Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

French senators reject EU-Canada free-trade deal

Published

on

The French Senate has overwhelmingly rejected the EU-Canada trade agreement, which has been provisionally in force since 2017, due to its potential impact on French livestock, signalling further difficulties for its final ratification by the EU.

The bill on the economic and trade aspects of CETA, the trade agreement between Canada and the European Union (EU), was rejected by 255 votes to 211 in the Senate on Thursday (21 March).

The communist group of senators behind the vote applauded ‘a great victory’ and ‘all those who reject the logic of free trade agreements that exacerbate competition between peoples’.

Unusually for such an issue, the conservative Les républicains joined forces with the left to oppose the deal.

The government accused opponents of exploiting farmers’ discontent and the European election campaign to highlight this sensitive issue.

Since the beginning of the farmers’ protests in Europe, free trade agreements have been one of the main culprits, accused of sacrificing European agriculture in favour of industrial products and services.

The agreement was voted through by the French National Assembly in 2019, with President Emmanuel Macron holding an absolute majority.

Since then, the government has refused to allow the other chamber to vote, a condition for France to ratify its agreement with Brussels.

Although the purely commercial part of the agreement has been in force since 2017, full ratification of CETA requires the approval of all 27 EU member states. So far, 17 EU countries, including Germany, have given the green light, while France and Cyprus have refused to ratify.

During the debates before the vote, the government, represented by Foreign Trade Minister Franck Riester, denounced the “misinformation” that opponents had been spreading for several days, especially about the impact of CETA.

The minister insisted that the agreement was good for the French economy, businesses, agriculture and strategic relations with Canada.

Proof of this, he said, was the 33% increase in French exports to Canada over six years in all sectors, from chemicals to cosmetics and steel. The agri-food sector, at the centre of the debate, has tripled its exports. Cheese exports rose by 60%.

Above all, Riester dismissed fears about the risks of importing Canadian beef treated with hormones or antibiotics. This is “misinformation”, he said, adding that Canada does not currently export beef to France.

Senator and farmer Laurent Duplomb (Les Républicains) challenged the government’s rhetoric, arguing that “the 33% increase in exports is expressed in value [not volume] and more than half is artificially inflated by inflation”.

According to the Veblen Institute, which has criticised CETA, the volume of trade in goods will increase by just 0.7% between 2017 and 2022.

“As a result, in 2035, CETA will generate $4 per European resident per year, compared to $313 per Canadian citizen per year,” Duplomb claimed.

Duplomb also condemned the “silence of the European Commission”, whose inspections in Canada in 2019 and 2022 revealed shortcomings in animal traceability.

DIPLOMACY

NATO demands investigation into Azerbaijani plane crash amid Russian missile allegations

Published

on

NATO has urged a comprehensive investigation into the crash of an Azerbaijan Airlines plane on Wednesday morning, which resulted in the tragic loss of 38 lives. Suspicion is growing that Russian air defense systems may have been involved in the incident.

The Embraer E190 passenger aircraft was en route from Baku, the Azerbaijani capital, to Grozny, the Chechen capital, when passengers reportedly heard an explosion. The plane was diverted hundreds of kilometers off course before crashing near the Kazakh city of Aktau. Miraculously, 29 people survived the crash.

“Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and victims of Azerbaijan Airlines flight J28243,” NATO spokeswoman Farah Dakhlallah said in a statement on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday. “We wish a speedy recovery to those injured in the crash and call for a thorough investigation.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov echoed the call for patience, stating on Thursday, “We need to wait for the conclusion of the investigation,” while cautioning against premature assumptions.

Russia’s aviation watchdog attributed the crash to a collision with a flock of birds, which allegedly forced the aircraft to divert to Aktau. However, competing theories have emerged.

Media outlets including Reuters and Azerbaijan’s Caliber have speculated that the passenger plane was struck by a Russian air defense missile. These reports suggest the incident occurred in an area where Moscow has been actively targeting Ukrainian drones in recent weeks.

According to Caliber, citing Azerbaijani officials, the aircraft’s emergency request to land at three nearby Russian airports was denied. Instead, the plane was directed to fly over the Caspian Sea, exacerbating its perilous situation.

Further fueling these suspicions are reports of a simultaneous drone strike on Grozny. In a now-deleted Instagram post, Chechen Security Council Secretary Khamzat Kadyrov claimed that a drone attack on Grozny had been successfully neutralized.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Brazil-Britain relations strengthen amid global challenges

Published

on

As Donald Trump’s second term looms and European allies like France and Germany grapple with political instability, the United Kingdom is seeking new allies on the global stage, POLITICO reports.

In this context, Keir Starmer’s administration has been cultivating strong ties with Brazil and the Lula government. Since Starmer assumed office as Prime Minister in July, at least 12 British ministers have traveled to Brazil, signaling a deepening partnership.

This intensified engagement coincides with Brazil hosting this year’s G20 summit, but it also highlights shared priorities in addressing the global climate crisis. Since November, the UK and Brazil have collaborated on launching a multilateral clean energy agreement, setting ambitious new climate targets, and laying groundwork for the next major United Nations Climate Summit in Belém, Brazil, in 2025.

According to Robin Niblett, former director general of the British think tank Chatham House, these are precisely the types of “coalitions of the willing” that leaders with a “green conscience” must forge amid global uncertainty.

However, bilateral ties are not without challenges. Disagreements over Russia and Ukraine represent a major foreign policy hurdle for both nations. To strengthen their alliance, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has invited Starmer for another visit next year, aiming to “map opportunities and economic areas for collaboration,” according to an official Brazilian statement.

The relationship between the two leaders extends beyond formal diplomacy. According to Antonio Patriota, Brazil’s ambassador to London, their shared enthusiasm for football has added a personal touch to diplomatic meetings. In fact, the initial moments of their bilateral discussions at the G20 summit were dedicated to football, POLITICO noted.

Foreign Secretary David Lammy also underscored the importance of climate issues in British foreign policy during his visit to Brazil last summer, preceding the general election. Starmer, then opposition leader, first met Lula at COP28 in 2023. This meeting laid the groundwork for the Clean Power Alliance energy agreement, which now includes 11 nations and the African Union. The alliance has pledged to triple renewable energy output by 2030, according to a British government official.

As POLITICO reports, the United Kingdom’s pivot to Brazil also reflects its need for dependable allies post-Brexit, particularly as the United States becomes less reliable under Trump. The new U.S. energy secretary, businessman Chris Wright, has accused the UK of “impoverishing people” with its green policies, further complicating transatlantic relations.

In Brazil, Starmer sees an ally capable of bridging the divide between developed nations, such as those in the G7 and NATO, and developing nations within the G20 and beyond. A UK government official described the partnership as exemplifying “cooperation between the Global North and South.”

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

China’s diplomatic influence in the Middle East at risk

Published

on

Beijing’s brokering of a historic peace deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia last year marked a significant shift in China’s engagement with the Middle East. The agreement was seen as a landmark achievement, positioning China as a mediator in one of the world’s most volatile regions.

For Tehran, facing economic and geopolitical pressure from the Biden administration, the deal was a diplomatic breakthrough. It also offered a chance to reduce isolation with Beijing’s support.

However, the recent overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and the setbacks faced by Hamas and Hezbollah in their conflict with Israel have fragmented Iran’s regional influence. These developments, coupled with growing threats from Israel, pose significant challenges to Tehran’s strategic position.

Experts suggest that the return of a hawkish U.S. administration under Donald Trump could strengthen the China-Iran alliance. Shared pressures may push both nations toward closer cooperation, reshaping the region’s diplomatic dynamics.

Chinese analysts caution, however, that Beijing’s ability to sustain its mediation role may be at risk. Rising tensions between Tehran and other regional powers could jeopardize the peace China’s diplomacy has fostered. Such conflicts would not only test Beijing’s influence but also challenge its long-term strategic interests in the Middle East.

Fan Hongda, a professor at the Institute of Middle East Studies at Shanghai University of International Studies, notes that U.S. pressure on Iran is unlikely to wane. “Coupled with Israel’s strikes and the destruction of Iranian-backed forces such as Hamas and Hezbollah last year, this will compel Iran to favor closer cooperation with other powers, including China and Russia,” Fan remarked.

Iran’s economic woes date back to the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the imposition of stricter sanctions under the “maximum pressure” campaign. These sanctions continue to hinder Tehran’s economy, influencing its strategic partnerships and regional policies.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey