Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Trump Doctrine: ‘The purpose of the Greenland exit is to send a strong message to China’

Published

on

The repercussions of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat to annex Greenland, an autonomous island of Denmark, without excluding the possibility of using military force, continue to unfold.

A report in the New York Post (NYP) emphasizes that Trump’s move raises the question, “Why?” and includes insights from a source close to Trump’s transition team.

Claiming that Greenland is becoming increasingly important for strategists in many countries, especially Washington, due to its location on vital shipping routes and the presence of key raw materials rarely found elsewhere, the NYP reported that the source said, “To send a strong and deliberate message to Beijing. Not just talk. It’s action. Make America ambitious again,” the source was quoted as saying.

The source also noted that the president-elect drew the first framework of the “Trump Doctrine.”

According to the Wilson Center, a foreign policy think tank, the U.S. is locked in a “three-cornered” struggle with Russia and China for the Arctic’s natural resources, such as lithium, cobalt, and graphite.

Alex Plitsas of the Atlantic Council said, “There are two main reasons [for annexing Greenland]. First, the large deposits of rare earth elements, which are essential for critical defense and electronics production. Second, Greenland has a legitimately large claim to the Arctic, which will give the United States a stronger position as competition for navigation and resources there heats up.”

U.S.-China-Russia rivalry in the Arctic

For years, the U.S. has been in a “quiet tug-of-war” with China and Russia over access to the Arctic and has been sending military icebreakers to explore the resource-rich island, the NYP reports.

The Arctic is thought to be abundant in rare earth minerals, which are used in everything from mobile phones to weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. and Western countries are mostly dependent on China for these minerals.

According to Plitsas, this dependence on Beijing “is not sustainable given geopolitical realities.” He argues, “There are other large deposits in places like Afghanistan, which are also unsustainable for various reasons.”

“With increasing demand for electric vehicles, renewable energy systems, and advanced electronics, the United States relies heavily on critical materials to spur innovation and maintain global economic competitiveness,” the Wilson Center wrote in its 2023 report.

Competition over the Arctic, on the other hand, has intensified in recent years due to climate change, which has led to the melting of glaciers that previously made it almost impossible to access resources. “Warming has led to greater freedom of navigation in the Arctic,” Plitsas recalls.

U.S. ‘icebreaker ship’ discomfort

But according to the NYP, the Americans have so far lagged behind their rivals, partly due to limited U.S. access to the region and a relatively small number of icebreakers.

This problem has long troubled some Republicans, including Mike Waltz, whom Trump appointed as national security adviser. In a 2017 post on X, Waltz wrote, “In the Arctic, where we will compete for natural resources, the Coast Guard needs more than one icebreaker! Russia has dozens!”

The Coast Guard currently has only two of the vital vessels, but Waltz recently promised to ask for more in the 119th Congress in response to a post on X calling for “a dozen more” icebreakers.

Additional icebreakers and the acquisition of Greenland are topics Trump has chosen to highlight as the U.S. builds more rare earth mineral processing plants as part of an effort to reduce its dependence on China.

The United States is home to only 1.3 percent of the world’s rare earth minerals, compared to 70 percent for China.

Greenland open to non-annexation options

Kuno Fencker, a member of Greenland’s parliament, told CNN on Tuesday that the island only gained full autonomy in 2009 and that since then, the regional government has been working to achieve sovereignty.

“We may have a lot of disagreements here about property, because we are trying to create a sovereign country as Greenland and we want to establish the state of Greenland,” Fencker said, adding that the regional government may be willing to work on a free association agreement with the United States.

The U.S. already has such agreements with Pacific island states such as Palau. Such agreements require Washington to provide financial assistance to the countries entering into the free relationship, as well as grant island citizens the right to work and live in the U.S. as “permanent residents.”

“The main [point] here is that Greenland [status] should be a monumental decision, what kind of state we want to be, and also who we should cooperate with, and our closest allies, which, you know, we are under the rule of Denmark,” Fencker said.

The new White House is open to other options

The source told NYP that Trump may be willing to discuss alternative arrangements with Greenland authorities other than full annexation.

“There is flexibility in discussing the best ways to strengthen America’s security, so I think it’s fair to say there is more than one option,” the source said.

The U.S. has long wanted to own Greenland. When it bought Alaska from Russia in 1867, it also considered bidding for the island in the North Atlantic.

Almost eighty years later, after the Second World War, the U.S. offered Greenland $100 million in gold bullion, which Denmark rejected.

But the offer led to a defense deal that gave the U.S. access to Thule Air Base, now Pituffik Spaceport, the northernmost outpost of the military, which was critical during the Cold War because of its proximity to Russia.

DIPLOMACY

Trump’s tariffs boost interest in German, Japanese bonds

Published

on

With investors seeking safe havens for investment for the first time in years, US Treasury bonds face serious competition from global funds.

The yields on benchmark 10-year Treasury bonds had fallen by approximately 40 basis points this year. With US President Donald Trump’s barrage of tariffs, which are thought to increase the risk of recession, they briefly fell below 4% on Monday.

According to Bloomberg, similar rates have risen in both Europe and Japan. In Germany, the 10-year bond rose to 2.61%, reflecting expectations that bond issuance will increase as the government increases defense spending.

Meanwhile, the rate on 10-year Japanese bonds has also risen after years around zero, and is currently around 1.25% as investors prepare for tighter monetary policy.

While both are still well below US bond yields, they are at levels that make them appear more attractive than Treasury bonds for European and Japanese investors who are protected from dollar risk when buying US securities.

This may convince investors to shift to their own markets, where the policy outlook is more stable.

“The idea that the administration’s various policies could undermine foreign demand for Treasury bonds is gaining traction,” said Matthew Raskin, head of US interest rates research at Deutsche Bank.

Deutsche Bank also warned of a “confidence crisis” in the dollar, while UBS Group believes the euro would get a “shot in the arm” in its status as a global reserve currency.

On the other hand, some believe this change should be viewed with skepticism. The German government bond, Bund, looked similarly attractive in mid-2023, but an aggressive sell-off in Treasury bonds pushed 10-year US yields to 5%, eroding Europe’s yield advantage.

If tariffs revive inflation, this could push US yields higher again.

But according to Bloomberg, even the discussion of such a shift in flows shows that investors are preparing for Europe to play a bigger role in global markets as competition for capital intensifies.

This could lead to greater fragility in the US Treasury market, which has been under attack from buyers in recent years amid concerns that supply could increase.

One of the early tests will take place on Tuesday, when the US government sells $58 billion of three-year bonds, followed by the sale of 10- and 30-year bonds later this week.

Traditionally, the US budget deficit has been financed in part by a wave of capital flowing into Treasury bonds from around the world.

According to Barclays’ analysis of fund flow data, foreign ownership of US Treasury bonds accounts for about a third of the market, and the foreign sector was the largest source of US bond demand last year.

This reflected net purchases of $910 billion, about half of which were in Treasury bonds.

According to US government data, the vast majority of foreign Treasury assets are in longer maturities. Ales Koutny, international interest rates manager at Vanguard, said this means that as foreign demand decreases, it could steepen the US yield curve, meaning long-term rates will rise relative to short-term rates.

An early indication of how investors are navigating global yield shifts may emerge in a few days. The new fiscal year has just begun in Japan, and this is a period when companies there typically review their allocation strategies.

Japan is a key player in global bond markets due to the Bank of Japan’s decades-long ultra-low interest rate policy, which has pushed investors to seek yield.

Germany initiated the change in early March, announcing plans to allocate hundreds of billions of euros for defense and infrastructure. Bund yields rose as investors priced in bond issuance to cover the spending.

The European Union’s large pool of savings surplus means it is the largest foreign holder of US public debt, while also playing a large role in US corporate finance.

If European countries meaningfully increase their investments, these savings could be kept at home.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Japan seeks peace treaty with Russia despite territorial dispute

Published

on

The Japanese Foreign Ministry, in its annual Blue Book report outlining key diplomatic trends, has declared its intention to continue negotiations with Russia to sign a peace treaty and resolve the issue of the “northern territories” (Tokyo’s term for the Southern Kurils), despite the challenging relationship.

These islands include Kunashir, Shikotan, Iturup, and the Habomai archipelago.

The ministry once again described these territories as “illegally occupied” and stated that the Kuril Islands issue is the greatest concern in Japan-Russia relations.

Japan and the Soviet Union, of which the Russian Federation is the successor, have not signed a peace treaty following World War II due to the territorial dispute over the Southern Kurils.

In 2022, Russia refused to continue negotiations on this matter after Japan imposed sanctions following the start of the military intervention in Ukraine.

Moscow also withdrew from dialogue on developing joint economic activities in the Southern Kurils.

The report also emphasized that the Japanese government is pursuing a policy of gradually reducing its dependence on Russian energy resources, including oil and coal, while acting to minimize the negative impact on public life and business.

At the same time, the report stated that Japan intends to maintain its participation in the Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects.

The document stated, “The Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 oil and gas development projects are important for Japan’s energy security in terms of ensuring a stable supply in the medium and long term, and we intend to maintain our participation in them.”

In the previous version of the Blue Book, the Japanese Foreign Ministry also declared its intention to maintain its participation in the Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2 projects.

In the Sakhalin-1 project, where Sokol-grade oil is produced, the Japanese consortium Sodeco (whose main shareholder is the Japanese government, and its members are private companies such as Japex, Itochu, Marubeni, Inpex) has a 30% stake.

The American company ExxonMobil also had the same stake but announced its withdrawal from the project in 2022.

The new managing operator of Sakhalin-1 became Sakhalinmorneftegaz-Shelf, a subsidiary of Rosneft (which previously had an 11.5% stake).

All assets of the consortium running the Sakhalin-1 project were transferred to Russian ownership.

Additionally, ONGC Videsh Ltd (India’s state oil company) has a 20% stake in Sakhalin-1, and RN-Astra (a subsidiary of Rosneft) has an 8.5% stake.

Although Japan does not import fuel under the project, Tokyo considers Sakhalin-1 important for ensuring supply diversity and stability.

The then-Japanese Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Yasutoshi Nishimura, touched on this issue in a statement in the fall of 2022.

Nishimura noted that Japan is 95% dependent on the Middle East for its oil supply.

Japan is one of the world’s largest importers of liquefied natural gas (LNG), sourcing approximately 9% of its total LNG volume purchased from Sakhalin-2.

Japanese companies Mitsui and Mitsubishi hold 12.5% and 10% stakes in Sakhalin-2, respectively, and confirmed their participation in the project in the fall of 2022.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

US-Iran talks to begin in Oman on April 12

Published

on

Negotiations between the US and Iran, the first contact since US President Donald Trump’s return to office, will begin in Oman on April 12. While the Iranian side describes these talks as “indirect,” Trump suggests the talks will take place in a direct diplomacy format. Although different expressions are used between the parties on this matter, there is a common understanding that the talks will be high-level.

Trump said in a statement after hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House last night, “We are talking directly to Iran. Perhaps a deal will be made that will be wonderful. This would be really great for Iran. We will meet at the highest level on Saturday.”

Just hours after this statement, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi confirmed the talks in a post on his social media account, but explained the format differently: “Iran and the US will meet for high-level indirect talks in Oman on Saturday. This is as much an opportunity as it is a test. The ball is now in the US’s court.”

Araqchi, Witkoff to chair the talks

According to information in the Iranian press, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi will head the Iranian delegation in the negotiations, while US Special Representative for the Middle East Steve Witkoff will head the US delegation. No official statement has yet been made regarding how many days the talks will last.

According to sources speaking to Amwaj Media, Iranian officials continue to state that the negotiations will be indirect. However, some political circles also state that the possibility of direct contact is not completely ruled out, depending on developments in Oman.

Is there a chance of success for the negotiations?

According to Trita Parsi, Vice President of the Washington-based Quincy Institute, Trump’s negotiation goal will determine the course of this process. According to Parsi, if the US side aims to completely eliminate Iran’s nuclear program with the “Libya model,” this diplomatic initiative may end before it begins. However, if Trump only aims for an audit mechanism that will prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the talks have a chance of success.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey