Connect with us

ASIA

Afghanistan and Iran display political maturity to end border-dispute

Published

on

Afghanistan and Iran have been able to immediately put a full stop to the recent border skirmishes and both sides called it a mistake while Tehran says it was a “brief conflict”.

Three days ago, the security forces of Afghanistan and Iran embroiled in a new clash, marked by the exchange of gunfire and military tension that also left several people dead and injured.

The clashes that underlie an age-old issue of waters on Afghanistan’s Helmand River, claimed the lives of two Iranian border guards and one Taliban forces.

The Helmand River is Afghanistan’s largest river that provides Iran with 22 cubic meters of water per second under a 1973 agreement. However, the flow of water has dropped significantly and Taliban blame drought and climate change as the key reason. Taliban said they are committed to the water treaty with Iran but says they are also scrambling with water shortages.

The Commander of the Ground Forces of Iran and other officials visited the Sistan Region of South-Eastern Iran to investigate the field conditions of the Iran-Afghanistan border areas. (Iran Press)

However, Iran sees the situation from a different perspective and blames Afghanistan’s dam construction for exacerbating drought conditions in both sides of the neighboring countries.

Iran, in particular, is not happy with a Kajak dam built on the Helmand River that has altered the river’s course and prevented water from reaching Iran.

Political maturity

Whatever might be claimed and visible positions as some certain external circles already started jubilating on the border dispute between Afghanistan and Iran, the two neighboring countries exhibited immense adulthood to overcome the quarrel.

Taliban and Iranian officials immediately restrained from releasing infuriating statements, and both sides pledged to stop repeating the same mistake.

Iran’s Interior Minister, Ahmad Vahidi has described clashes on the border as a “brief conflict” and said the problem has been resolved after negotiations with the Taliban.

Vahidi tried well to downplay the severity of the clash, and stated that currently there is no problem and the border is open and in peace.

But he blamed the Afghan border guards for starting the battle, and said they were given an appropriate response.

The Taliban also said that they want to have good ties with Iran, adding the border clashes was a mistake. Taliban’s spokesman Bilal Karimi said that Islamic Emirate does not want tensions with anyone, including its neighbors, and called the border fighting a “small dispute”.

“We are in contact with Iranian officials and if there is any issue we will resolve it collectively,” Karimi added.

No proxies at all

It is important that Iran and Afghanistan should pay extreme attention to issues such as recent border conflict that should not lead to a proxy war between the neighboring countries.

“Taliban and Iranian officials have shown the courage to resolve the border dispute without harming their ties, and this is a great development on relations between the two countries,” said a political expert.

Speaking to Harici, Jamil Hadiri said that every dispute between Kabul and Tehran should be resolved through dialogues and diplomatic approach before the enemies use the opportunity against both of them.

“It was a big mistake to see direct clashes between security forces of the two countries, but at the same time, it was great to see the ability and willingness from the two sides in resolving the quarrel in just a day,” Hadiri said.

Many clashes erupted between Afghanistan and Iran

Since August 2021 when the Islamic Emirate swept into power, there have been many clashes with Iran, but the recent one was deadly.

Taliban and Iranian border guards fought five times in the past 21 months and the first clash was on December 1, 2021, in Shaghalak area in Nimroz province. Officials from both sides confirmed the clash and said it erupted due to “misunderstandings” between the border guards of the two countries. No casualties reported from the incident.

On April 21, 2022, clashes erupted again between Taliban and Iranian security forces near the Islam Qala border. The third time was on July 23, 2022, and the clashes took place near Hirmand border town.

In February 2023, another clash took place and the recent one was on Saturday, May 27, when the border guards of the sides engaged in deadly fighting in Pul-e-Abrisham border crossing in Nimroz province, west of Afghanistan.

Drought is another headache

Drought and climate change have been one of the biggest drivers of conflict between Afghanistan and Iran.

Iran has been scrambling with drought in the last 30 years and as a last resort, warned Afghan leaders to unlock the flow of water to Iran, or face some serious action.

Nimroz residents have been suffering from water shortage since last five years.

The Taliban treated the warning as a wake-up call and wanted swift responses to Iran authorities with military action in case of any attacks.

Taliban leadership time and again says drought is hitting harder areas bordering Iran, especially Nimroz province.

Some residents in Nimroz told Harici that dozens of families were forced to leave their homes and migrated to other places even to other provinces due to drought and non-availability of water.

We have been facing drought in the last five years, said Syiar Khan, a resident of Nimroz province. Speaking to Harici, he said that he lives in the Nad Ali area but other relatives of his, including his older brother, migrated to Kabul due to lack of water. “We are farmers, and water is our basic need. I have lost all of my income in the last five years and I am also considering leaving Zaranj city to another province,” Khan added.

“We purchase one tanker of potable water against 400Afs, and this is very costly at a time when the economy is very bad,” said another resident Amir Gul.

Gul called on the Taliban leadership to help remove water shortages in the province through any possible way and release water from Kajaki dam if necessary.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey