Asia
OIC meeting in Pakistan: From embarrassing to intensifying pressure

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), hosted by Pakistan, has held a meeting titled “Education of Girls in Islamic Societies” for the two days in Islamabad. This meeting has brought different reactions due to the non-participation of the Taliban, even though they were invited.
Some former diplomats believe that Pakistan, considering its influence in this organization, is trying to use such meetings to put pressure on the Taliban and fulfill its demands. On the other hand, some human and women’s rights activists say that the Taliban have refused to participate in this meeting because they have no reason to defend their actions.
Malala Yousafzai, one of the speakers of this meeting, asked the participants to recognize the gender apartheid of the Taliban in Afghanistan. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Union of Scholars of the Islamic World have emphasized in their statements that education for girls and boys is equally necessary and the conditions of education for girls in Islamic societies should be provided.
Pakistan has announced that the Taliban was invited to the meeting, but no representative attended the meeting. This meeting has provoked many reactions due to the discussion of Islamic countries about the education of girls, especially in the situation where the Taliban have banned the education of girls across Afghanistan.
Diplomats and political activists link the holding of this meeting by Pakistan and the absence of the Taliban to the recent tensions between Islamabad and the Taliban regime in Kabul. Zalamy Khalilzad, US former peace envoy for Afghanistan, also believes that Pakistan intends to embarrass the Taliban with this action.
Pakistan has a strong influence on OIC, likely the Taliban refused to participate.
Mohammad Ibrahim Ghafouri, the former representative of Afghanistan in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, had said recently that Pakistan has a strong influence in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and in this way wants to pressure the Taliban to comply with the demands of Islamabad.
According to him, most of the positions in the announcements and resolutions of this organization go back to the host countries. He emphasizes that after the escalation of tensions with the Taliban, Pakistan hosted the meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to put pressure on this group and to show that Islamabad has a special position and influence in international organizations and Islamic countries.
The former representative of Afghanistan in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation adds that this organization is traditionally aligned with Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan also has a prominent role in this organization due to the support of Arab countries.
According to him, in this meeting, only Iran may defend the Taliban’s position on girls’ education, and other countries will react to the Taliban from Islamabad’s position. He also states that most of the decisions of these meetings are advisory and not mandatory.
In a tweet in X, Zalmi Khalilzad said that Pakistan should shame the Taliban leader who has imposed severe restrictions on women’s education by holding a meeting on the education of girls in Islamic societies. He also considered this meeting as a propaganda move in the framework of the recent tensions between the Taliban and Pakistan.
The Afghan women and girls say that Taliban ashamed to join OIC due to their anti-women actions and restrictions
However, a number of women and girls say that the Taliban could not participate in this meeting due to shame and lack of reason to continue their restrictions. According to them, not only Pakistan but any other Islamic country that hosts such a meeting, this group has nothing to say and no reason to defend its “misogynist” and “gender apartheid” practices.

Mohammad Al-Issa, the Secretary General of the Muslim World League and President of the International Islamic Scholars Organization condemned the denial of education to girls as both unjust and contradictory to Islamic teachings.
An Afghan girl who doesn’t want to be named due to security reasons, said that the Taliban have done everything in their power to suppress and eliminate women under various guises for the past three years.
According to him, the Taliban know that they cannot defend their “misogynist” and gender “apartheid” practices against women in Afghanistan, even in Islamic organizations. Therefore, they prefer to remain silent because they have nothing to say and no reason to defend their actions.
Also, some human rights activists say that the message of the meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Pakistan is intellectual disarmament and the rejection of the Taliban’s “Sharia fatwa” on the education of girls and women. According to them, this meeting has clearly described the performance of the Taliban in conflict with religious values.”
Shima Azizi, a human rights activist had recently said that the Taliban’s focus is to show that they have all the religious fatwas in their possession. According to her, the Taliban try to legitimize all their policies by referring to “Sharia” rulings and religious fatwas, and therefore, they have banned the education of women in Afghanistan by citing their “Sharia” fatwas.
She furthered that the participants of the meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation called the prohibition of education and training of women a “great sin” citing Sharia rules. She says that the message of this meeting is to claim the monopoly of “Sharia” Fatwa from the Taliban.
She emphasized that if Taliban representatives participated in this meeting, the impact of the conference’s message in disarming this group’s intellectual weapons would increase. According to him, the presence of the Taliban in such a meeting meant their direct participation in the process of disarming themselves from the claim of issuing “Sharia” fatwas.
Malala Yousafiza, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, called on Islamic world to identify the Taliban regime as the cause of “gender apartheid.”
On the other hand, Malala Yousafzai, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, in her speech at this meeting, asked Islamic countries to identify the Taliban regime as the cause of gender apartheid.
He said that the Taliban cover their actions against women and girls with cultural and religious justifications. Referring to the Taliban’s decrees against women, Yousafzai asked the leaders of Islamic countries not to give legitimacy to the Taliban.
The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize has expressed his concern about the situation of women, and emphasized that the Taliban are destroying a whole generation of girls by implementing their anti-women policies. She asked Muslim scholars and leaders to prevent the systematic elimination of women and girls in Afghanistan.
Yousafzai said: “The mission of the Taliban is clear. They want to remove women and girls from every aspect of public life and erase them from society. The Taliban have created a system of gender apartheid.”
Hossein Ebrahim Taha, Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, said that this organization is committed to guaranteeing and promoting the education of girls in Islamic societies. He added that the Islamabad meeting under the title “Education of Girls in Islamic Societies: Challenges and Opportunities” was jointly organized by Pakistan and the World Muslim League.
The Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation said that educated women are a valuable asset for Muslim societies and their participation in development pursuits is very important. He added that the decisions and resolutions of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation at the summit level as well as the ministerial meetings unanimously and without any ambiguity emphasized the importance of girls’ education and prioritized the formulation of sustainable policies and the allocation of sufficient funds.
Education in Islam, is the right of both (men and women)
At the same time, Muhammad bin Abdul Karim Eisa, Secretary General of the Islamic World Union, said on the first day of the meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation on girls’ education, that some groups are hindering the education of girls by misusing the name of Islam.
According to him, such actions have no place in Islam, and efforts will be made to reject the considerations that hinder the education of girls in the name of Islam. He added that there are misconceptions in some Islamic societies, but Islamic scholars have gathered in this meeting to reject these beliefs and issue a joint statement.
He also stated that this statement emphasizes the necessity of women’s education for the progress of society and all scholars and Islamic schools agree on this. Moreover, the scholars of different religions agreed in this meeting that education is as necessary for women as for men.
Currently, Afghanistan is the only country in the world where girls and women are denied the right to education, study and work.
In the past three years, the Taliban have issued more than 80 prohibition orders against women and girls, which have excluded them from many aspects of social, cultural and economic life. Despite internal and external pressures, this group continues to impose restrictions and intensify the suppression of women’s demands.
Asia
Japan diverges from G7, urging restraint in Israel-Iran conflict

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has affirmed Tokyo’s position of calling for “maximum restraint” from both Israel and Iran, despite a G7 statement earlier this week that supported Israel’s “right to self-defense.”
During a meeting of ruling and opposition party leaders on Thursday, Ishiba stated, “What the foreign minister said is the stance of the Japanese government. The G7 is the G7,” as reported by Tomoko Tamura, head of the Japanese Communist Party.
Japan, a close US ally in Asia, has long maintained friendly relations with Iran and has historically adopted a neutral approach to Middle East diplomacy, distinguishing itself from the pro-Israel stance of US administrations. Tokyo relies on the Middle East for the overwhelming majority of its crude oil imports.
G7 leaders convened in Kananaskis, Canada, and issued a statement backing Israel’s attacks on Iran. The statement affirmed Israel’s right to self-defense and condemned Iran as the “main source of regional instability and terrorism.” On June 13, when Israel’s attacks on Iran began, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya declared: “The use of military force while diplomatic efforts are ongoing… is completely unacceptable and a source of deep regret. The Japanese government strongly condemns these actions.”
Iwaya added, “Japan is gravely concerned about the continuation of retaliatory attacks and strongly condemns any actions that could further escalate the situation.”
He continued, “Japan urges all parties to exercise maximum restraint and strongly calls for a de-escalation of tensions.”
During the meeting of party leaders, Tomoko Tamura, head of the Japanese Communist Party, highlighted the apparent contradiction between Iwaya’s statements and the joint G7 communiqué, suggesting the government was applying a “double standard.”
Prime Minister Ishiba responded, “What the foreign minister said is the stance of the Japanese government. The G7 is the G7.”
Meanwhile, the foreign minister announced at a press conference on Friday that a total of 87 Japanese nationals and their family members had been evacuated by land from Iran and Israel. Sixty-six individuals were evacuated from Iran to neighboring Azerbaijan, and 21 were evacuated from Israel to Jordan.
Following additional requests from Japanese citizens, a second land evacuation from Iran is scheduled for Saturday. Currently, there are approximately 220 Japanese nationals in Iran and about 1,000 in Israel.
In preparation for potential air evacuations, the government plans to dispatch two Air Self-Defense Force military transport aircraft to Djibouti in East Africa to have them on standby. With airports in Iran and Israel closed, Iwaya noted that the aircraft could be used if, for example, the airports reopen and conditions permit an airlift.
Asia
Iran-Israel war: Why US discusses regional conflict with Pakistan

US President Donald Trump and Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir held a special and important meeting during a time when tensions are rising in the Asian region. The meeting was held on Trump’s invitation and was not open to the media. However, both sides have released official statements afterward, which states that the main topics were discussed
The meeting focused on the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, Pakistan–India relations, especially the Kashmir issue, the situation in Afghanistan and future US–Pakistan cooperation.
Pakistan has recently improved its strategic position in the region. It has shown strong ties with China and is the only South Asian country openly supporting Iran in its conflict with Israel. Meanwhile, Pakistan remains an important player in Afghanistan.
Why the Pakistani Army Chief was invited to the US?
Although Pakistan has an elected civilian government, important decisions—especially related to foreign affairs and security—are often handled by the military. That’s why General Asim Munir was invited to meet Trump instead of the Prime Minister, General Munir’s influence has grown recently. After tensions with India, he was given the title of Field Marshal. His meeting with Trump is seen as a sign of his importance in both Pakistani and international politics.
According to the Pakistan Army’s media wing (ISPR): General Munir thanked President Trump for helping to ease recent tensions between Pakistan and India. Trump praised Pakistan’s role in fighting terrorism. Both agreed to work together in the future, especially in: Trade, Technology Minerals and energy Artificial intelligence Crypto currency and regional peace efforts as well.
President Trump also appreciated General Munir’s leadership during difficult times. Munir invited Trump to visit Pakistan, and Trump reportedly accepted the offer in principle.
Why US former peace envoy to Afghanistan, Khalilzad is not trusting Pakistan’s army chief
Former U.S. diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad criticized the meeting. He said General Munir cannot be trusted and reminded the U.S. that Pakistan has supported groups that harmed American soldiers in the past. According to Khalilzad, General Munir may be trying to get U.S. support for his interests in Afghanistan, which he believes could be risky for America.
Though no official list of US demands was made public, reports suggest a meeting was held in Saudi Arabia earlier, where American officials spoke with top Pakistani leaders. During that meeting, the U.S. reportedly made four key requests: Pakistan should help the U.S. in counterterrorism operations when needed. Pakistan should slowly reduce its relations with China. Pakistan should recognize Israel after Saudi Arabia does. If the U.S. attacks Iran, Pakistan should support the U.S. instead of staying neutral.
These demands are similar to earlier U.S.–Pakistan arrangements during the Cold War and the War on Terror.
What could be expected in the future?
This meeting could mark the beginning of a new phase in US–Pakistan relations. In the past, Pakistan helped the U.S. during the Soviet-Afghan War and after 9/11. Now, with tensions involving Iran, India, and Afghanistan—and China expanding its role—the U.S. may again be looking to Pakistan as a key partner in the region.
Time will tell whether this leads to a long-term partnership or just another temporary agreement based on short-term goals.
Asia
China pledges aid and signs friendship treaty at Central Asia summit

China concluded its latest engagement efforts in Central Asia on Tuesday by pledging 1.5 billion yuan (US$209 million) for livelihood and development projects in the region.
The six nations participating in the second China-Central Asia Summit also signed a historic permanent friendship treaty.
“China is ready to provide 1.5 billion yuan in grant assistance to Central Asian countries this year to support livelihood and development projects of common interest to each country,” Chinese President Xi Jinping stated in his opening address at the summit in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan.
“Additionally, China will offer 3,000 training opportunities to Central Asian countries over the next two years.”
Xi described the signing of the Permanent Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation Agreement as a milestone in relations between the six countries, calling it “an innovative initiative in China’s neighborhood diplomacy and a contribution that will benefit future generations.”
China has signed similar agreements with Russia and Pakistan.
Xi also emphasized the need for cooperation in a world that has entered “a new period of turbulence and transformation.”
State news agency Xinhua quoted Xi as saying, “There will be no winner in a tariff and trade war. Protectionists and hegemonists will harm both others and themselves.”
“The world should not be divided, but united; humanity should not revert to the law of the jungle, but work to build a common future for mankind,” he added.
Xi also announced the establishment of three cooperation centers focusing on poverty reduction, educational exchange, and desertification control, as well as a trade facilitation platform under the China-Central Asia cooperation framework.
In a statement on Wednesday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that China and the Central Asian countries are eager to improve road and rail connectivity and plan to open more direct flights to and from China to increase mutual exchange.
China will consider simplifying visa procedures with the five Central Asian countries, while all parties will study the feasibility of opening consulates.
Together with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, China will accelerate the modernization of existing port facilities and assess the need for new ones.
The summit was the second of its kind, following the inaugural one held two years ago in Xian, China.
These efforts reflect a deepening of China’s relations with Central Asia, which have historically focused on areas such as transportation infrastructure.
The region is a key part of the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s global development strategy, and China has invested heavily in energy pipelines, infrastructure, and mining projects in Central Asia.
However, China also wants to expand cooperation into sustainable development and renewable energy.
These investments were a major focus of Xi’s meetings with the leaders of the five Central Asian states.
During the meetings, Xi stressed the need to uphold multilateralism and the global trade order. This is part of Beijing’s effort to position itself as a more reliable partner following the US tariff war.
Meeting with Turkmen President Serdar Berdimuhamedov, Xi called for expanding gas cooperation and exploring opportunities in non-resource sectors.
Security was also on the agenda.
“The two countries should further strengthen law enforcement, security, and defense cooperation, jointly combat the ‘three forces,’ and enhance cooperation in cybersecurity,” Xi said, referring to “terrorism, separatism, and extremism.”
Beijing views these forces as threats to national and regional security, and Xi has repeatedly emphasized this stance in his meetings with Central Asian leaders.
While China’s presence in Central Asia has historically focused on economic investments, its influence in the security sphere is growing through joint counter-terrorism drills, training programs, and aid.
This is particularly true in Tajikistan, which shares a long border with Afghanistan, where China is concerned about terrorists returning to carry out operations in its western Xinjiang region.
In his meeting with Tajik President Emomali Rahmon, Xi called for deeper cooperation in law enforcement and security to combat the three forces.
He also called for increasing bilateral trade and investment and improving transportation infrastructure.
Rahmon said Dushanbe would expand cooperation in new areas such as new energy, green industries, and artificial intelligence, and would “strengthen coordination with Beijing for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) to play a greater role.”
The SCO is the main forum for relations between China and the landlocked region. This political, economic, and security bloc was founded in 2001 by China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Turkmenistan, reflecting its commitment to “permanent neutrality,” is the only Central Asian country outside the organization.
On Tuesday, Xi also held talks with Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov, describing relations between the two countries as being in “the best period in history.”
Xi said the construction of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway is a top priority, but new growth drivers such as clean energy, green mining, and artificial intelligence should also be developed.
The talks followed the signing of cooperation documents between China and the summit’s host country, Kazakhstan, covering trade, investment, technology, tourism, and customs.
Xi asked his Kazakh counterpart, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, to accelerate cross-border railway projects and the improvement of port infrastructure.
Xi also stated, “Beijing and Astana should be strong supporters of each other in turbulent times.”
According to the Kazakh presidential office, Tokayev described relations between the two countries as stable and “not negatively affected by geopolitical challenges and turmoil or the international situation.”
-
Diplomacy7 days ago
Former diplomat warns forcing Iran out of the NPT is the greatest danger
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
European defense autonomy and Germany’s military role enter a turning point
-
Middle East1 week ago
Netanyahu’s government survives no-confidence vote as Haredi crisis is delayed
-
Diplomacy7 days ago
Former CIA analyst says Israel used ceasefire talks as a trap
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Japan, US showcase B-52 bombers in nuclear deterrence dialogue
-
Middle East1 week ago
Israel strikes Iran’s nuclear program, killing high-level commanders
-
Middle East4 days ago
Iran targets Mossad and Unit 8200 in missile attack on Tel Aviv
-
Russia2 weeks ago
Russia outlines naval development plan through 2050