Diplomacy
International experts in Istanbul chart a path for Palestinian statehood beyond genocide
Palestinian and international experts convened in Istanbul for the international conference titled From Genocide to the Building of the Palestinian State, bringing together specialists from Palestine, Türkiye, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Europe. Speakers addressed the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which they described as a genocide, the challenges in Palestine’s state-building process, and the role of the international community. The conference emphasized the need to overcome internal Palestinian divisions and increase diplomatic pressure on Israel. Former High Representative of European Union Joseph Borrell sent his greetings to the conference.
Palestinian opinion leaders, academics, and regional experts from various countries gathered for the international conference, From Genocide to the Building of the Palestinian State.
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the Palestinian statehood process, and the role of the international community were discussed in a multifaceted manner at a conference jointly organized in Istanbul by Harici Media, the Palestinian Dialogue Group, and the Center for International Relations and Diplomacy (MID).
In his opening speech, Tunc Akkoc, Editor-in-Chief of Harici, highlighted the two contrasting aspects of the Palestinian issue.
“On one hand, we are witnessing perhaps the greatest tragedy in the history of the Palestinian people. On the other, critical steps are being taken towards the international recognition of a legitimate Palestinian state,” Akkoc said.
Describing the Palestinian issue as one of the world’s most pressing problems, Akkoc stated that they would address it from various perspectives. “We aim to make a small contribution to the solution by reaching a wide audience through the power of media and online publications,” he commented.
Head of Palestinian Dialogue Group Sadeq Abu Amer, said in his opening speech, “The Palestinian people have been facing genocide, ethnic cleansing, and attempts to erase their identity for a century; today, this tragedy has reached its most dangerous stage in Gaza.” Drawing attention to the double standards of the international system, Abu Amer said, “However, the unprecedented solidarity among peoples around the world could become a new tool for political pressure.” He emphasized, “The Palestinian cause is not only the responsibility of Palestinians, but also the shared humanitarian responsibility of everyone who believes in freedom and justice.”
Mehmet Rakipoglu, Information Production and Publishing Coordinator of MID, noted that Israel’s genocide has been registered by international institutions. “We must now focus on the question of ‘what can we do next, how can Palestinian statehood be achieved?'” he stated.
Rakipoglu argued that not only Israel’s military power but also its system of knowledge and thought must be dismantled. “For this reason, we must build an epistemological Al-Aqsa Flood,” he said.
“The Palestinian national movement has lost its ability to evaluate its mistakes”
Researcher and journalist Yusuf Fakir al-Din drew attention to the internal problems within the Palestinian national movement. “The Palestinian national movement has lost its ability to evaluate and correct its own mistakes. Division has intensified accusations, accelerating national dissolution and weakening the resistance,” he assessed.
He emphasized that national dialogue is the most urgent priority to end the war and regain the initiative.

“Europe must no longer remain on the sidelines”
Professor Kalypso Nicolaidis from the European University Institute stated that the meeting, held before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, was of critical importance.
“Many countries, including France and the United Kingdom, are joining the 147 states that recognize Palestine. This step has the potential to change the balance in the Security Council,” Nicolaidis said.
She noted that Europe must no longer remain on the sidelines and should approach the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with a more decisive plan.
Nicolaidis also said that former High Representative European Union Joseph Borrell had sent his greetings to the conference.

“Israel’s goal is to expel Palestinians”
Khalil Shaheen, Director of the Palestinian Center for Policy Research and Strategic Studies (MASARAT), analyzed the objectives of the political transformation in Israel.
“The transformation that has been ongoing in Israel for three decades, with the rise of the religious Zionist right, aims for the forced expulsion of Palestinians. The attempt at forced migration and altering the demographic balance in Gaza is being pursued just as dangerously in the West Bank,” he explained.
Palestinian researcher and journalist Sameer Al Zapen expressed that the Palestinian issue has become incomprehensible due to the endless division between Hamas and Fatah.
“Today, the Palestinian issue has become incomprehensible; political discourse is now detached from real meaning. After the Al-Aqsa Flood, the Palestinian cause faces either liquidation or a transformation similar to the 1948 Nakba,” al-Zaben said.
“Türkiye’s mediation was rejected by Israel”
Professor Husam al-Dajani from Ummah University in Gaza discussed mediation efforts. “Türkiye’s mediation attempt was categorically rejected by Israel. The circle of mediation remained between Egypt, Qatar, and the US, with Washington not advancing the process without Israel’s approval,” he shared.
Al-Dajani said that previous mediations did not address the occupation, which is the root of the problem, and that any solution must begin with stopping the genocide.
“Words are not enough to describe Gaza”
Mohammed Shehadeh from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) stated that there are no words left to describe the situation in Gaza. “Words are not enough to describe Gaza; catastrophe, apocalypse, dystopia—none are sufficient to convey what is happening. UN reports first described Gaza as a ‘graveyard for children,’ then a ‘disaster zone,’ and finally said, ‘there are no words left,'” he expressed.
Shehadeh said that Israel is emptying words like “genocide” of their meaning and highlighted the importance of international activism.
“A European official told me, ‘If you want to mobilize us, protest day and night in front of our ministry, take us to court.’ If activism slows down, they will gain time to make people forget the genocide,” he added.

“The issue is not Palestine, but an Israel problem”
Professor Dr. Mehmet Ozkan from the Turkish National Defence University, argued that the problem needs to be correctly identified. “We should no longer be talking about a Palestinian issue in our region, but directly about an Israel problem; its aggressive and expansionist policies have become clear,” he said.
Ozkan recalled that Türkiye has been one of the countries showing the strongest reaction against Israel from the very beginning.
Dr. Khalil A. al-Khalil from Saudi Arabia said that the Palestinian cause has a universal character and that Israel is becoming increasingly isolated in the international arena.
Hamid Azimi from the Iran Mersad Strategic Research Center noted that the recognition of a Palestinian state is a tool, while the existence of the people and their land is what truly matters.
“Public reaction in Europe has not been reflected in policy”
Dr. H.A. Hellyer from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) stated that the United Kingdom and many European countries are preparing to recognize a Palestinian state, but this should not be seen as a reward or punishment.
“Public opinion in Europe is clearly opposed to what Israel is doing in Gaza, but this reaction has not yet been fully reflected in state policies and practices,” Hellyer noted.
Stephan Ossenkopp from the Schiller Institute expressed that the world’s transition to a multipolar order offers an opportunity for a just solution for Palestine, but Germany has not changed its policy of full support for Israel.
“Germany is violating its ‘Never again’ pledge”
Former member of the German Bundestag, Zaklin Nastic, said that Germany is openly violating its “Never again!” pledge by complicity in the genocide in Gaza through arms shipments and political support.
“When they say ‘Never again!’, we ask: For whom? The responsibility for universal human rights and the protection of the oppressed is being abused in Germany today,” she stated.
Russian academic and diplomat Aleksandr Sotnichenko noted that liberal utopias have collapsed and that the siege of Gaza can be compared to the 1941-44 siege of Leningrad.
Professor Dr. Hasan Unal from Baskent University predicted that the world is moving towards a multipolar order no longer dominated by the West, and this will weaken Western support for Israel over time.
“Israel’s policy of declaring everyone an enemy is not sustainable,” he added.

Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
