, who has long expressed his conviction that wars will ultimately be fought with autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, will advise the project as co-director alongside Palmer Luckey, founder of defence start-up Anduril, and former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich.
In a memorandum issued at the Pentagon, Hegseth stated that the group would “examine the battlefields of the future” and “determine which weapons and technologies warfighters must employ to achieve dominance in these environments.”
During his “State of the Force” address at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Hegseth said:
“The best predictors of future conflict do not reside exclusively within the Pentagon. Obvious biases and risks arise when we task ourselves with both framing the questions and answering them.”
Hegseth stated that this initiative would commence immediately and that, following his address, he would convene with Musk, Luckey, and Gingrich at a secure location.
Project Meridian will have 120 days to “ruthlessly map the trajectory of wars, domains, and technologies”, a process that will culminate in the public disclosure of its findings alongside a classified annex.
Hegseth outlined an expansive mandate extending “from beneath the surface of the Earth to beyond the Moon.”
Rather than formulating new military strategies or policies, the panel will seek to identify “the domains we must seize and the capabilities we must master”, focusing on the effort to “discover, develop, and field” the weapons and systems that next-generation American troops may require.
The group is expected to submit a report containing recommendations to him by the end of January.
In 2024, Musk remarked: “Future wars will be entirely about drones and hypersonic missiles.” This was merely one of several similar statements he has made in recent years.
For Musk, whose oversight role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ended in turmoil and escalated into a dispute with President Donald Trump over Trump’s spending bill, this appointment marks his formal return to government in an official capacity.
Musk and Trump ultimately reconciled, and Musk attended a meeting on artificial intelligence safety at the White House this week alongside other technology leaders.
Meridian forms part of a broader push announced by Hegseth to restructure the military around autonomous warfare and rapidly advancing technologies.
Hegseth announced the establishment of the Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), a new four-star combatant command endowed with what he termed “service-like authorities” to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force.
The Department of War will also begin phasing in new occupational frameworks across all military branches to establish specialised career tracks for what Hegseth described as “the next generation of autonomous warfighters.”
“We should have conceived an Autonomous Warfare Command a decade ago,” Hegseth said, explaining that Meridian aims to gaze far enough ahead to enable the military to anticipate the next technological shift rather than lag behind.
America
Pentagon breach exposes personal records of three million people
A cyberattack targeting the US Department of War’s personnel database has resulted in the leak of personal information belonging to approximately 3 million people.
Speaking to ABC News, a Pentagon official stated that the system accessed by unauthorised individuals contained the records of 2,760,000 living persons and 294,000 deceased individuals.
The Military Times portal, which first broke the news, had reported the number of affected individuals as approximately 4 million based on two sources. The Pentagon official subsequently conveyed different figures to ABC News.
The leak encompasses Social Security numbers and duty information belonging to military personnel and civilian employees. According to an official notification examined by Military Times, the compromised records may also include names, dates of birth, contact information, sex, race, and military occupational specialties.
The unauthorised access to the information system of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) lasted for approximately nine months, between October 2025 and 16 July 2026.
ABC News reported that the access in question was obtained by a small number of third-party users. The vulnerability was closed after it was identified.
The DMDC is considered one of the Pentagon’s primary personnel records centres. More than 60 million records belonging to active-duty personnel, reservists, civilian staff, contractors, retirees, veterans, and military family members are stored at the centre.
The Pentagon has not detected any evidence that the leaked data has been misused. Military Times reported that affected individuals were offered identity restoration and credit history monitoring services.
A similar data breach previously occurred on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) recruitment website, FBIJobs.gov. According to information obtained by ABC News from internal communications and sources, the FBI is considering the possibility that data belonging to its entire staff may have been stolen.
The New York Times (NYT) examined a portion of the stolen FBI records. Home addresses, telephone numbers, official email addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, hiring dates, and emergency contact details for relatives were identified within these documents.
The database also contained unit designations, duty roles, and information regarding the supervisors of personnel. Some records revealed assignments within counterintelligence and counternarcotics units, as well as departments examining threats originating from Russia, China, and Iran.
Ciaran Martin, the former head of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, noted that this type of breach could directly affect the FBI’s operational capabilities.
The hacker group known as ShinyHunters had announced that it had seized medical data and security clearance records alongside files belonging to tens of thousands of active and former FBI employees.
Experts evaluating the matter for the NYT warned that this information could be used to track agents, threaten their families, or compile dossiers by foreign intelligence services.
The ShinyHunters group initially threatened to release the data unless the bureau withdrew an advisory it had published concerning the group’s attack methods.
The group later asserted that it had never intended to leak the information and characterised its action as an advertising campaign.
In a report published in May, Reuters noted that the personal data of US military personnel had been used in surveillance and attack preparations.
According to the agency, Washington’s adversaries gained the ability to pinpoint areas where troops were concentrated by exploiting commercially available location data. US lawmakers at the time criticised the Pentagon for failing to adequately protect the personal data of military personnel.
America
Canada diversifies oil and gas exports away from US
US President Donald Trump’s trade policy and the Washington administration’s push to increase Venezuelan oil imports are prompting Canada to diversify its energy exports.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, recent developments are accelerating Canada’s development of new oil and natural gas projects.
Steps taken by the Ottawa administration, which aspires to become an energy superpower, are seen as potentially strengthening the country’s position in global markets.
In Canada, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer and fifth-largest natural gas producer, the energy sector accounts for approximately one-fifth of total exports.
Almost all of the country’s natural gas exports and approximately 90% of its oil exports go to the US.
The newspaper writes that the trade war with Washington and the atmosphere of confrontation entered into with Iran have heightened Canada’s desire to turn to alternative markets outside the US.
Officials plan to increase shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European and Asian markets.
Accelerating infrastructure investments in line with this target, Canada is also shortening approval processes. The government is prioritising the construction of an oil pipeline extending specifically to the west coast.
According to the newspaper’s estimate, if major pipeline projects are implemented, Canada’s daily oil transport capacity could rise to 6.8 million barrels by 2034.
Routes heading to the west coast will make up approximately 30% of this capacity.
The Canadian administration is simultaneously advancing LNG export projects. According to the report, these investments could allow approximately 55% of Canadian natural gas exports to be directed to markets outside the US by the early or mid-2030s.
While the government expands tax incentives for the oil and natural gas sector, the province of Alberta also plans to overhaul its royalty system.
However, the newspaper notes that implementing the new projects requires heavy investment, and the process depends on the final decisions taken by producers as well as the completion of regulatory approval processes.
The expansion of pipeline and LNG infrastructure could gradually reduce Canada’s dependence on the US market while raising its share in the global energy market.
The Canadian Prime Minister’s demand to reduce reliance on the US market had also come to the fore in July.
According to Carney’s statement, the province of Alberta submitted a plan for a pipeline spanning more than 1,000 kilometres to the west coast of British Columbia.
Targeted for completion by September 2027, the line will reach the Pacific coast by following an existing corridor through the mountainous terrain.
This shift in energy comes at a time of strained relations with the US. Donald Trump said that if Canada obtains associate member status in the European Union, he could halt trade with Europe in certain sectors and impose high tariffs.
As reported by the Associated Press, Trump characterised such a rapprochement as a “potentially hostile act”.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had proposed opening the path for Canada to become the EU’s first associate member. The terms of this associate membership status, which is not defined in EU treaties, are not yet clear and require the approval of member states to enter into force.
Canada, which does not seek full membership, aims for maximum rapprochement with the EU.
Following Trump’s return to the White House, relations between Washington and Ottawa deteriorated. The Trump administration, which repeatedly called on Canada to become the “51st state” of the US, introduced additional tariffs.
In July, the US began imposing 50% tariffs on certain Canadian-origin goods.
-
Europe4 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
