Connect with us

AMERICA

The US Army and Texan Bandidos in Ukraine

Published

on

Confirming the presence of the US troops in Ukraine, the Pentagon has drawn up a three-stage action plan on blocking the illegal arms trafficking in Eastern Europe. The US inspection network does not only include Ukraine, but also other countries neighboring Ukraine or its neighbors across the sea. While the names of the countries included in this network to be established not mentioned, the reality that an illegal arms market similar to that in the Middle East and the Balkans, are being implicitly admitted.

According to an official statement by the US Department of Defense (Pentagon) regarding the activities of the deployed US troops in Ukraine, military advisors from the US military will conduct arms inspections in Ukraine. And the main subject of the inspection is summarized as; the final destination of the US/Western arms supplies. It will be inspected whether these high-tech conventional weapons are properly used at the front. And the most important part would be to ensure that these arms would not fall into the hands of the Russians, and to “prevent” the rise of an illegal arms market.

The Pentagon held a press conference with journalists on the issue on October 31st but refrained to share any information on the number of specialists deployed in Ukraine or the locations they will serve. These inspectors “are not to be deployed in close combat zones” the officials said.

Thus, this statement officially confirmed the presence and the activities of the US military in Ukraine, apart from the military personnel protecting the US diplomats in Kiev. The Pentagon had evacuated all US troops from the country on February 14th, exactly 10 days before the conflict began.

Pentagon: There is suspicion, but no evidence

The Pentagon officials also said they did not see “any solid evidence” of illicit diversion of the US arms supplies sent to Ukraine, while adding, “Nevertheless, we are aware of the possibility of an illicit arms diversion. We are actively taking all available actions to prevent such a thing from happening.”

And the Republican criticisms on the destination of arms sent to Ukraine, also had a major impact, while the case was upon an investigation process. The Minority (Republican) leader in the House of Representatives Kevin McCarty, said in a speech he made in October that Republicans would not hand a “blank check” to Ukraine.

The Tweet McCarty has pinned on his Twitter account on October 8th, is about the Biden family’s relationship with the Ukrainian government:

“Fact: Joe Biden’s family members profited in foreign regions where he had influence as vice president. Hunter Biden sat on the board of a Ukrainian company in an industry in which he had no experience. His only qualification was that his father ran point on US-Ukraine policy.”

Admitting the existence of an arms black market

It is very possible to say that the arms sent to Ukraine could be sold on the black market, and that more “black markets” could emerge where terror groups can acquire advanced weapons, based on some similar experiences in the Middle East. Some of these risks are clearly explained in the “US Plan to Counter Illicit Diversion of Certain Advanced Conventional Weapons in Eastern Europe” issued by the US Department of Defense on October 27th:

“Wars can provide opportunities for weapons to fall into private hands via theft or illicit sales, sometimes creating black markets for arms that endure for decades.  A variety of criminal and non-state actors may attempt to acquire weapons from sources in Ukraine during or following the conflict, as occurred after the Balkans Wars in the 1990s.”

According to the Pentagon plan, some special precautions must be taken especially on small arms, MANPADs and anti-tank missiles. It is quite possible that such weapons could be used in terrorist attacks targeting civilian aircrafts.

 The Pentagon’s preventive “capacity building” plan for Eastern Europe

Reading the Biden administration’s deployment of military advisors and inspectors to Ukraine only as a response to the criticisms from the Republicans and from Russia, is not sufficient enough to fully explain the overall approach of the US government. The Pentagon considers that if the arms thatare described in the plan document fall into the hands of the Russian military, Moscow may use it to “develop countermeasures, spread propaganda or conduct false flag operations.”

The plan to prevent arms diversion is not only limited to Ukraine, according to the Pentagon’s program.  The “action plan” covers three phases: short, medium and long-term, and the construction of a wide network of inspection all across Eastern Europe:

  • “Bolstering the ability of security forces in Ukraine and its neighboring states to account for and safeguard their arms and ammunition during transfer, in storage, and when deployed;
  • Strengthening border management and security in Ukraine and its neighboring states; and
  • Building the capacity of security forces, law enforcement officials, and border control agencies in Ukraine and its neighboring states to deter, detect, and interdict illicit trafficking of certain advanced conventional weapons.”

According to the plan put up in the document, the coordination mechanisms are defined as “Building the capacity of law enforcement officials and analysts in Ukraine and neighboring states to process and share information regarding interdicted or captured weapons”.

“Azov battalions could get out of control”

The Europol agency also warned last summer about the illegal diversion of arms in Ukraine across Europe. On October 27th the EU Commission tasked on the issue, also drafted a new law on the increasing allegations of arms trafficking over the Ukrainian war. The commission noted that the Ukrainian war constitutes a new source for illicit arms trafficking in Europe.

The figures also show the extent of this threat. Since last February, the Pentagon has sent around 10 thousand weapons including missile launchers, and around 64 million ammunitions for small arms to Ukraine.

According to a 2020 Pentagon report, the US has increased its military aid to Kiev to 400 million USD in 2019, from 30 million USD back in 2013. And the total amount of the military supply the Pentagon has sent to Kiev in the last eight months alone has reached 18 billion USD.

Experts consider a military aid of this magnitude to fall into the black market and into the hands of dangerous organizations, as within possibilities.

The US think-tank Responsible Statcraft, points out to the possibility of the course of the war in Ukraine to turn towards strengthening the radical groups, which can form independent paramilitaries with the help of these weapons. According to Jordan Cohen from the Cato Institute, it may get much more difficult for Volodymyr Zelensky to control organizations such as the Azov battalions in the future. Cohen describes the danger by saying, “If he loses control of those groups, then I think you are going to start seeing those groups kind of creating their own military units, and that is dangerous”.

The arms market of Bandidos in Ukraine

Founded in 1966 in Saint Leon TX, the Bandidos Motorcycle Club has a wide network of organizations around the world. This criminal organization is among the leading actors in the transportation of commodities of the arms black market into European heartland. At the end of October, Finnish National Bureau of Investigation announced that weapons of Western origin sent to Ukraine, may have reached the black markets in Finland, through criminal organizations such as the Bandidos. Speaking to Finnish publication Yle, Chief Inspector Christer Ahlgren stated: “Weapons delivered to Ukraine from various countries have also been found in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands”. According to Inspector Ahlgren, there are strong indications that these weapons are on their way to Finland.

Inspector Ahlgren says this black market is run by bike gangs:

“The three largest bike gangs in the world, which are all part of a wider international network, are all active in Finland. One of them is the Bandidos Motorcycle Club, which has cells in all major cities of Ukraine”.

Here, a huge gap is opening between Russia and the European Union, as Texan Bandidos and similar criminal organizations and US military inspectors play cat and mouse over Ukrainian soil.

AMERICA

Biden plans to write off Ukraine’s $4.6bn debt ahead of Trump

Published

on

President Joe Biden’s administration has officially notified Congress of its intention to forgive Ukraine’s $4.65 billion debt, a move tied to ongoing efforts to support the country amid its conflict with Russia.

This debt represents half of the $9 billion provided to Kyiv as part of the $61 billion aid package approved by Washington in April. Unlike other forms of assistance, this funding was issued as conditionally repayable loans, with provisions allowing the United States President to cancel up to 50% of the debt if deemed necessary.

In a statement, the U.S. State Department explained that the debt cancellation is intended to “help Ukraine win” and serves the national interests of the U.S., the EU, G7+, and NATO.”

According to Bloomberg, President Biden is determined to maximize aid to Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office. However, the decision to write off the debt has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans.

Republican Senator Rand Paul argued that the Biden administration’s decision places undue financial burden on the American public. He pledged to demand a vote in the Senate to challenge the proposal.

Despite this, Bloomberg notes that any effort to overturn the debt cancellation would require approval from both houses of Congress, a scenario that appears unlikely given the Democratic majority in the Senate. Furthermore, President Biden holds veto power, making reversal of the decision even more challenging.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced plans to exhaust all remaining aid approved by Congress before President Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emphasized that one of the administration’s key goals is to position Ukraine as strongly as possible—both militarily and at the negotiating table.

Pentagon officials reported that $9.3 billion in military aid is currently in the pipeline. Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh confirmed plans for weekly arms deliveries to Kyiv, with the aim of expediting aid distribution before the presidential transition.

On November 20, the Pentagon unveiled an additional $275 million military aid package for Ukraine, further underscoring the administration’s commitment to strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Donald Trump taps Howard Lutnick to lead Commerce Department

Published

on

Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Wall Street investor and campaign donor Howard Lutnick as the new head of the U.S. Department of Commerce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of implementing the sweeping tariffs promised during his presidential campaign.

Lutnick, who co-chaired Trump’s transition team, had previously been considered for the role of Treasury Secretary. He is also the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent investment firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, Trump declared that Lutnick would be “directly responsible” for leading the Commerce Department and overseeing the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The USTR, established in 1974 to manage negotiations with U.S. trading partners, traditionally reports directly to the president. If confirmed by the Senate, the 63-year-old Lutnick will play a pivotal role in aiding U.S. businesses and executing Trump’s proposed tariffs on international trade partners.

Trump has outlined plans for a 60% tariff on imports from China and a global tariff of up to 20%, signaling a major shift in U.S. trade policy.

Lutnick, despite lacking prior government experience, has been a steadfast advocate for Trump’s economic agenda. During a New York campaign rally, Lutnick remarked, “When was America great? At the turn of the century, our economy was floundering! That was 125 years ago. We had no income tax and all we had were tariffs.”

While Lutnick has emerged as a major donor to Trump, he has also supported establishment Democrats and Republicans in the past, including Chuck Schumer and Jeb Bush. He contributed to both Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 campaigns, hosting a fundraiser for her in 2015. Lutnick maintains a personal friendship with the Clintons, noting their attendance at a Cantor Fitzgerald fundraiser in September 2022.

Lutnick has also maintained a long-standing relationship with Trump, even appearing on The Celebrity Apprentice in 2008. He disclosed to the Financial Times in October that he has donated over $10 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and another $500,000 to the transition team, totaling approximately $75 million.

Treasury Secretary selection process still uncertain

The position of Treasury Secretary, one of the most significant roles in Trump’s administration, remains undecided. Lutnick’s name has been floated for the role, though he faces competition from hedge fund manager Scott Bessent, private equity billionaire Marc Rowan, and former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh.

Marc Rowan, the CEO of Apollo Global Management, has emerged as a leading contender and is expected to meet with Trump to present his case. Rowan’s supporters cite his extensive expertise in financial markets, though competition remains fierce.

Forecasting site Polymarket currently lists Warsh as the favorite for Treasury Secretary, followed by Bessent, Rowan, and William Hagerty. If unsuccessful in his bid for Treasury Secretary, Bessent is reportedly vying for the chairmanship of the National Economic Council.

Trump names Mehmet Oz to run Medicare and Medicaid

Trump also announced on Tuesday his nomination of Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Describing Oz as “one of the most talented physicians” capable of “making America healthy again,” Trump expressed confidence in Oz’s ability to reduce waste and fraud within the nation’s largest government agency.

Dr. Oz, a former heart surgeon and Columbia University professor, rose to prominence as Oprah Winfrey’s health expert before hosting his own popular talk show. However, his career has been controversial, with critics accusing him of promoting scientifically dubious theories and unproven treatments.

Oz’s political experience includes a 2022 Senate race in Pennsylvania, where he was endorsed by Trump but ultimately lost to Democrat John Fetterman.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

U.S. may start its plan to separate Google from Chrome

Published

on

The Department of Justice (DOJ) may move forward with plans to force the sale of Google’s Chrome web browser as part of its ongoing antitrust case against Alphabet (Google).

According to sources familiar with the case, the department intends to ask the judge—who ruled in August that Google illegally monopolized the search market—to address concerns related to artificial intelligence (AI) and the Android smartphone operating system. This information was reported by Bloomberg.

Antitrust officials, along with participating state attorneys, are expected to recommend that federal Judge Amit Mehta impose data licensing requirements on Google. These officials have indicated that Chrome, the world’s most widely used browser, is a critical gateway for many users accessing Google Search. For this reason, they are urging the judge to mandate the sale of Chrome.

Officials stated that a Chrome sale could be considered later if other settlement measures fail to foster a more competitive market. Currently, Google Chrome commands a dominant 61% share of the U.S. browser market, according to StatCounter, a web traffic analysis service.

Over the past three months, state attorneys interviewed numerous companies to prepare their recommendations. Officials noted that some recommendations are still under review, and details may evolve before submission.

While a proposal to force Google to sell its Android platform was considered, officials have since stepped back from this more aggressive option.

If Judge Mehta adopts these recommendations, the ruling could significantly reshape the online search market and influence the emerging artificial intelligence industry.

The case, originally filed during the Trump administration and continued under President Joe Biden, represents one of the most aggressive efforts to regulate a major tech company in decades. The last comparable attempt was Washington’s unsuccessful bid to break up Microsoft in the early 2000s.

Chrome plays a crucial role in Google’s advertising business by providing user data that enhances ad targeting, a primary revenue source. Additionally, Google has been leveraging Chrome to promote Gemini, its new AI bot. Gemini has the potential to evolve from a simple answer bot to a comprehensive assistant, supporting users across the web.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh estimates that Chrome could be worth $15–20 billion if sold, considering its more than 3 billion monthly active users. However, Bob O’Donnell of TECHnalysis Research notes that Chrome’s value depends on its integration with other services, stating: “It’s not directly monetizable. It acts as a gateway to other things. Monetization would depend on how buyers link Chrome to their services.”

Google has strongly opposed the DOJ’s recommendations. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, criticized the move as government overreach, arguing: “This agenda goes far beyond the legal issues in this case and will harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at a critical time.”

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt echoed this sentiment in an interview with CNBC. He emphasized the value of Chrome in enhancing the Google ecosystem, stating: “Singling out these companies won’t fundamentally solve the broader issues.”

In a blog post, Google warned that under new ownership, Chrome might no longer remain free or receive the same level of investment, potentially leading to a shift in its business model.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey