Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Berliner Zeitung: Did a Putin-Trump deal topple Assad?

Published

on

The recent ousting of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, following ten days of intense jihadist attacks, has triggered widespread speculation regarding the factors behind this rapid political collapse. Emerging analyses suggest that international political maneuvers may have played a decisive role in this unprecedented event.

Michael Maier, a journalist at the German daily Berliner Zeitung, provocatively asks: “Assad’s fall: A fiasco for Putin or collusion with Trump?” He contends that the swift jihadist takeover of Damascus represents “a clear defeat for Russian President Vladimir Putin.”

Maier asserts that if Russia was caught off guard by these developments, it marks a significant failure of Russian intelligence—on par with its missteps in 2014 during the Ukraine crisis. Citing The New York Times, Maier notes that the rebel offensive was months in the making, with meticulous planning preceding Assad’s ouster.

Maier draws parallels between Russia’s withdrawal of warships from Syria’s Tartous naval base and the chaotic American exit from Afghanistan. He highlights that the implications extend far beyond Syria:

China, reliant on the military strength of Russia and Iran to project influence in the Middle East, now faces a precarious regional situation.

Turkey and Israel emerge as key beneficiaries. Maier argues that both countries have militarily facilitated Assad’s fall and may now pursue territorial gains amidst Syria’s power vacuums.

Maier further points out the shocking ease with which rebel forces advanced to Damascus, seemingly unopposed, as the Syrian army “almost disappeared.” He notes, “Assad was in Moscow for a prolonged period before his downfall. It’s unclear if he ever returned to Syria.” The swift abandonment of previously hard-fought positions by Syrian, Russian, and Iranian forces over the past 13 years underscores the speed of this geopolitical shift.

A U.S.-Russia grand bargain?

Speculation about a possible “grand bargain” between Washington and Moscow is growing. Maier references recent comments from U.S. President Donald Trump, who suggested that America’s involvement in Syria should remain limited. However, the U.S. has simultaneously announced that 900 troops will stay in Syria to secure northeastern oil fields.

Maier posits that Russia might benefit from such a deal by redirecting its military focus to Ukraine, consolidating its territorial gains there, and achieving a more stable negotiating position. He suggests Assad’s overthrow could be part of a broader geopolitical trade-off, allowing Russia to maintain influence in Syria through military bases while opening a pathway to territorial concessions in Ukraine.

Hungary’s role

Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán has reportedly contributed to discussions surrounding this “grand bargain.” One potential outcome could involve the repatriation of Syrian refugees from Europe and Turkey, a move that would align with Orbán’s domestic and EU policies.

Maier also speculates that the agreement might curb the regional ambitions of Turkey’s Erdoğan and Israel’s Netanyahu, offering a degree of balance in the Middle East.

According to Maier, these developments could be part of a larger U.S. strategy to drive a wedge between Russia and China. He references U.S. journalist Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, where similar ideas were floated.

Regardless of the underlying motivations, Maier concludes, “Putin has some explaining to do to Chinese President Xi Jinping.”

DIPLOMACY

Trump’s tariffs boost interest in German, Japanese bonds

Published

on

With investors seeking safe havens for investment for the first time in years, US Treasury bonds face serious competition from global funds.

The yields on benchmark 10-year Treasury bonds had fallen by approximately 40 basis points this year. With US President Donald Trump’s barrage of tariffs, which are thought to increase the risk of recession, they briefly fell below 4% on Monday.

According to Bloomberg, similar rates have risen in both Europe and Japan. In Germany, the 10-year bond rose to 2.61%, reflecting expectations that bond issuance will increase as the government increases defense spending.

Meanwhile, the rate on 10-year Japanese bonds has also risen after years around zero, and is currently around 1.25% as investors prepare for tighter monetary policy.

While both are still well below US bond yields, they are at levels that make them appear more attractive than Treasury bonds for European and Japanese investors who are protected from dollar risk when buying US securities.

This may convince investors to shift to their own markets, where the policy outlook is more stable.

“The idea that the administration’s various policies could undermine foreign demand for Treasury bonds is gaining traction,” said Matthew Raskin, head of US interest rates research at Deutsche Bank.

Deutsche Bank also warned of a “confidence crisis” in the dollar, while UBS Group believes the euro would get a “shot in the arm” in its status as a global reserve currency.

On the other hand, some believe this change should be viewed with skepticism. The German government bond, Bund, looked similarly attractive in mid-2023, but an aggressive sell-off in Treasury bonds pushed 10-year US yields to 5%, eroding Europe’s yield advantage.

If tariffs revive inflation, this could push US yields higher again.

But according to Bloomberg, even the discussion of such a shift in flows shows that investors are preparing for Europe to play a bigger role in global markets as competition for capital intensifies.

This could lead to greater fragility in the US Treasury market, which has been under attack from buyers in recent years amid concerns that supply could increase.

One of the early tests will take place on Tuesday, when the US government sells $58 billion of three-year bonds, followed by the sale of 10- and 30-year bonds later this week.

Traditionally, the US budget deficit has been financed in part by a wave of capital flowing into Treasury bonds from around the world.

According to Barclays’ analysis of fund flow data, foreign ownership of US Treasury bonds accounts for about a third of the market, and the foreign sector was the largest source of US bond demand last year.

This reflected net purchases of $910 billion, about half of which were in Treasury bonds.

According to US government data, the vast majority of foreign Treasury assets are in longer maturities. Ales Koutny, international interest rates manager at Vanguard, said this means that as foreign demand decreases, it could steepen the US yield curve, meaning long-term rates will rise relative to short-term rates.

An early indication of how investors are navigating global yield shifts may emerge in a few days. The new fiscal year has just begun in Japan, and this is a period when companies there typically review their allocation strategies.

Japan is a key player in global bond markets due to the Bank of Japan’s decades-long ultra-low interest rate policy, which has pushed investors to seek yield.

Germany initiated the change in early March, announcing plans to allocate hundreds of billions of euros for defense and infrastructure. Bund yields rose as investors priced in bond issuance to cover the spending.

The European Union’s large pool of savings surplus means it is the largest foreign holder of US public debt, while also playing a large role in US corporate finance.

If European countries meaningfully increase their investments, these savings could be kept at home.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Japan seeks peace treaty with Russia despite territorial dispute

Published

on

The Japanese Foreign Ministry, in its annual Blue Book report outlining key diplomatic trends, has declared its intention to continue negotiations with Russia to sign a peace treaty and resolve the issue of the “northern territories” (Tokyo’s term for the Southern Kurils), despite the challenging relationship.

These islands include Kunashir, Shikotan, Iturup, and the Habomai archipelago.

The ministry once again described these territories as “illegally occupied” and stated that the Kuril Islands issue is the greatest concern in Japan-Russia relations.

Japan and the Soviet Union, of which the Russian Federation is the successor, have not signed a peace treaty following World War II due to the territorial dispute over the Southern Kurils.

In 2022, Russia refused to continue negotiations on this matter after Japan imposed sanctions following the start of the military intervention in Ukraine.

Moscow also withdrew from dialogue on developing joint economic activities in the Southern Kurils.

The report also emphasized that the Japanese government is pursuing a policy of gradually reducing its dependence on Russian energy resources, including oil and coal, while acting to minimize the negative impact on public life and business.

At the same time, the report stated that Japan intends to maintain its participation in the Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects.

The document stated, “The Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 oil and gas development projects are important for Japan’s energy security in terms of ensuring a stable supply in the medium and long term, and we intend to maintain our participation in them.”

In the previous version of the Blue Book, the Japanese Foreign Ministry also declared its intention to maintain its participation in the Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects.

In the Sakhalin-1 project, where Sokol-grade oil is produced, the Japanese consortium Sodeco (whose main shareholder is the Japanese government, and its members are private companies such as Japex, Itochu, Marubeni, Inpex) has a 30% stake.

The American company ExxonMobil also had the same stake but announced its withdrawal from the project in 2022.

The new managing operator of Sakhalin-1 became Sakhalinmorneftegaz-Shelf, a subsidiary of Rosneft (which previously had an 11.5% stake).

All assets of the consortium running the Sakhalin-1 project were transferred to Russian ownership.

Additionally, ONGC Videsh Ltd (India’s state oil company) has a 20% stake in Sakhalin-1, and RN-Astra (a subsidiary of Rosneft) has an 8.5% stake.

Although Japan does not import fuel under the project, Tokyo considers Sakhalin-1 important for ensuring supply diversity and stability.

The then-Japanese Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Yasutoshi Nishimura, touched on this issue in a statement in the fall of 2022.

Nishimura noted that Japan is 95% dependent on the Middle East for its oil supply.

Japan is one of the world’s largest importers of liquefied natural gas (LNG), sourcing approximately 9% of its total LNG volume purchased from Sakhalin-2.

Japanese companies Mitsui and Mitsubishi hold 12.5% and 10% stakes in Sakhalin-2, respectively, and confirmed their participation in the project in the fall of 2022.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

US-Iran talks to begin in Oman on April 12

Published

on

Negotiations between the US and Iran, the first contact since US President Donald Trump’s return to office, will begin in Oman on April 12. While the Iranian side describes these talks as “indirect,” Trump suggests the talks will take place in a direct diplomacy format. Although different expressions are used between the parties on this matter, there is a common understanding that the talks will be high-level.

Trump said in a statement after hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House last night, “We are talking directly to Iran. Perhaps a deal will be made that will be wonderful. This would be really great for Iran. We will meet at the highest level on Saturday.”

Just hours after this statement, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi confirmed the talks in a post on his social media account, but explained the format differently: “Iran and the US will meet for high-level indirect talks in Oman on Saturday. This is as much an opportunity as it is a test. The ball is now in the US’s court.”

Araqchi, Witkoff to chair the talks

According to information in the Iranian press, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi will head the Iranian delegation in the negotiations, while US Special Representative for the Middle East Steve Witkoff will head the US delegation. No official statement has yet been made regarding how many days the talks will last.

According to sources speaking to Amwaj Media, Iranian officials continue to state that the negotiations will be indirect. However, some political circles also state that the possibility of direct contact is not completely ruled out, depending on developments in Oman.

Is there a chance of success for the negotiations?

According to Trita Parsi, Vice President of the Washington-based Quincy Institute, Trump’s negotiation goal will determine the course of this process. According to Parsi, if the US side aims to completely eliminate Iran’s nuclear program with the “Libya model,” this diplomatic initiative may end before it begins. However, if Trump only aims for an audit mechanism that will prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the talks have a chance of success.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey