Diplomacy
Taiwan campaign in the European Parliament: Delegation visits Taipei
In an initiative led by German politicians, the European Parliament (EP) is advocating for Taiwan’s inclusion in UN organizations. A recent visit by an EP delegation to Taipei has intensified tensions concerning Taiwan.
Last week, the EP adopted a resolution urging Taiwan’s inclusion in UN agencies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO). The resolution directly challenges UN Resolution 2758 from 1971, which excludes Taiwanese representation in the UN and its agencies.
This stance represents a significant challenge to the “one China” principle—a sensitive issue for Beijing, where any deviation from this policy is viewed as a potential trigger for severe repercussions, including military conflict.
The draft resolution was proposed by members of the Inter-Parliamentary China Alliance (IPAC), a lobbying organization active internationally. IPAC has promoted similar resolutions in other legislatures, with a German IPAC member currently leading an EP delegation in Taiwan.
Taiwan as a ‘key partner’ of the EU
The EP’s resolution, passed with a substantial majority (432 votes in favor, 60 against, and 71 abstentions), advocates for a strong stance against China on the Taiwan issue, emphasizing the importance of supporting Taiwan’s autonomy.
According to the resolution, Taiwan is an “important partner” for the EU, and closer cooperation is encouraged. Specifically, it promotes the exchange of parliamentary delegations, enhanced political cooperation, and deeper collaboration in science, education, culture, sports, and regional partnerships. Additional technical cooperation is proposed with Taiwanese fire and police services.
The resolution also calls on the European Commission to initiate negotiations on a bilateral investment agreement “without delay.” It stresses the need for Taiwan’s inclusion in international bodies, such as UN agencies like WHO, as well as organizations like Interpol and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
UN Resolution 2758: A contentious interpretation
The EP references UN Resolution 2758 (25 October 1971) to support its call for Taiwan’s inclusion in multilateral organizations. This resolution shifted UN recognition from Taiwan, represented as the “Republic of China,” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “sole legitimate representative of China.”
UN Resolution 2758 excluded “the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek” from the UN, resulting in Taiwan’s loss of representation in UN agencies. The EP argues that this resolution makes no explicit reference to Taiwan’s status, accusing Beijing of “falsifying history and international norms” by using this resolution to justify its claims over Taiwan.
Building a lobby against China
Following the EP’s example, similar resolutions were passed by the Australian Senate on August 21, 2024, and by the Dutch Lower House on September 12, 2024. These actions align with IPAC’s goal of encouraging parliamentary support for Taiwan across various countries. IPAC was established in June 2020, with German Green politician Reinhard Bütikofer among its founders, as part of an effort to “counter the rise of the People’s Republic of China.”
Comprising roughly 250 members from 40 parliaments, IPAC regularly initiates resolutions on China-related issues.
IPAC’s ‘model resolution’
In late July, IPAC adopted a “model resolution” that seeks a reinterpretation of UN Resolution 2758, aiming to allow Taiwan’s participation in “international organizations,” including UN agencies. IPAC advocates for comprehensive support for “Taiwan’s legitimate aspirations for broader engagement in UN organizations and beyond.”
The Australian Senate resolution was backed by IPAC members Senator David Fawcett (Liberal Party) and Senator Deborah O’Neill (Labor Party), while the Dutch resolution was proposed by IPAC member Jan Paternotte (Democrats 66). German IPAC members also played key roles in the EP’s resolution, particularly Engin Eroğlu (Freie Wähler) and MEP Michael Gahler (CDU).
EP delegation examines cooperation opportunities in Taiwan
Led by IPAC member Michael Gahler, a European Parliament delegation arrived in Taiwan on Sunday for a six-day visit. The delegation, which includes Bernard Guetta of Macron’s Renaissance party, plans to meet with Taiwanese officials, including Vice-President Hsiao Bi-khim and Vice Foreign Minister François Wu, as well as visit the Taiwanese parliament.
The delegation aims to strengthen EU-Taiwan economic ties, assess the geopolitical landscape, and “explore opportunities for future cooperation.”
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
