Europe
Berlusconi’s legacy: Christian Europe united by a free market spirit

Italy was the most important country where an ‘anti-fascist consensus’ was established after the Second World War, albeit at an official level. The adoption of universal suffrage, the creation of the Constituent Assembly and the drafting of the Constitution were participated in by all the forces involved in the antifascist liberation struggle. The anti-fascist struggle in Italy had also turned into a war of liberation with the occupying Nazi Germany and the establishment of the collaborationist ‘Salo Republic’.
“Albeit at the official level” we said. Although the Italian Communist Party (PCI), the main organization of the partisans who were the vanguard of the anti-fascist resistance, was included in this consensus, the regime in Italy was controlled by a party of order, with the Christian Democrats (DC) at its center, at the behest of the US and NATO. This party of order did not hesitate to use its striking power against the communists through Gladio and the mafia. The PCI, even though it did not seek power, was another country within the country, another society within Italian society. Its prestige was high due to its sacrifices in the resistance. It was organized within the working class. In the 1976 elections, it received 34.4 percent of the vote and caused considerable fear in the establishment.
This, roughly speaking, reflected the balance of forces in the Italian First Republic. In the 1980s, two important transformations began to take place: First, the Italian establishment shifted to a strategy of high interest rates and currency devaluation, with the plan of full integration into the European common market. This was a strategy with which we were very familiar: Under the guise of ‘competitiveness’, lowering labor costs, cutting consumption of working people, reducing access to credit for small producers, intensive financialization and a partial transfer of sovereignty to Brussels. The second and perhaps more surprising development was the rapid adaptation of the PCI to these austerity policies. Italian communism may have begun to poison itself earlier, but it meant that a critical threshold had been crossed. It is very telling that the PCI’s vote in the last elections in 1987, in which it participated as a party, fell to its lowest level in 20 years.
It meant that the balance of forces on which the First Republic had been based was overturned. With the end of the Cold War, the corruption, nepotism, state-mafioso collaboration of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI), which was one of the wings of the party of order along with the DC, was being exposed. This period, known in our country as the ‘Clean Hands’ operation, marked the end of the First Republic in Italy and ushered in the ‘magistrate’ rule.
It was around this time, as the magistrate administration was running out of steam, an unknown boss announced that he would take the field to ‘fight communism’.
But was there communism left?
The PCI refashioned and renamed itself the Party of the Democratic Left (PDS). Considering the PDS reformist, the revolutionaries formed the Communist Refoundation Party. The latter group was also appreciated decently by former PCI voters. The 1993 local elections resulted in a decisive defeat for the DC and a partial victory for the PDS.
So Silvio Berlusconi began his fight against communism with the local election victory of the men of order in ties who were in fact whipping a dead horse. He declared the end of ‘party politics’ for Italy and said that the country would be governed by ‘completely new people’ in the new era. There was no more ‘popolo’ (people), there was ‘gente comune’ (ordinary people). The fate of Italy would no longer be decided by the people, but by the ‘free association of the electorate’. Against the ‘cartel of leftist forces’, he called for a ‘pole of freedom’ that would combine free enterprise and love of work with the family values of Catholic Italy.
Berlusconi was waging a war against the ‘traditional elites’ (i.e. those entrenched in the balance of power of the First Republic) and demanding an end to the Clean Hands operations.
Berlusconi challenged politics and politicians, arguing that only with a business spirit could the state become functional again.
It should not be surprising that the Lega, one of the critics of this ‘cumbersome state-business spirit’, today forms a coalition with Berlusconi’s party. It should also come as no surprise that a large proportion of DC voters in the First Republic voted for Forza Italia. After the electoral law was changed in 1993, there was a shift towards American-style two-party rule. Here Berlusconi took his place on the Italian political scene as the main element that carried the old DC mass base into the new era. In the Second Republic, where the mass base was marginalized and organizational politics was declared redundant, personalities came to the fore, and the figure of the leader who came into contact with the ‘electorate’ took the place of the man of the organization. The late Berlusconi was also working to establish this order. His media empire was the most important tool in creating a ‘charismatic’ figure. He would recreate the Italian right in his own image.
Contrary to what those who referred to him after his death as a ‘lover of national sovereignty’ might think, like all Italian parties in the 1990s and 2000s, he saw the EU as an external element that would ‘normalize’ Italy, as a tool that would free the state from sluggishness by forming fiscal discipline.
Together with his alliances with the Brothers of Italy and the Lega, he worked hard to establish an ‘anti-political’ right-wing discourse, now called the ‘post-fascist consensus’. His aphorism “Mussolini was not that bad dictator” describes this consensus well. The anti-fascist insurgents, the main engine of the First Republic, are now portrayed as just as brutal, cruel and violent as the fascists. Fascist shock troops and anti-fascist partisans deserve to be referred to together as ‘children of this land’. It is such a farce that the President of the Senate, Ignazio La Russa of the Brothers of Italy, who said that there was no anti-fascism in the Italian Constitution, was able to attend the ‘Liberation Day’ ceremonies a few days later. Even worse, the same Russa still has a bust of Mussolini in his house, an heirloom of his father.
It was unthinkable that this consensus, which had been reinforced by the PDS’s shift to the ‘center’, would not be shaken by the 2008 crisis. The first solution to this crisis was the domination of technocratic governments, adherence to Brussels and the mania for privatization. The technocratic governments imposed on Italy a wave of marketization that even Berlusconi at times hesitated to undertake. This period saw the disintegration of parties on the left and the right: The Democratic Party and Berlusconi were losing. Meanwhile, the mafioso leader was being investigated for corruption (a commonplace in Italian politics) and sidelined. By the 2018 general elections, the combined vote of the Democratic Party and Forza Italia did not even reach 33 percent. Henceforth, the 5 Star Movement (M5S) of comedian Beppe Grillo, an internet phenomenon, and the Lega, which took an ‘Italian nationalist’ position by trying to disassociate itself from the north, were at opposite ends of the political theatre. The M5S leader at the time, Luigi Di Maio, was not afraid to state the obvious: The Second Republic dominated by Berlusconi and the ‘center-left’ was dying.
That he is the symbol of the Second Republic should not mislead anyone. He always had friends in the First Republic too. Although he was never a member, he had very good relations with the PSI, the party of order of the first republic. With the collapse of the Second Republic, the fact that he managed to reinvent himself and throw himself into the right-wing coalition should be considered a success.
From now on, it seems inevitable that Forza Italia will be swallowed up by the other coalition partners. If the matter is charisma, Meloni and Salvini seem to have it all. Moreover, he seemed to have overcome his occasional polemics with Brussels: At the party congress, which he attended from his sickbed, he emphasized European unity against ‘Chinese imperialism’, differentiated his party from the likes of Marine Le Pen, and secured his place in the ‘center-right’ European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament. This is the ‘legacy’ of the Second Republic and Berlusconi’s death: Christian Europe and Italian values, united by a free market spirit.
Europe
American LNG faces challenges as Europe eyes Russian gas

American liquefied natural gas (LNG) has helped European Union (EU) countries replace a significant portion of Russian gas.
However, the trade war initiated by Donald Trump has also brought about distrust towards the US.
While the EU administration currently intends to use the US’s 90-day suspension of tariffs to agree on large-scale LNG purchases, some major European companies have begun to discuss the return of Russian gas to the market.
Didier Hollo, Vice President of the French company Engie, which is partly state-owned and was one of Gazprom’s largest customers before the war, told Reuters, “If an acceptable peace is achieved in Ukraine, it may be possible to return to supplying 60, perhaps 70 billion cubic meters per year, including LNG.”
In 2021, Russian gas supplies exceeded 150 billion cubic meters, accounting for approximately 40% of the EU’s gas imports. This was largely Gazprom’s product, and LNG purchases were not significant in the total volume at that time.
However, during the war, Gazprom lost more than two-thirds of its exports to the EU, and its share in the union’s imports fell below 10% this year, while Novatek’s LNG supply increased.
Patrick Pouyanné, CEO of French TotalEnergies, warned Europe against over-reliance on American gas, telling Reuters: “We need diversification; we need many routes instead of relying too much on one or two sources.”
Pouyanné added, “Europe will never return to importing 150 billion cubic meters from Russia as before the war… but I would bet on 70 billion cubic meters.”
TotalEnergies supplies a large amount of American LNG while also being a shareholder in Novatek and selling LNG from the Yamal LNG project, which is not under sanctions.
According to the European Commission and LSEG data, in 2024, Russian gas provided 18.8% of the EU’s imports; 11.4% came via pipelines, and 7.4% came in liquefied form.
This total share was higher than the share of LNG coming from the US (16.7%).
However, according to the Bruegel analysis center, the situation changed radically in the first quarter of 2025.
Total Russian supply decreased from 14.1 billion cubic meters in the previous quarter to 10.1 billion cubic meters.
This decrease resulted from the cessation of transit through Ukraine and LNG imports falling to their lowest level since the first quarter of 2021.
Meanwhile, purchases from the US reached an “unprecedented” level, hitting a record 18.4 billion cubic meters.
European companies have filed a total of 18 billion euros in claims against Gazprom because it stopped supplies in 2022.
The courts have already ruled that German Uniper should be paid 14 billion euros and Austrian OMV 230 million euros in compensation.
According to Hollo, as a first step towards resuming Gazprom’s contractual obligations, it could start supplying gas via pipeline through Ukraine with Kyiv’s approval to pay the compensations determined by the court: “Do you [Gazprom] want to return to the [European] market? Very well, but we will not sign a new contract until you pay the compensations [as per the court decision].”
The return of Russian gas is also advocated at the Leuna Chemical Park, one of Germany’s largest chemical production centers, where companies like Dow Chemical and Shell have facilities.
Previously, Russia covered 60% of the park residents’ needs, mostly via the Nord Stream pipeline, which was sabotaged in 2022.
Christoph Günther, General Manager of InfraLeuna, the park’s operator, stated, “We are in a severe crisis, and we cannot wait.”
Günther noted that the return of Russian gas is a “taboo” subject, but many of his colleagues agree that they need it.
Employment in Germany’s chemical industry has been declining for five consecutive quarters, an unprecedented situation in decades.
Meanwhile, according to three European officials speaking to Politico, the EU plans to start negotiations with the US to increase American LNG purchases to end the tariff war.
Brussels had tried this before, even before Trump announced he would impose comprehensive import tariffs, but according to diplomats, it faced bureaucratic obstacles and a lack of interest from Washington.
Now that Trump has postponed the implementation of increased tariffs (which would have been 20% for the EU) by three months, the European Commission will try to make an additional effort to reach an agreement on LNG.
In particular, a “collective demand” plan is being developed, under which the EU could place larger, pan-European orders at more favorable prices.
However, Politico notes that it is unclear how this will work. Ultimately, companies, not governments, make the deals, and some European companies state that they are already buying enough American gas.
Additionally, insufficient export capacity in the US currently limits the increase in supply.
New terminals are expected to become operational in 2026-2027, according to plans.
Europe
Germany to reduce annual refugee intake below 100,000

Friedrich Merz, leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Germany’s prime minister-designate, has announced that the number of new asylum seekers admitted into the country will be reduced to below 100,000 per year.
According to Zeit, Merz stated on ARD television’s political talk show, Caren Miosga, “Our idea is to significantly reduce this number now. The number of accepted refugees should no longer be in six-figure digits. Our cities, municipalities, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure are overburdened.”
Merz indicated that the new government, in accordance with the coalition agreement among the main parties, will deport “more people” and suspend family reunifications to decrease the number of asylum applications in Germany.
Referring to the goal of turning back asylum seekers at the country’s borders, Merz said, “This will happen.”
Merz noted that officials are already coordinating with neighboring countries, adding that the Austrian government, in particular, is “as interested as we are in solving this problem.”
According to the coalition agreement between the CDU, the Christian Social Union (CSU), and the Social Democratic Party (SPD), there are plans to turn back asylum seekers from Germany’s borders.
However, this practice must not violate the constitutional framework.
Merz’s five-point plan in January stated that the new government intends to introduce “permanent border controls.”
Last week, Merz said that Germany might reconsider its approach to granting citizenship and strengthen immigration control.
Specifically, the possibility of “accelerated citizenship” after three years of residence in Germany will be abolished.
In 2024, the number of first-time asylum applications in Germany exceeded 229,700.
This figure represents a decrease of approximately 100,000 compared to 2023.
Europe
EU revives offer for US gas after tariff pause

The European Union will revive an offer to buy more American gas, believing that US President Donald Trump is more open to negotiation after pausing the tariffs that have shaken the economy.
The EU plans to reopen talks to increase liquefied natural gas (LNG) purchases from the US and offer specific proposals to address Trump’s anger over transatlantic trade, according to three European officials familiar with the discussions who spoke to POLITICO.
Specifically, the officials said that the EU is looking for ways to aggregate demand to allow the continent to place larger, Europe-wide orders—but ideally at more competitive prices—to meet the White House’s demands.
The EU has been trying to make contact with the Trump administration on this issue for months, but diplomats claim they have encountered confusion and disinterest in Washington.
But allegedly, the situation has now changed: markets are collapsing, and business leaders are begging Trump to change tactics.
“These proposals have been on the table for some time, but we hope there is now an opportunity to make progress,” one of the officials said.
Since his election last November, Trump has repeatedly insisted that the EU buy more American oil and gas to avoid a trade war.
The President has also said that the EU needs to spend an additional $350 billion on American energy to offset what he sees as a “persistent trade deficit.”
Late Wednesday, Trump announced a 90-day pause on most global tariffs, insisting that America’s partners now negotiate to eliminate trade barriers.
The EU sees this as another opportunity to promote its LNG offer. Officials have openly expressed their desire to consume more American fuel, viewing it as a way to finally break all energy ties with Russia.
“In the future, we will buy more gas from the US,” said EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen at an industry event on Tuesday, stressing that these purchases must be in line with the bloc’s “green transformation” goals.
On the other hand, it is unclear how well a demand aggregation plan will work because, ultimately, companies, not governments, will make these purchases. The EU launched a similar system after the war in Ukraine, hoping to lower very high prices, but ultimately, very few companies participated.
Still, pooling orders from private suppliers and matching them with American suppliers is one way for the bloc to obtain larger volumes of US LNG.
Concerns about LNG prices are also casting a shadow over the talks.
The EU requires countries to fill their fuel storage tanks to 90% of capacity by November 1 each year, and capitals are concerned that the cost of rushing to buy supplies, most of which are American, during the summer will increase costs.
EU countries are trying to relax these rules, hoping that this flexibility will allow them to spend less on LNG.
On Thursday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned that the EU would respond in kind if tariffs were reimposed, but for now, “We want to give negotiations a chance.”
-
America6 days ago
The economic mind of Trumpism — 1: Stephen Miran and his dollar devaluation plan
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Israel bombs Syrian base T4, reportedly warning Türkiye against military presence
-
Europe2 weeks ago
Serbia and Hungary sign comprehensive military cooperation agreement
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Meta fined significantly in Türkiye for defying content removal orders
-
America6 days ago
US considers delisting Chinese stocks amid trade tensions
-
Diplomacy1 week ago
Trump’s tariffs boost interest in German, Japanese bonds
-
Europe2 weeks ago
European right gathers at Israeli government event on antisemitism
-
America2 weeks ago
BYD sales surge in Europe as Tesla faces ongoing struggles