MIDDLE EAST
Prevalence of religious hypocrisy

After the return of the Taliban, hundreds of thousands of Afghan citizens went to European countries and the US, where they started a new life in the shadow of a different society and culture. In the meantime, one of the frequent scenes was the conflict of behavior of these citizens in Afghanistan and now in the West.
When a famous lady lived inside the country, she considered herself bound to wear the usual clothes in Afghanistan and was even careful not to publish her photo on social media outlets, but the same person as soon as she set foot in Europe, America or Australia, her way of dressing changed drastically and one of the first changes that appeared was to wear a mini dress and bare his head and neck.
Also, in the case of men, some of whom could not hear even a single word from their language in criticizing the current situation or the need to revise popular religious views, but these same people, after leaving the country and feeling immune from possible punishments, relentlessly attacked religious beliefs. They started and ridiculed the popular opinions in the country and also acted as revolutionary in criticizing the ruling policy and prominent politicians.
Another example, There were a large number of people who had jobs in the republic and had become wealthy, which they are thankful to the blessing of that system and were comfortable in their lives and did not show any kind of dissatisfaction with the existing situation. However, these people as soon as the republic system collapsed, they became first-class critics and suddenly opened their throats in praise of the “Emirate” system and even tried to build an image that they were already with the Taliban even during the Republic system.
What are the reasons for this behavior-conflict and what factors are involved?
Unfortunately, hypocrisy and pretense are one of the chronic and long-lasting diseases in our society, and the experts and academicians in the past have already spoken about this and proposed solutions. Despite this, the fact is that until the aggravating factors of this disease are removed from society, it should not be expected that hypocrisy will not become a second habit of citizens.
It seems that people use pretense and hypocrisy as a shield to protect themselves from possible calamities and disasters, and consider this method necessary to survive in unstable and chaotic conditions.
Although experts have tried to criticize pretense and hypocrisy for a long time, but the criticism of this phenomenon is not fruitful without doing something to provide a dignified life for humans. Until the root of this problem is not dealt with, there is no hope to improve the situation.
Religious governments are one of those governments that promote hypocrisy and hypocrisy
The Taliban government, is unfortunately, currently one of the worst examples of religious government in the world. This government gives itself the right to interfere in the smallest issues of the daily lives of the people and even impose rules for citizens on the type of clothing, beard and hair.
In the shadow of such governments that impose a certain way of life on people, the people are forced to turn to hypocrisy and pretense and choose a special way of dressing and a special way of life in order to be safe from any punishment of the government.
As soon as these people get out of the realm of totalitarian governments, they completely change their faces and reveal their inner selves. These days, if you walk the streets of the big cities of Afghanistan, such as Kabul, Balkh, and Herat, you will see the absolute majority of people with the same clothes and appearance, and fewer people are willing to take risks and, for example, shave their beards or grow their hair in a different way. This shows the intensity of citizens’ fear of the Taliban.
The society is blame for such messy rules
Although the Taliban regime is currently trying to establish an iron rule and impose a certain lifestyle on the citizens, if we do not ignore the truth, the Afghan society is also to blame for this situation. The citizens of Afghanistan often take the same layer and appearance from religion and do not have access to its depth and meaning.
It is that religious appearanceism is very common in the society, and of course, what has happened recently is that the political government is also in harmony and compatible with the majority of people in the appearanceism and giving priority to religious rites and rituals and disregarding the essence of religion.
If you want to gain the respect of the citizens and achieve a desirable social status and benefit from the facilities, you have to adhere to religious appearances and attend congregational prayers, let your beard grow long, carry a rosary in your hand, and chant religious slogans. Talk about piety, purity and fear of God. In such a situation, the majority of people act according to instinct and pretend to be religious and pious, but deep down they do not believe in these words at all.
Oppressive systems turn people into worthless and dishonorable creatures
In a society where bigotry is rampant, hypocrisy becomes common, and efforts are made to hide one’s opinion, because exposing one’s political or religious opinion threatens one’s life, property, and reputation. The higher the concentration of prejudice, the more hypocrisy spreads and becomes the rule of life. In such a society, reasoning and logic do not achieve the desired position and people see their interest in being with power and force.
In these societies, the protection of property and life is prioritized and opinion loses its importance. The members of such a society always hide themselves behind masks.
To build a good society, freedom should be considered before anything else. In a society where there is no freedom, people’s lives suffer from all kinds of plagues, including the disease of hypocrisy and pretense. Hypocrisy and pretense should not be considered only as a mental illness, but it should be considered as a phenomenon that spreads humiliation and slander and brings society to ruin and endangers social integration.
MIDDLE EAST
Türkiye, Israel reportedly negotiate Syrian de-confliction line

According to claims, Türkiye and Israel are negotiating a mechanism to prevent direct conflict in Syria amid rising tensions. It is alleged that the parties are considering establishing a communication line.
Türkiye and Israel, seeking to increase their influence in Syria after the end of the Bashar al-Assad administration, are reportedly in contact to establish a de-confliction line to prevent mutual misunderstandings or direct conflict. According to Western officials speaking to Middle East Eye, these talks gained momentum after Israel bombed the T4 airbase, where Türkiye wanted to deploy.
The report states that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu believes progress has been made on a de-confliction arrangement with Türkiye after the attacks, and that negotiations are ongoing. It was noted that Netanyahu is particularly insistent that no armed elements, including the Turkish military presence, be present in the southern regions of Syria.
Another source confirmed that direct contact was established between Ankara and Tel Aviv after the attacks on the T4 base, and that these contacts aimed to establish a de-confliction line. The source commented, “Immediately after the attacks, Turkish and Israeli officials said they did not want to clash with each other, using similar expressions. These statements seemed coordinated.”
It is suggested that Israel may remain silent or even accept the establishment of Turkish military bases in Hama and Palmyra, even if it uses harsh rhetoric in public. The same source argued that the US also favors reducing tensions in the region and therefore indirectly supports the process.
Sources speaking to Middle East Eye claimed that Netanyahu informed his counterparts that he had “limited time to attack the T4 base before Türkiye started to deploy militarily.” According to this, Netanyahu said that “after Türkiye enters, the base will be closed to Israeli operations.” The report stated, “The Turkish army being attacked by Israel, even by mistake, would carry the risk of triggering a major conflict. However, bringing air defense systems to the bases would also deter Israeli planes from operating in the region.”
Immediately after the air strikes, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused Ankara of trying to establish a “protectorate regime” in Syria. Israeli Defense Minister Yisrael Katz also said that he had “warned” Syrian President and HTŞ leader Abu Ahmed Shara about “enemy forces.”
Despite Israel’s harsh messages after the T4 attack, signals of softening were later given from both Türkiye and Israel. Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said in a statement to Reuters that Türkiye has no intention of direct military conflict with Israel. Similar statements came from senior Israeli officials as well.
Netanyahu, in a meeting with US President Donald Trump, stated that Israel does not want conflict with Türkiye on Syrian territory and that they discussed steps to eliminate this risk with Trump. Netanyahu pointed to Trump’s good relations with President Erdoğan, suggesting that Washington could play a mediating role.
Trump also said in the meeting, “If you have a problem with Türkiye, I believe I can solve it. I hope it won’t be necessary.” Trump, who referred to Erdoğan as “my great friend,” made remarkable statements for Erdoğan: “He achieved what no one has done for 2000 years, he took Syria.”
The normalization process between Türkiye and Israel, which began in mid-2023, was interrupted by the large-scale military operation launched by Israel in Gaza on October 7.
MIDDLE EAST
Trump’s tariffs may cost Israeli economy billions

The Israel Manufacturers Association has warned that the 17% tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on Israeli products could deal a $2.3 billion blow to the Israeli economy, potentially causing between 18,000 and 26,000 job losses.
This warning came hours before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s departure to Washington.
While Israel had hoped to avoid the tariffs announced by Trump, it removed all taxes on goods imported from the US last week. However, it still faces a 17% tariff from the US.
According to The Times of Israel, Israel Manufacturers Association President Dr. Ron Tomer, in a letter to Netanyahu, requested an urgent initiative with the Trump administration to remove these tariffs by using all possible means.
According to the analysis published by the association and presented to Netanyahu, if the tariff remains at 17%, Israel’s exports will suffer a $2.3 billion loss, and between 18,000 and 26,000 Israelis will be at risk of losing their jobs.
The association also warned that if Trump expands the tariffs to include the pharmaceutical and chip sectors, which have not yet been affected, the damage to Israel’s exports could reach $3 billion.
The areas expected to be most affected include biotechnology, plastics, metals, chemicals and fuels, and high technology, including robotics and electronic components.
The US is Israel’s largest trading partner. In 2024, the US imported over $13.5 billion worth of products from Israel.
Tomer stated in his letter that the tariffs could negatively impact Israel’s overall economic competitiveness, its capacity to attract investment, and its technological superiority. In a worse-case scenario, taxes on electronic products could also directly and negatively affect the export of software and IT services, he warned.
“In light of the expected serious consequences, the government needs to prevent the implementation of these tariffs by using all the diplomatic and economic tools at its disposal,” said Tomer, arguing that the damage to the Israeli economy could be prevented with decisive and rapid steps.
MIDDLE EAST
Hashd al-Shaabi militia groups in Iraq weigh disarmament amid US pressure

According to ten senior commanders and officials who spoke to Reuters, some Iran-aligned militia groups in Iraq, known as Hashd al-Shaabi (Popular Mobilization Forces), are prepared to lay down their arms for the first time to avoid a potential conflict with the US administration under President Donald Trump. Sources, including six local commanders from four major militia organizations, indicate that this move to de-escalate tensions follows private warnings issued by US officials to the Iraqi government since Trump took office in January. The US conveyed to Baghdad that these groups could face airstrikes if they are not disbanded.
Izzat al-Shahbandar, a Shiite politician close to the Iraqi government, told Reuters that discussions between Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and militia leaders are “very advanced,” and the groups are responding positively to the US call for disarmament. “These groups are not being stubborn. They are aware that they could be targets of US attacks,” said Shahbandar.
The report stated that the six commanders who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity are from the following groups: Kata’ib Hezbollah (Hezbollah Brigades), Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba (Movement of the Noble Ones), Kata’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada (Sayyid al-Shuhada Brigades), and Ansar Allah al-Awfiya (Supporters of God’s Loyalists). A commander from Kata’ib Hezbollah, one of the most influential organizations, allegedly said, “Trump is ready to take this war to a worse point. We want to prevent this disaster.”
According to the report, militia commanders stated that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has authorized them to take all necessary steps to avoid a devastating conflict with the US and Israel.
These organizations, part of the Iraqi Islamic Resistance, possess approximately 50,000 fighters and long-range missiles. Citing two security officials, Reuters reports that the Iraqi Islamic Resistance is “a key pillar of Iran’s regional proxy network.”
These organizations have claimed responsibility for dozens of missile and drone attacks targeting US interests in Israel and Syria since October 7.
Farhad Alaeddin, Prime Minister Sudani’s foreign policy advisor, told Reuters that the government aims to bring all weapons under state control and intends to achieve this “through constructive dialogue with various national actors.”
Two security officials close to the Sudani government reported that the prime minister is insistent on disarming all militias affiliated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps or the Quds Force.
According to officials and commanders, since mid-January, some groups have largely evacuated their headquarters and reduced their presence in major cities such as Mosul and Anbar, fearing airstrikes. It was also noted that many commanders have increased security measures during this time, changing their cell phones, vehicles, and residences more frequently.
A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, stated that there have been instances in the past where militias have ceased attacks due to US pressure, but doubts remain about whether any disarmament will be long-term.
Shahbandar noted that a final agreement with the militia organizations has not yet been reached, and the disarmament mechanism is still under discussion. Options such as transforming the militias into political parties or integrating them into the Iraqi army are being considered.
Reuters included the following assessments in the report:
While the fate of any disarmament process remains uncertain, the discussions still indicate that the militias are preparing for the first time to yield to long-standing Western pressure.
This shift coincides with a fragile period for the “Axis of Resistance” that Tehran has built over decades. Iran’s regional proxy forces have been significantly impacted by the war that began after Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Hamas and Hezbollah in Lebanon have been subjected to heavy Israeli attacks, and the Houthis in Yemen have been targeted by US air operations. The decline of Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad has also weakened Tehran’s influence.
Iraq is trying to balance its policies regarding militias with both Washington and Tehran. These groups were formed with Iran’s financial and military support after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003 and have grown into a force capable of rivaling the national army over time.
According to two government officials and two security sources, US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, shortly after the start of American attacks on the Houthis, requested in a phone call with Prime Minister Sudani on March 16 that he prevent the militias from launching retaliatory attacks on Israel and US bases in the region in support of their allies.
Since the start of the Gaza war, Iraq-based militias have carried out dozens of drone and rocket attacks against Israel in solidarity with Hamas and killed three US soldiers in a drone operation near the Syrian border in Jordan last year.
Sudani’s former advisor, Ibrahim al-Sumaidaie, stated on state television, “The US has long wanted these militias to be disbanded, but this time Washington may not accept ‘no’ for an answer. If we do not comply voluntarily, it may be imposed on us from the outside and by force.”
-
EUROPE2 weeks ago
F-35 debate intensifies across Germany and Europe
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
Beijing’s energy rules threaten Nvidia H20 chip sales in China
-
DIPLOMACY2 weeks ago
Trump’s proposed fees on Chinese ships threaten US maritime industry
-
EUROPE2 weeks ago
Calls for German nuclear armament grow louder
-
EUROPE2 weeks ago
Huawei lobbying investigation leads to searches at EP offices in Strasbourg
-
EUROPE2 weeks ago
Leaked draft reveals German coalition disagreements on key policies
-
OPINION2 weeks ago
The Houthi War: The “Sixth Middle East War” and the Palestinian Narrative
-
EUROPE2 weeks ago
AfD aims to expand influence in European Parliament