Connect with us

ASIA

Beijing diversifies reserves, US Treasury holdings fall

Published

on

Treasury bonds held by China fell to their lowest level since 2009 as Beijing held US government bonds through lower-profile accounts and turned to alternative assets.

According to data released by the US Treasury on Tuesday, the value of US government debt held by Chinese investors fell by $57 billion to $759 billion in 2024. This data does not include Treasury bonds held by China in accounts in other countries.

Analysts say this change partly reflects China’s desire to diversify its foreign reserves by buying assets such as gold. But they add that Beijing is also trying to conceal the true size of its Treasury holdings by shifting them to custody accounts registered in other countries.

‘China decided around 2010 that holding Treasuries was a risk, it looked optically bad to have such a large chunk of China’s wealth in the hands of a geopolitical rival,’ said Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former US Treasury official.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Setser added that the decline in China’s assets may have been exaggerated by some assets being moved to securities custodians such as Belgium-based Euroclear and Luxembourg-based Clearstream, which would increase those countries’ holdings in official data.

‘It has become more difficult over time to keep track of what China is doing and how flows from China are affecting global markets,’ Setser said.

Changes in foreign ownership of Treasuries are closely watched, given the US government’s need to finance a large budget deficit at a time when the central bank is reducing its own holdings of government debt.

China’s reported holdings of Treasuries have fallen by about $550 billion since peaking in 2011. The UK’s holdings increased by $34.2 billion in 2024, while Belgium’s holdings increased by $60.2 billion and Luxembourg’s by $84 billion. Japan remains the largest asset holder with over $1 trillion in holdings.

‘Not all the US Treasuries held by China are held directly in US institutions,’ a person familiar with the management of China’s foreign reserves told the Financial Times, adding that Beijing holds some of its reserve assets “for risk diversification purposes”. ‘It holds them through organizations such as Euroclear or Clearstream,’ he added.

‘However, as China continues to diversify its reserve assets, China’s total holdings in US Treasuries will gradually decline, a trend that is clear,’ he added.

Mark Sobel, US president of the Official Forum of Monetary and Financial Institutions, said the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) is increasing its exposure to other assets such as gold, which is often seen as a haven in times of economic and market stress.

The price of gold bullion has risen about 12 percent so far this year, a sign of growing demand among major buyers. Data from the World Gold Council showed that China became the third-largest gold buyer in the last three months of 2024, adding 15.24 tonnes to its reserves.

However, even though the PBoC’s gold holdings have increased by 13 percent over the past two years, bullion still represents a relatively small part of the central bank’s total reserves.

Sobel said the decline in Treasury assets does not mean that China is selling dollar assets in general. Some analysts say China has increased its buying of other safe US debt, such as agency bonds. Changes in the value of Chinese Treasury assets also reflect fluctuations in the market value of bonds.

‘I don’t know if they are reducing their total dollar holdings, but they are certainly investing in a wider range of instruments through different vehicles,’ Sobel said.

Analysts said the increase in Treasury bond holdings in the UK was due to the flow of money from foreign sovereign wealth funds, wealthy families, and hedge funds to London, while a similar dynamic was being experienced in Belgium.

Andy Brenner, NatAlliance’s head of international fixed income, said that given gilts yields are above Treasuries, buyers of Treasuries in the UK are unlikely to be British investors, but instead ‘it’s about foreign money, including Middle Eastern money’.

Setser said hedge funds may be holding US Treasuries in the UK as part of basis trading, a highly leveraged strategy in which funds buy US bonds and sell futures to profit from small price differences.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey